Outside of the fact that it is a tragedy, don"t see why the media

Rune said:
Your anecdotes are not facts and conflict with established medicine.
The progressive nature of opioid addiction is not open to debate.
Click to expand...
you are not even defining your medical terminology. "Progressive nature" is what? more and more tolerance?
Upto a point.
Any use of any drug ( mostly) shows a tolerance build up - but there is also a point where addicts
get enough, and do not have to increase -or else every addict would eventually over-dose ..

You are not thinking this out as usual -you are just regurgitating DEA talking points.
 
anatta said:
you are not even defining your medical terminology. "Progressive nature" is what? more and more tolerance?
Upto a point.
Any use of any drug ( mostly) shows a tolerance build up - but there is also a point where addicts
get enough, and do not have to increase -or else every addict would eventually over-dose ..

You are not thinking this out as usual -you are just regurgitating DEA talking points.
Click to expand...

No I am not you fool.
I have been in recovery since 1983.
You are still using and every comment you make is typical of an addict in denial.
Here is a fact for you; 98% of heroin addicts die from their addiction.
You are so fucking wrong, so ignorant and so dangerous in spreading your untruths in a public forum.
 
anatta said:
Of course you are miles below your potential..but it's better then having no coping abilities.
Click to expand...
No sir I have lived to my full potential. You have no idea what I have done. I don 't sell dime store products by phone, I build monumemtal works of art and sell them to the richest Americans.
 
archives said:
Wrong, wrong, and wrong

Babe Ruth didn't hit all those home runs withou a bat

No gun owner is a criminal till he uses the gun to shoot another, segregating criminals and law abiding gun owners isn't accurate, most shooters were law abiding till they employed the weapon

cherrypicking something someone said is easy, given time anybody could find a quote to support just about any point of view

No one knows what the Founding Fathers were thinking when the put in the Second Amendment, exact reason Scalia felt he was correct in skipping over the Prefatory Clause, which by the way, he wasn't

And if your argument was valid how come it is referred to as the Wild Wild West when everyone did carry a gun?

Admit it, your just afraid of people different from you who in reality you'll probably never see in your life, Attila ain't knocking on hour door
Click to expand...

Right....err...left, no gun owner can be a criminal until he/she uses a gun to commit a crime. Good logic Sherlock.

FYI: It was not the bat that hit all of Ruth's home runs....it was the direction controlled and programmed by the mind of Ruth that projected that skill into the path of the bat used by Ruth. By your logic or the lack thereof....anyone could pick up Ruth's bat and proceed to hit 60 home runs in the major leagues.

But the fact remains....Just like it was not the GUN that killed those individuals at the Ft. Lauderdale air terminal...it was a mentally imbalanced minority individual by the name of Estaban Santiago who killed with the premeditated intent of malice. It must get your goat that you can't use the same bigoted stereotype....it was not a WHITE southern male that committed this crime. Funny as hell.

And of course no one knows the mind of those who drafted and ratified the Constitution and States Bill of Rights...there is no such record as the writings of Thomas Jefferson maintained today with all of the original manuscripts on deposit in the DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND PUBLISHED IN 1853 UNDER AUTHORITY OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS. Nope there is no way of knowing just what these individuals had to say concerning the actual reasons behind the Constitution and States Bill of Rights....the Federalist Papers, a companion to the Constitution's ratification do not exist and explain in detail just why certain rights that are unalienable exist within the Constitution.

But on the bright side...some 200 plus years after the fact we have 'you' that knows everything in greater detail than the original founders of this nation. We must thank you for sharing your gift of psychoanalytic mind reading in knowing what exists in the minds of criminals and other posters on this board. Who needs history actual?

Snow Flake. :good4u:
 
Last edited:
archives said:
No one knows what the Founding Fathers were thinking when the put in the Second Amendment
Click to expand...

there are DOZENS of editorial commentaries by numerous individuals that clearly stated that in order for the people to be ever more powerful than any new central government, or it's standing armies, that every freeman would have any weapon they wanted to and that the federal government had ZERO power to regulate said weapons. This was very clear when the people nominated it's representatives to ratify said bill of rights and constitution.
 
anatta said:
you are not even defining your medical terminology. "Progressive nature" is what? more and more tolerance?
Upto a point.
Any use of any drug ( mostly) shows a tolerance build up - but there is also a point where addicts
get enough, and do not have to increase -or else every addict would eventually over-dose ..

You are not thinking this out as usual -you are just regurgitating DEA talking points.
Click to expand...

tell that to my son who died of an overdose. in other words, you're being a moron.
 
Rune said:
No sir I have lived to my full potential. You have no idea what I have done. I don 't sell dime store products by phone, I build monumemtal works of art and sell them to the richest Americans.
Click to expand...
You build monumental works of fiction as well.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
archives said:
is spending so much time on the Florida shooting, mass shootings are as American as apple pie, they happen so often here Americans have become desensitized. All it takes is a guy with grudge, the tools to make it happen are easily available

And the conservative solution is to have more guns and even easier access to more guns, how's that for Orwellian logic
Click to expand...

if one law abiding citizen had been armed that was trained to use said weapon, we would probably be looking at 2 fatalities, the shooter and one victim
 
anatta said:
you are not even defining your medical terminology. "Progressive nature" is what? more and more tolerance?
Upto a point.
Any use of any drug ( mostly) shows a tolerance build up - but there is also a point where addicts
get enough, and do not have to increase -or else every addict would eventually over-dose ..

You are not thinking this out as usual -you are just regurgitating DEA talking points.
Click to expand...
Are you talking about heroin? In its pure form it is pretty safe, although it is virtually impossible to get on the black market. It is prescribed to addicts over here followed by methadone. I have been told by a few people that methadone is more addictive than heroin. I have never felt the need to use any of that stuff.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
anatta said:
that's way convoluted. I can't kill you- by me using drugs
But if you want to actually get serious here -legalize it all and then the cartels go away too.

Most addicts can find functional levels of work -it actually called functional addiction

http://alcoholrehab.com/drug-addiction/recognize-a-functioning-addict/
Functioning Addict Defined

A functioning addict can be defined as someone who is able to hide the excesses of their alcohol or drug use. An example of this would be the functioning alcoholic who may have a good job, a secure home life, and be respected in the community despite drinking an excessive amount of alcohol most day. To an outsider this individual will be functioning at a high level, but this may be hiding the reality that internally their life is falling apart. This is because addiction always involves a downward spiral even if this decline is well hidden. The functioning addict is sometimes able to maintain their balancing act for many years but eventually things will fall apart – this often happens in dramatic and tragic ways.
Click to expand...

Don't worry, I'm military - I know all about functioning alcoholism.

:shots:
 
SmarterthanYou said:
neither do you, apparently. florida, georgia, louisiana, texas, new mexico, arizona, and nevada do not register weapons. that's just for starters.
Click to expand...

You do understand that he said there are no registrations.
I am not familiar with every state, don't need to be.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
get rid of gun free zones, start making it easier for americans to exercise their rights, and stop demonizing guns and gun possession. you'll see mass shootings go down tremendously
Click to expand...
Well I was thinking that if guns were allowed in redneck bars, they would save the police some bullets.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Milagro said:
Well I was thinking that if guns were allowed in redneck bars, they would save the police some bullets.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Sure saves the liberals a lot of bullets in our democrat controlled, major cities.
 
Milagro said:
They would end up shooting each other when drunk, saves everybody alit if time and effort. I also feel that's the true reason why black gangs are not pursued as actively as possible.
Click to expand...

granted, i don't spend much time in 'redneck' bars, but here in TX, there's hardly any shootings in bars or restaurants, unless the cops start it like in waco. so maybe you're presumptions are entirely based on your prejudice?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top