Dershowitz: Obama Will Go Down In History As One Of The Worst Foreign Policy Pres...

Milagro said:
Why are you such a massive effing dildo? Is it the vast quantities of dope you smoke that makes you act like a paranoid petulant child? Do you know that George Michael also smoked huge amounts and nearly died in 2011 from pneumonia?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Eat shit
 
"ISIS began during Billy Bob Clinton's term." GQ #94
Click to expand...
oh?
a) I haven't found a single Google hit for any ISIL reference prior to Bush's inauguration.

b) One of the S' in ISIL stands for "State".

BUT !!

"State" is a geo-political designation. In this case the "geo-" bears.

Please identify the geographical location ISIL maintained sovereign control over before President Bush (younger) took office.

Thanks.
"The US fought and won all the major cities in Iraq under Bush."
Click to expand...
YES!
At GINORMOUS cost, at the gain of virtually nothing!

c5725774c467b13b9b8771277ae74b7774e6098.JPG

"Now the US is once again in Iraq, refighting those same battles."
Click to expand...
Glad you're willing to confess it.

And we wouldn't have to be doing so a SECOND time if we'd taken the conservative approach I've advocated since before the start, instead of the liberal position you're defending here.
"American people are friends of Liberty everywhere, but custodians only of their own." John Adams
Click to expand...
"Blame who you like." GQ #94

That's a simplistic admonition, with a rather more subtle reality.

In this case I don't "blame". Instead I acknowledge cause & effect.

President Bush (younger) should never have lied U.S. into War in the first place.
"Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt, that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised."
U.S. President Bush (the younger) televised address to the U.S. March 17th, 2003
Click to expand...
It is impossible for that to be anything but a lie.
"Of course he had a choice ffs, he could have told the Iraqis to go fuck themselves. Instead he just couldn't get out quick enough and used that excuse to cut and run." M #97
Click to expand...
That you include that in the list of options is revealing.
It might be a "choice".
It is an unethical choice.

The Bush administration removed Iraq's national defense.
To then toss the Iraqis to the wolves & jackals in the Middle East would have been tantamount to mass-murder.

FYI
Once a super-power removes a nation's own defenses; that super-power is obliged to substitute its own, until that invaded / conquered nation has a viable replacement under its own sovereign control.

NONE of that would be an issue if the Bush invasion of Iraq had never taken place.
 
OldMercsRule said:
"Dershowitz: Obama Will Go Down In History As One Of The Worst Foreign Policy Presidents Ever

Posted By Tim Hains
On Date December 26, 2016

Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz slammed President Obama for "stabbing Israel in the back" on Monday morning's edition of 'Fox & Friends.'

"[History will see President Obama] as one of the worst foreign policy presidents ever," Dershowitz said.

"He called me into the Oval Office before the inauguration -- he said he wanted my support, and he told me he would always have Israel's back," Dershowitz said. "I didn't realize what he meant: That he would have Israel's back so he could stab them in the back."

He continued: "What he did was so nasty, he pulled a bait and switch. He told the American public this is all about the settlements deep in the West Bank. And yet, he allowed he representative to the U.N. to abstain --which is really a vote for-- a resolution that says the Jews can't pray at the Western Wall, Jews can't live in the Jewish Quarter [of Jerusalem] where they have lived for thousands of years. And he's going to say, 'Whoops! I didn't mean that!' Well read the resolution! You're a lawyer, you went to Harvard Law School."

He also said: "This will make peace much more difficult to achieve because the Palestinians will now say 'we can get a state through the UN'.""

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...the_worst_foreign_policy_presidents_ever.html

Obamaprompter is the worst foreign policy POTUS in US history.

A small arrogant nasty back stabbing man with a huge chip on his shoulder, does what he can to put his country in the ditch.

His eight years in office will be seen as a nasty shit stain on American History.
Click to expand...

Lol. Dershowitz the foreign policy expert.

His opinion has no more significance than that of anybody else.
 
domer76 said:
You're an historical ignoramus.
Click to expand...

Nope my knowledge of history is spot on, yer the one called dummer.

domer76 said:
Drop the labels, you fucking moron, and focus on the political philosophy.
Click to expand...

The political philosophy of modern Liberal/Progressive/Marxist/Statist/Fascist dim wit Democrats, (who are all about 'labels' and identity politics), is to destroy personal Liberty at the expense of a massive central gubment bureaucracy.

domer76 said:
Your Jim Crow, Kkk and slave owner were CONSERVATIVES.
Click to expand...

Nope: they were all official policies of the dim wit Democtrat party (of slavery, kkk, jim crow, treason, felony, sovereign bankruptcy and divisiveness), modern Cornservatives champion personal Liberty and limited gubment, not: slavery.

domer76 said:
You're a conservative, too, aren't you? Good company.
Click to expand...

Yuppers, I'm a limited gubment pro personal Liberty Cornservative, (same as a classical Liberal), not the modern version of the term which now means Statist/Fascist.
 
OldMercsRule said:
He is far worse then Carter. At least Carter would try new tactics after a big fail.

Obamaprompter arrogantly sticks to his stupid policies 'til they burn the place down.
Click to expand...

At least Carter would punt on 4th down and 25. Obama tries the same up the middle run that hasn't work once. Obama would rather lose than admit he was wrong and regroup.
 
"At least Carter would punt on 4th down and 25. Obama tries the same up the middle run that hasn't work once." CM #109

Barack & Michelle have been an impressive duo.

Bill & Hill have too.

BUT !!

Bill put Hillary in charge of expanding healthcare, and they failed. That proves what a daunting task it was.

Without putting Michelle in charge, Barack rammed ACA through congress, & into law. Even Boehner & McConnell couldn't stop him.

"Obama tries the same up the middle run that hasn't work once." CM #109

It failed, as in filling the vacant SCOTUS seat, and in closing GITMO.

But it has also succeeded. So your "hasn't work once" rhetoric is obviously factually false.
 
OldMercsRule said:
Nope my knowledge of history is spot on, yer the one called dummer.



The political philosophy of modern Liberal/Progressive/Marxist/Statist/Fascist dim wit Democrats, (who are all about 'labels' and identity politics), is to destroy personal Liberty at the expense of a massive central gubment bureaucracy.



Nope: they were all official policies of the dim wit Democtrat party (of slavery, kkk, jim crow, treason, felony, sovereign bankruptcy and divisiveness), modern Cornservatives champion personal Liberty and limited gubment, not: slavery.



Yuppers, I'm a limited gubment pro personal Liberty Cornservative, (same as a classical Liberal), not the modern version of the term which now means Statist/Fascist.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the validation. The ignoramus label stands. Next step? Imbecile.
 
OldMercsRule said:
Yup... You have proven that below average rocks have far more smarts then you do: dummer.



The ol' dummer talks to hisef as he gazes in the ol' mirror... burp...

One extra stupid dolt...
Click to expand...

Congrats. You just seamlessly moved into the imbecile category. Actually, you were always there. I was just trying to give you a little slack.
 
"Dershowitz the foreign policy expert.
His opinion has no more significance than that of anybody else." c9 #106

The timing is revealing.

a) [surprise surprise] Dershowitz is Jewish, and a sycophant to Israel.

b) The topic condemnation follows Obama's improved position on Israeli expansionist policy into Palestinian land.

All that shifts it from the objective, to the subjective.

Dershowitz isn't defending a principle here. He's defending his own bias.
 
OldMercsRule said:
Nope my knowledge of history is spot on, yer the one called dummer.



The political philosophy of modern Liberal/Progressive/Marxist/Statist/Fascist dim wit Democrats, (who are all about 'labels' and identity politics), is to destroy personal Liberty at the expense of a massive central gubment bureaucracy.



Nope: they were all official policies of the dim wit Democtrat party (of slavery, kkk, jim crow, treason, felony, sovereign bankruptcy and divisiveness), modern Cornservatives champion personal Liberty and limited gubment, not: slavery.



Yuppers, I'm a limited gubment pro personal Liberty Cornservative, (same as a classical Liberal), not the modern version of the term which now means Statist/Fascist.
Click to expand...

these are all flat out baseless fucking lies


you are a tool
 
sear said:
"Dershowitz the foreign policy expert.
His opinion has no more significance than that of anybody else." c9 #106

The timing is revealing.

a) [surprise surprise] Dershowitz is Jewish, and a sycophant to Israel.

b) The topic condemnation follows Obama's improved position on Israeli expansionist policy into Palestinian land.

All that shifts it from the objective, to the subjective.

Dershowitz isn't defending a principle here. He's defending his own bias.
Click to expand...
Dershowitz is an American Jew. After losing over 1,000 government positions during his tenure, do you think it wise of Obama to alienate such a huge voting bloc as the American Jews? Not only their financial contributions to the Party, but their acknowledged influence over the msm?
 
GazzaQueen said:
Dershowitz is an American Jew. After losing over 1,000 government positions during his tenure, do you think it wise of Obama to alienate such a huge voting bloc as the American Jews? Not only their financial contributions to the Party, but their acknowledged influence over the msm?
Click to expand...

Massive TARD has infected the dim wit Democrats, (Obamaprompter) and media so badly they are doin' all sorts of upside down things.

Hopefully the toilet gets a big flush.
 
"After losing over 1,000 government positions during his tenure, do you think it wise of Obama to alienate such a huge voting bloc as the American Jews?" GQ
Not if sucking up to the electorate is the reason he's taken the highest office in the land.

BUT !!

If instead Obama is more interested in noble principle than shallow politics, then your challenge issue is irrelevant.

In this case:
what I've read of it indicates Israel's / Netanyahu's expansion into Palestine this way is illegal.
Do you really think it's wrong for a U.S. president to actually take a principled stand?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top