Latest Clinton emails

J

J Craft

Well-known member
FBI released more Clinton emails yesterday. They purport to show that very sensitive email was sent to outside non government email (rumor is that it was Sid Blumenthol) whose email server was hacked by Russians, Chinese, and Israel. Information in some of these email had names and missions of agents working for our government

This is criminal. Will Obama pardon her?
 
J Craft said:
FBI released more Clinton emails yesterday. They purport to show that very sensitive email was sent to outside non government email (rumor is that it was Sid Blumenthol) whose email server was hacked by Russians, Chinese, and Israel. Information in some of these email had names and missions of agents working for our government

This is criminal. Will Obama pardon her?
Click to expand...
Blumenthal yet again..he was her principle"advisor" on Libya,and he got that all wrong too.
She wasn't even supposed to deal with him when she was Sec - Obama could not (rightly) stand him..

Anyways...more gross negligence/extreme carelessness.
"The Russians did it" was of damnside more important there then the DNC/Podesta stuff if she had gotten elected.

America dodged a bullet. Forget her.
 
J Craft said:
FBI released more Clinton emails yesterday. They purport to show that very sensitive email was sent to outside non government email (rumor is that it was Sid Blumenthol) whose email server was hacked by Russians, Chinese, and Israel. Information in some of these email had names and missions of agents working for our government

This is criminal. Will Obama pardon her?
Click to expand...

The Russians, the Chinese, and Israel...and Assange says their source was not a state actor. Those emails were being broadcast live all over the world. Nothing like inept corruption to cost you an election.

To answer your question, Yes.
 
anatta said:
Blumenthal yet again..he was her principle"advisor" on Libya,and he got that all wrong too.
She wasn't even supposed to deal with him when she was Sec - Obama could not (rightly) stand him..

Anyways...more gross negligence/extreme carelessness.
"The Russians did it" was of damnside more important there then the DNC/Podesta stuff if she had gotten elected.

America dodged a bullet. Forget her.
Click to expand...

Its extremely obvious that Obama dropped the ball over cyber security. That he and liberals were not up in arms when they discovered actual government agencies and officials being hacked, but are now campaigning in meltdown mode over the DNC, a non government agency, and Podesta, a non government official, shows he wasn't as concerned with American security so much as the damage that leaked Podesta emails did by showing how corrupt the DNC and our media are.

Jeff Sessions, is rumored to be prepared to drive this point home, during what will surely be a democrat dog and pony show over his confirmation. over his
 
J Craft said:
Its extremely obvious that Obama dropped the ball over cyber security. That he and liberals were not up in arms when they discovered actual government agencies and officials being hacked, but are now campaigning in meltdown mode over the DNC, a non government agency, and Podesta, a non government official, shows he wasn't as concerned with American security so much as the damage that leaked Podesta emails did by showing how corrupt the DNC and our media are.

Jeff Sessions, is rumored to be prepared to drive this point home, during what will surely be a democrat dog and pony show over his confirmation. over his
Click to expand...
the unclassifed report is pretty thin..lots of assertions with little to back it up.
Yes it's unclassified -but why release something that is just a bunch of assertions?
I always wonder what INTEL agencies come up with;afterall they are serving a POTUS's perogatives.

anyways.."The Russians did it" is lame enough on it's own 2 feet. You make good points none of this was addressed when it actually happened.
Then Obama does his sanctions afterwards? He says something about not politicizing the election, but back in October there WAS an announcement about Russian hacking..
https://www.washingtonpost.com/post...erything:homepage/card&utm_term=.817643fc0ea6
Recall that the intelligence community issued a warning in early October about Russian interference in the election, including, “the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of emails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations.” What puzzles me is why that announcement didn’t have more of an effect.
Click to expand...
 
J Craft said:
FBI released more Clinton emails yesterday. They purport to show that very sensitive email was sent to outside non government email (rumor is that it was Sid Blumenthol) whose email server was hacked by Russians, Chinese, and Israel. Information in some of these email had names and missions of agents working for our government

This is criminal. Will Obama pardon her?
Click to expand...

Usually to earn a pardon one has to be found guilty of a crime, innuendo in rightlandsville isn't proof of a crime, but keep believing it if it makes your day
 
anatta said:
Blumenthal yet again..he was her principle"advisor" on Libya,and he got that all wrong too.
She wasn't even supposed to deal with him when she was Sec - Obama could not (rightly) stand him..

Anyways...more gross negligence/extreme carelessness.
"The Russians did it" was of damnside more important there then the DNC/Podesta stuff if she had gotten elected.

America dodged a bullet. Forget her.
Click to expand...

A real bullet, and now they got Alfred E Newman running the show
 
GazzaQueen said:
The Russians, the Chinese, and Israel...and Assange says their source was not a state actor. Those emails were being broadcast live all over the world. Nothing like inept corruption to cost you an election.

To answer your question, Yes.
Click to expand...

Amazing watching the right now raise Assange to a creditable source, just a few years ago they wanted him hanged up by his toes
 
J Craft said:
You'd be wrong. A pardon can be granted without criminal conviction. This isn't "rightist" it's an actual set of circumstances that posed actual national security breaches.

http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2016/11/explaining-president-obamas-outgoing-pardon-powers/
Click to expand...

Yeah, that happens a lot, regardless, you still have to be at least charged with a crime, and outside of the right wing media, I ain't seen that happen yet, even though the right has tried it nine times
 
archives said:
Yeah, that happens a lot, regardless, you still have to be at least charged with a crime, and outside of the right wing media, I ain't seen that happen yet, even though the right has tried it nine times
Click to expand...
You'd be wrong again, she can be pardoned for crimes she "may" have committed while serving. She could not be pardoned for any future crimes she may commit.

You should have your facts in order if you are going to play the role of lecturer.
 
archives said:
Yeah, that happens a lot, regardless, you still have to be at least charged with a crime, and outside of the right wing media, I ain't seen that happen yet, even though the right has tried it nine times
Click to expand...

You obviously didn't read the article and thus you show your ignorance. You were wrong, be brave and admit it.
 
Bigdog said:
As far as I know, his credibility was never in doubt.
Click to expand...

That's the way I felt about it as well. Whenever Wiki exposed stuff on the U.S. or any other country, I was upset with the actual event and those involved...not Assange.

In a way now one could draw a conclusion that Hillary was the original "hacker" here. Then, her hacked stuff got hijacked by another hacker. SHE was the one who put U.S. government correspondence on a PRIVATE server. No person or country hacked a government server here. She alone is responsible for all her emails getting leaked through Wiki...not the Russians. All those emails with Podesta and Obama and whoever else were on a PRIVATE server. This does not constitute an act of war worthy of reprisal by us. Just my opinion, but then maybe I've read too many Tom Clancy books, LOL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top