detailed look at Russian hacking

signalmankenneth said:
Cz_3TY9VIAALUWc.jpg
Click to expand...

how many Russians entered a voting booth without an ID?......
 
Yaya said:
Fuck off, you can't take my citizenship.

You're a worthless troll who just keeps repeating lies in the meager hope someone would believe it.
Click to expand...

^^^^ Yoyo has a hissy fit. Your boy Trumpkins is not well liked. Hope that doesn't make you cry. Waaaaaaaa. For him to continually stick up for Russia in unpatriotic. Looks like you are following in his footsteps.
 
Brain Food said:
^^^^ Yoyo has a hissy fit. Your boy Trumpkins is not well liked. Hope that doesn't make you cry. Waaaaaaaa. For him to continually stick up for Russia in unpatriotic. Looks like you are following in his footsteps.
Click to expand...

Please shut the fuck up, your constant litany of spurious bullshit and emotional bedwetting is truly beyond belief. Clinton was responsible for her own demise, even her own people say so!!

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world...mp-victory-Russia-Putin-Democrat-Karen-Finney

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
evince said:
http://whdh.com/news/us-gives-detailed-look-at-russias-alleged-election-hacking/




US gives detailed look at Russia’s alleged election hacking

7 News WHDH
WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. has released its most detailed report yet on accusations that Russia interfered in the U.S. presidential election by hacking American political sites and email accounts.
The 13-page joint analysis by the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI is the first such report ever to attribute malicious cyber activity to a particular country or actors.
It was also the first time the U.S. has officially and specifically tied intrusions into the Democratic National Committee to hackers with the Russian civilian and military intelligence services, the FSB and GRU, expanding on an Oct. 7 accusation by the Obama administration.
The report said the intelligence services were involved in “an ongoing campaign of cyber-enabled operations directed at the U.S. government and its citizens.” It added, “In some cases, (the Russian intelligence services’) actors masqueraded as third parties, hiding behind false online personas designed to cause the victim to misattribute the source of the attack.”
Last summer, stolen emails from Democrats were posted by an online persona known as Guccifer 2.0, believed by U.S. officials to be linked to Russia. Outrage over documents that appeared to show favoritism for Hillary Clinton forced the DNC’s chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, to resign.
The U.S. released the technical report Thursday as President Barack Obama sanctioned the GRU and the FSB, the GRU’s leadership and companies which the U.S. said support the GRU.
The sanctions were the administration’s first use of a 2015 executive order for combatting cyberattacks against critical infrastructure and commercial espionage. Because election systems aren’t considered critical infrastructure, Obama amended the order Thursday to allow for sanctions on entities “interfering with or undermining election processes or institutions.”
The retaliation against Russia, just weeks before President-elect Donald Trump takes office, culminated months of political handwringing about how and whether to respond to Moscow’s alleged meddling. U.S. intelligence agencies concluded that Russia’s goal was to help Trump win — an assessment Trump has dismissed as ridiculous. Trump said Thursday the U.S. should move on, but that he would meet with the intelligence community’s leaders next week for an update on the situation.
The report did not go far beyond confirming details already disclosed by cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which was hired to investigate the DNC hacks.
It described the intelligence services’ use of “spearphishing” — fake emails intended to trick victims into typing in their user names and passwords. At least one person opened attachments with malicious software. The report noted that actors “likely associated” with Russian intelligence services are continuing to engage in spearphishing campaigns, including one launched just days after the U.S. election.
The DNC was infiltrated by the FSB in summer 2015 and again by the GRU in spring 2016 using spearphishing emails that often appeared to come from legitimate or official organizations, the report said.
Russian officials have denied any involvement in hacking U.S. political sites and emails.
The report provided clues, or pieces of code left behind by hackers, cybersecurity workers in the private sector could look for to identify compromised systems and prevent more intrusions. The Department of Homeland Security said it has already included this information within its own cyber threat information-sharing program, which automatically flags threats in real time for participating companies and agencies.
Releasing such a report was a political twist on the administration’s strategy of “name and shame,” in place since 2012 and used to bring indictments against Chinese military hackers for economic espionage and Iranian hackers for an attack on banks and a small dam in New York. It was also a far more detailed and sophisticated telling of Russia’s hacking, with technical indicators of compromise, compared to the spare technical details released after the Obama administration publicly blamed North Korea for a cyberattack against Sony Pictures Entertainment.
U.S. officials also provided antivirus vendors with two malicious software samples used by Russian intelligence services
Click to expand...

what does it gain trump to trash our intel people?
 
evince said:
what does it gain trump to trash our intel people?
Click to expand...
Nobody is trashing our intel people. The fact that russia(and other bad actors), have been hacking and attempting to hack ALL facets of the western cyber infrastructure seems to come as a big surprise to you. That's okay because you are just a butthurt moron. But you're doing your job, which is waving your arms and shouting about the hacking. You think that is deflecting from the content that was uncovered by the hackers. I am afraid not. If it makes you feel any better, the contents of those leaks only confirmed that HRC, the DNC and their assorted minions were moronic deceitful pieces of shit , they did not change many minds in the voting booth(neither did Comey, BTW). Two more FACTS: When these attacks became known in 2015, Reince Priebus immediately called in the FBI for a cyber security consultation, and implemented their recommendations. Consequently, the RNC and their assorted minions may very well be moronic deceitful pieces of shit, but we will never know, because any hacking attempts were unsuccessful. Fact #2: HRC was the biggest cyber security moron in politics. The body of evidence to support this is readily available and won't be repeated here. Oh, and to be helpful, the standard Rx for butthurt is to rub the tears of lib celebrities who promised to leave the U.S. if Trump won but didn't, into your ass. Sorry desh, there's not much help for an adult moron.
 
Still cracks one up how conservatives are in a complete state of denial when it comes to Russia, the nation they once told us was Armageddon on earth, interfering in the US election.

Common sense dictates that even if it was only a possibility a full investigation is merited
 
archives said:
Still cracks one up how conservatives are in a complete state of denial when it comes to Russia, the nation they once told us was Armageddon on earth, interfering in the US election.

Common sense dictates that even if it was only a possibility a full investigation is merited
Click to expand...
WTF?...For the last time(from me, anyways)nobody is in a "complete state of denial when it comes to russia", they hack EVERYONE! They've done it for a long time. "Investigate" until you turn blue, know what you're going to find?: The russians hack into people's computers!
 
Hillary Destroyer said:
How did Russia "hack our election"?

What did they hack?

How did it specifically impact the election?

Please be specific
Click to expand...

As I said, "cracks you up," ah, to say Russia had no impact would be saying the entire Wikileaks drip had no effect, which if true would make the entire right wing media look like clowns cause that is what they centered upon in their overt efforts to defeat Clinton

And, above and beyond it all, it has been established that Russia's spy network hacked the US electorial institutions, which on its' own merits a complete investigation, we were attacked by a foreign nation.

(And please, spare us the lame "they all do it" deflection, it's bogus)
 
archives said:
Still cracks one up how conservatives are in a complete state of denial when it comes to Russia, the nation they once told us was Armageddon on earth, interfering in the US election.

Common sense dictates that even if it was only a possibility a full investigation is merited
Click to expand...

:thisisgettinggood:
 
callinectes said:
WTF?...For the last time(from me, anyways)nobody is in a "complete state of denial when it comes to russia", they hack EVERYONE! They've done it for a long time. "Investigate" until you turn blue, know what you're going to find?: The russians hack into people's computers!
Click to expand...
:eek2::eek2:

They do? OMG!
 
archives said:
As I said, "cracks you up," ah, to say Russia had no impact would be saying the entire Wikileaks drip had no effect, which if true would make the entire right wing media look like clowns cause that is what they centered upon in their overt efforts to defeat Clinton

And, above and beyond it all, it has been established that Russia's spy network hacked the US electorial institutions, which on its' own merits a complete investigation, we were attacked by a foreign nation.

(And please, spare us the lame "they all do it" deflection, it's bogus)
Click to expand...

Maybe you didn't understand my question. Maybe you really don't understand what is being fed to you?

You say our electoral institutions were hacked? What specifically was hacked? How did it impact the outcome of the election?

This is your opportunity to educate us all with your grasp of the topic. Please be as specific as possible
 
Hillary Destroyer said:
Maybe you didn't understand my question. Maybe you really don't understand what is being fed to you?

You say our electoral institutions were hacked? What specifically was hacked? How did it impact the outcome of the election?

This is your opportunity to educate us all with your grasp of the topic. Please be as specific as possible
Click to expand...

Unwarranted leaps in logic are a real bitch ain't they?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top