So you think the gubmint should 'decide' who owns guns based on a subjective opinion about mental problems? Insane
Yeah. The guy with the mental problem should decide.
Idiot.
So you think the gubmint should 'decide' who owns guns based on a subjective opinion about mental problems? Insane
I just don't want the fed govt determining something as subjective as 'mental illness'. Nothing is worthy of trashing the 2nd.
Whatever you say. I live here.
Sorry, that is just paranoid clap trap.
Your precious 2nd has limitations, just like every other right. Even your dead douchebag, Scalia, recognized that.
So do I. And it IS paranoid clap trap.
and as he was about most things constitutional, he was all wrong.
Yeah. The guy with the mental problem should decide.
Idiot.
Your precious 2nd has limitations, just like every other right. Even your dead douchebag, Scalia, recognized that.
All rights have their limitations. Your precious Second is no different.
It doesn't really matter whether he was wrong in Heller. He wrote the majority opinion and it stands.
So we can place the same limits on abortion?
Like waiting three days to get one?
or deciding that there isn't a right to have one anymore?
so you're cool with any supreme court rewriting the constitution?
The federal govt shouldn't.
So we can place the same limits on abortion?
Like waiting three days to get one?
I know, I know. Every ruling the courts make that you RW morons don't like, it's the same old bullshit. "Unelected, activist judges." You poor ignorant lemmings. So predictable. Rewriting the Constitution? Pfffft!
You just aren't very bright, are you? But you are a GREAT lemming!
you didn't answer the question. avoiding something?
Sorry, dimwit. They say there's no such thing as a stupid question. Well, pally boy, you just proved that adage wrong. I don't answer stupid questions.
Run along now, lemming.
I hope Trump will do something about this.