Sen. Shaheen: Trump “doesn't seem to understand the enormity” of the Russia hack

Bill

Malarkeyville
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen: Trump “doesn't seem to understand the enormity” of the Russia hack

Jeanne Shaheen

Congress can take further action, and, in fact, Sen. [Lindsey] Graham, in the hearing today, talked about his desire to have a bigger rock to throw at Russia. I do think there are a number of us who feel that way, who believe that it's very important for us to take action against Russia. Not only in the United States but in other countries where Russia is doing the same kinds of things.

We're getting reports from Germany already that they're looking at trying to influence the elections there. They're supporting Marine Le Pen in France, through contributions. We know that they've disrupted Ukraine and efforts to have elections in Ukraine. They've disrupted elections in other countries in Eastern Europe.

We don't need to just act as Americans, because it's in our own national security, but we need to act with our allies to address this. I think it's very clear that this is another strategy, it's another tool that Russia is using to try and undermine Western democracy.
Jennifer Williams

How do you think Congress should respond to the broader allegations about Trump and some of his advisers having financial and personal ties to Russia?
Jeanne Shaheen

I think that if there are questions about potential conflicts of interest with nominees of the president-elect, and in terms of potential conflicts of interest that he might have, it's important for us to try and address those — if there's not a willingness [on the part of the individuals themselves] to act independently, for Congress to try and investigate the extent of those conflicts.

One of the conversations I had this morning was with Rex Tillerson, the nominee to be secretary of state. One of the first things he said to me was he pointed out that he had divested of his interests in Exxon, that he had resigned, effective in the end of December, and that he was making sure that he had complied with what he understood to be the requirements for avoiding those kinds of conflicts.

I would hope that the president-elect might follow the example of some of his nominees and do the same thing.
Jennifer Williams

Do you think, more generally, that the Democrats either are intending to try to block or would have a realistic chance of blocking any of Trump's nominees so far, given that the Democrats don't have the kind of power they did in the previous Congress?
Jeanne Shaheen

You know, I think it depends on what comes out in the hearings and what we learn about the nominees and their backgrounds and their approach to the positions.

While it no longer takes 60 votes for appointments for anyone other than Supreme Court nominees, in the Senate, the fact is I believe my colleagues on the other side of the aisle don't want to put someone in place who's going to have blatant conflicts of interest, who's not going to comply with the laws that are required for a position.

For example, in the Small Business Committee, historically we have asked for five years of tax returns. Well, that's what we're going to get from the nominee.

I do think there are requirements that people are being asked to comply with. There have been allegations about nominee [Tom] Price to the Department of Health and Human Services about what his financial transactions have been, and some questions raised about that. I think we need to get answers to those questions.

I think that's part of what the hearing process is all about, to give us an opportunity to find out more about the candidates who've been nominated, their backgrounds, and about their views on the issues that are going to come before the department that they're supposed to be heading.

You know, I have serious reservations about a head of the EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] who has tried to undermine regulations that protect air and water in this country. I have serious reservations about somebody to head the Department of Energy who, when he ran for president, said he wanted to abolish the Department of Energy.

I think we need to see how these nominees are going to answer questions and what the hearing process tells us and tells the American people, then make decisions based on that.
Jennifer Williams

With respect to Trump's actions even before taking office, such as taking and making phone calls with foreign leaders without consulting the State Department, and using Twitter to make policy statements on issues from our policy toward China and Taiwan to our country's nuclear arsenal, is that something that you and your colleagues are concerned about?

Jeanne Shaheen

Well, I'm very concerned about it. And we heard from members of the Armed Services Committee this morning, on both sides of the aisle, about some of the concerns that they share about his statements relative to the intelligence community and how that undermines American credibility with other countries. How that helps our enemies, or those countries who would oppose the United States — North Korea, Iran, and China.
"“I think there are serious concerns that are shared on both sides of the aisle about what Trump's foreign policy might look like, and consistency”"

I think there are serious concerns that are shared on both sides of the aisle about what Trump's foreign policy might look like, and consistency. I've certainly heard from European leaders, who I've had a chance to meet with, both before and after the election, who have expressed concerns about what the positions of the United States are going to be under the new president. Whether they can count on our support, whether we're going to support our traditional allies.

I think some of his statements have further created confusion at times when what we need is clarity.
 
This is the danger of electing a narcissist.

Trump sees the entire thing ONLY in terms of how it affects him personally. That's it.
 
Dimbulb Slump understands the enormity of it just fine. He understood it back when Putin's KGB hacking squad first explained to him how they were going to do it and he agreed to go along with it.

There's just no way he's ever going to acknowledge it because in typical fashion, he's more concerned with his own public image than he is about the laws and national security of America.

If we're lucky, he'll have a total mental/nervous breakdown and be committed to the looney bin for the next four years.
 
Boy, you like this one.

Did you spend the whole morning googling until you found one disgruntled Trump supporter talking to the Russian news?
Didn't need to, why should we listen to an actual CIA analyst when we could listen to a fuckton of partisan hacks with an axe to grind instead?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Dimbulb Slump understands the enormity of it just fine. He understood it back when Putin's KGB hacking squad first explained to him how they were going to do it and he agreed to go along with it.

There's just no way he's ever going to acknowledge it because in typical fashion, he's more concerned with his own public image than he is about the laws and national security of America.

If we're lucky, he'll have a total mental/nervous breakdown and be committed to the looney bin for the next four years.
I don't know if you are a sock or not, but somebody has definitely got their hand up your arse.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
So, yesterday it was 'a complex cyber attack' and today's talking point is Trump 'doesn't understand the enormity of a it' lol.

You get the idea they're trying to milk this one for all it's worth before the 20th gets here.
 
So, yesterday it was 'a complex cyber attack' and today's talking point is Trump 'doesn't understand the enormity of a it' lol.

You get the idea they're trying to milk this one for all it's worth before the 20th gets here.

I actually get the impression they're trying to define Trump's foreign policy for him for the next 4 years, at least. I don't think this is going away anytime soon. They're playing the bi-partisan Congress (establishment) vs. Trump IMHO.
 
I actually get the impression they're trying to define Trump's foreign policy for him for the next 4 years, at least. I don't think this is going away anytime soon. They're playing the bi-partisan Congress (establishment) vs. Trump IMHO.

I get that; further, it's not surprising since Trump is definitely a threat to the establishment status quo.

But boxing Trump in on foreign policy may or may not work. For example, what if Putin doesn't want to be locked into a diplomatic framework defined by Obama? ---who he doesn't like.

If Trump is as persuasive on the global stage as he has been in domestic politics, the establishment is going to be in for a rough ride. Maybe that's why they're acting so desperate. Hard to say.
 
Dimbulb Slump understands the enormity of it just fine. He understood it back when Putin's KGB hacking squad first explained to him how they were going to do it and he agreed to go along with it.

There's just no way he's ever going to acknowledge it because in typical fashion, he's more concerned with his own public image than he is about the laws and national security of America.

If we're lucky, he'll have a total mental/nervous breakdown and be committed to the looney bin for the next four years.

Seriously+_ef8198a162c1b18d08a3d37ac9dbc8ce.jpg
 
Sen. Shaheen“doesn't seem to understand the enormity” of the "don't give a flying fuck" attitude of most people on the right.
 
Trump doesn't understand the enormity of anything. A clueless, pathologically lying incompetent.

But, he knows more than the generals about ISIS and has a secret plan that only he knows to take care of them. lol
 
Trump doesn't understand the enormity of anything. A clueless, pathologically lying incompetent.

But, he knows more than the generals about ISIS and has a secret plan that only he knows to take care of them. lol

He understands how to look people dead in the eye and lie without blinking.

He certainly understands that, if nothing else.
 
Democrats are blowing this way out of proportion.

They didn't hack any government databases, didn't steal national security secrets, and the hack did not present an imminent threat to our national security.

They hacked a political party's emails. Had there been no embarrassing CORRUPTION by the Democrats, no one would care.

Was it wrong, yes. It is only a big deal to dems because they got caught with their pants down. And, have you ever seen dems take ownership of the corruption? All I've heard is - - look - - the Russians are coming.
 
This is the danger of electing a narcissist.

Trump sees the entire thing ONLY in terms of how it affects him personally. That's it.
As if Billy and Obama weren't narcissists.

You've gone full hacktard since the election. Take a breather, stretch your legs and get back to us.
 
Back
Top