Clapper shuts down Piss Gate

Thing1 said:
Why do you have no problem whatsoever with Trump's repeated use of fake news & innuendo throughout the campaign?
Click to expand...

What "fake news" did Trump use in the campaign. And I want you to be specific to things Trump actually said.

Ready? Go!
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
I did, and I determined Clapper was dismayed that an unverifiable dossier, produced by a *private security firm*, was released by the press.

This isn't a Wiki release of verifiable and undeniable documents. To be perfectly blunt, it's a load of bullshit that's been proven false---at every point it can be proven either way. Trump's lawyer was PROVEN to never have been in Prague, for example.

It's crap, but keep running with it if you want. It's not hurting Trump but further damaging CNN [Crap News Network] and the establishment media more generally.

CNN just lowered themselves to the level of the National Enquirer, just to try and damage Trump.
Click to expand...

where has it been proven false? it has been denied and our intelligence community has disavowed it but no credible source has either verified or denied it.

what still concerns me is trump's kid gloves treatment of russia when he feels free to criticize (via tweet) anyone else. this should not be considered proof, but it casts suspicion on trump which is difficult prove or disprove and therefore damaging. i say get the agent who authored this and pay him, if need be, to put up or shut up, just do not let it just hang there.
 
Don Quixote said:
where has it been proven false? it has been denied and our intelligence community has disavowed it but no credible source has either verified or denied it.

what still concerns me is trump's kid gloves treatment of russia when he feels free to criticize (via tweet) anyone else. this should not be considered proof, but it casts suspicion on trump which is difficult prove or disprove and therefore damaging. i say get the agent who authored this and pay him, if need be, to put up or shut up, just do not let it just hang there.
Click to expand...

The dossier has been floating around for months. All the major outlets had it and Hillary's campaign no doubt was aware of it, but everybody sat on it during the campaign.

Why didn't they use it then?
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
The dossier has been floating around for months. All the major outlets had it and Hillary's campaign no doubt was aware of it, but everybody sat on it during the campaign.

Why didn't they use it then?
Click to expand...

i suggest that they could not verify it and therefore decided not to use it. like i said, go to the source and either get proof or a denial.
 
Don Quixote said:
i suggest that they could not verify it and therefore decided not to use it. like i said, go to the source and either get proof or a denial.
Click to expand...

I think you get paid to suck cock. Now it is up to you to disprove it and sorry your denials won't cut it.

You get paid to suck cock. Oh and your wife does too
 
Don Quixote said:
i suggest that they could not verify it and therefore decided not to use it. like i said, go to the source and either get proof or a denial.
Click to expand...

They didn't use it for the exact reasons any self-respecting major news outlet shouldn't release it. Rest assured, there's unverifiable documents attesting to Obama's or Hillary's sex life. Since they can't be verified [read: it's almost certainly fiction] it doesn't get released.

There's been rumors floating around forever about Hillary being a lesbian, for example. And I'm sure there's a private security firm out there that would be happy to sell a dossier supporting it. And if it got released by Fox News you guys would be jumping straight-legged.

And rightfully so. It's low-ball, gutter politics.
 
Don Quixote said:
the statement from the intelligence community disavows themselves from the origin of the broadcast statement but does not deny the truth of it. read the entire statement from a symbolic logic standpoint and determine what was actually said.
Click to expand...

EXACTLY
 
Teflon Don said:
I think you get paid to suck cock. Now it is up to you to disprove it and sorry your denials won't cut it.

You get paid to suck cock. Oh and your wife does too
Click to expand...

Obviously, you do it for free for Trump. You get the additional perk that he pissed all over you during the campaign and told you it was raining. And you believed him.
 
Celticguy said:
While you believe a you toob video got the Libyan ambassador murdered.
Click to expand...

It played a part in inflaming the situation, if nothing else.

Keep in mind, that a political cartoon of Mohammed with a lit bomb for a turban and other similar depictions caused the deaths of several people associated with them, including the Charlie Hebdo staff and two people attending a Mohammed cartoon event in Dallas.

So don't sit there like a typical lying right-wing idiot, trying to insinuate that the idea of radical Muslim violence being sparked over something in the media is somehow highly implausible.

You fucks are always more than happy to accuse Muslims of being ready to commit violence at the slightest provocation except for when it's not convenient to some other bullshit narrative you're trying to push.

Now shut up and sit down.
 
Fuck Piers Morgan and his pissed in panties.

Slump is going to get what's coming to him.

Paybacks are going to be a BITCH.

An even bigger bitch than the money grubbing porn slut he's currently married to.
 
domer76 said:
You had better reread his statement. He didn't say shit.
Click to expand...

No, he didn't say shit because there's not much to say about. There's this little thing known as corroborating evidence that keeps him and *honest* journalists from commenting on it.

Do you fall for any other logical fallacies besides the 'are you still beating your wife?' sort lol?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top