Calif ban~non-essential taxpayer funded travel to 4 states over their anti-LGBT laws

Bill

Malarkeyville

By Jeff Taylor · Saturday, January 7, 2017
Assemblyman Evan Low
Assemblyman Evan Low
California‘s ban on non-essential taxpayer funded travel to four states over their anti-LGBTQ laws has officially gone into effect with the start of the new year.

The bill, AB1887, bans travel to Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Kansas,
and was authored by gay Assemblyman Evan Low. Gov. Jerry Brown signed it into law in September of last year. It was inspired by North Carolina’s House Bill 2, which invalidated non-discrimination ordinances passed by cities throughout the state and requires transgender individuals to use the bathrooms and locker rooms matching the gender on their birth certificates. A recent repeal effort failed.

Meanwhile, Mississippi landed on the Golden State’s list with a law allowing businesses to discriminate based on their religious beliefs, Tennessee with one allowing mental health specialists and therapists to also discriminate based on religious beliefs, and Kansas by allowing campus-based religious groups to discriminate against LGBTQ students.

Bills limiting bathroom use by transgender individuals were also recently filed in Texas, Virginia and Kentucky. Should they pass, one imagines they too will find themselves on the receiving end of California’s travel ban.

“Our state has clearly said our taxpayer dollars will not fund bigotry or hatred,” Low told The Bay Area Reporter. “If other states try to pass similar laws, we will do everything we can in our power to stop any type of discrimination from happening to Californians. As you know, our zero tolerance policy says there is no room for discrimination of any kind in California and this bill ensures discrimination will not be tolerated of any kind outside our borders.”
 
How many taxpayer-funded "non-essential" travels are normally made to those four states? I wish so-called "journalists" would actually research their topics more before publishing. How is the reader supposed to know how much this new ban actually affects anything if they don't give us an idea of before and after? :palm:
 
"non-essential taxpayer funded travel"????

Yeah, they should ban "joy rides" taken on the taxpayer's dime to EVERY State.
 
Other states have already done this. There are myriad conventions, or other meetings for state officials that occur on a regular basis in these states. Sure, it's mostly symbolic, but the real issue is the millions in corporate losses for these states.

NC will soon repeal their idiotic pro discrimination law. Who knows if the new Indiana governor will see the light once Pence is gone?
 
Other states have already done this. There are myriad conventions, or other meetings for state officials that occur on a regular basis in these states. Sure, it's mostly symbolic, but the real issue is the millions in corporate losses for these states.

NC will soon repeal their idiotic pro discrimination law. Who knows if the new Indiana governor will see the light once Pence is gone?

What exactly is discriminatory about NCs law? Be specific. I don't care if it makes you feel bad?
 
I take CA declarations of discrimination with a grain of salt. OP doesn't list the "offenses"
 

By Jeff Taylor · Saturday, January 7, 2017
Assemblyman Evan Low
Assemblyman Evan Low
California‘s ban on non-essential taxpayer funded travel to four states over their anti-LGBTQ laws has officially gone into effect with the start of the new year.

The bill, AB1887, bans travel to Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Kansas,
and was authored by gay Assemblyman Evan Low. Gov. Jerry Brown signed it into law in September of last year. It was inspired by North Carolina’s House Bill 2, which invalidated non-discrimination ordinances passed by cities throughout the state and requires transgender individuals to use the bathrooms and locker rooms matching the gender on their birth certificates. A recent repeal effort failed.

Meanwhile, Mississippi landed on the Golden State’s list with a law allowing businesses to discriminate based on their religious beliefs, Tennessee with one allowing mental health specialists and therapists to also discriminate based on religious beliefs, and Kansas by allowing campus-based religious groups to discriminate against LGBTQ students.

Bills limiting bathroom use by transgender individuals were also recently filed in Texas, Virginia and Kentucky. Should they pass, one imagines they too will find themselves on the receiving end of California’s travel ban.

“Our state has clearly said our taxpayer dollars will not fund bigotry or hatred,” Low told The Bay Area Reporter. “If other states try to pass similar laws, we will do everything we can in our power to stop any type of discrimination from happening to Californians. As you know, our zero tolerance policy says there is no room for discrimination of any kind in California and this bill ensures discrimination will not be tolerated of any kind outside our borders.”

when will California come to its senses and ban taxpayer funded travel everywhere.......you'd think they didn't owe billions of dollars they will never be able to pay as it is......
 
Other states have already done this. There are myriad conventions, or other meetings for state officials that occur on a regular basis in these states. Sure, it's mostly symbolic, but the real issue is the millions in corporate losses for these states.

will it matter to the other states if representatives of California can't come?.......they're probably just full of brainwashed liberal ideas anyway.......it will be better for the whole country if they stay away......
 
Other states have already done this. There are myriad conventions, or other meetings for state officials that occur on a regular basis in these states. Sure, it's mostly symbolic, but the real issue is the millions in corporate losses for these states.

NC will soon repeal their idiotic pro discrimination law. Who knows if the new Indiana governor will see the light once Pence is gone?

I get it now......its another gaycott......
 
For the cost that this is causing ( legal fees, aggravation, political grandstanding etc) how about all public buildings just put in a third toilet with a question mark on the door. Problem solved within reason.
 
Here is a good logo!

8d1a2a0bc9ea5711dfd8fff97eef81c4.jpg



Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top