It wasn't that long ago that conservatives told us Hillary was crooked, corrupt, and

archives said:
"It was very corrupt," but you, nor the demagogues you listen to can show us any evidence to prove it is/was corrupt, and to think that a multi million dollar charity isn't influential is naive.
Click to expand...
Hillary Clinton on foundation: ‘There’s a lot of smoke and there’s no fire’
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ke-and-theres-no-fire/?utm_term=.6c24c52990f7
Click to expand...
lol, she's such a blatant and serial liar she tries to reword a saying as old as the hills and thinks we're dumb enough to buy it. And you blame Comey, the Russians (why doesn't anyone come up with the idea those two colluded?), racists, basket of deplorables now I'm seeing Huma's name come up. It goes on and on. You fucks put up the one person that would piss off republicans the most and for no other reason . Same with the repubs.
I yelled at repubs for nominating the worst possible person they could because they would've easily beat Hrc with anybody else.
And you fucks also put up the worst possible person. You would've beaten trump with Webb, O'Malley or Bernie.
But no. Dems and repubs both nominated the worst of the worst playing a high stakes game of chicken. Well, congratulations, game well played, you get a participation trophy, won CA by a landslide. Blame yourselves for nominating a horrendous candidate.
Now you have to live with the result.

You should read (or reread) milagro's thread which apparently no one paid attention to:
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...Donald-Trump-%96-and-how-he-could-destroy-her
 
Last edited:
aloysious said:
You don't dance on the grave of your opponents.
It would reek of third world politics.

Anecdotally, I fired an employee who had stolen my DEA information and was writing narcotic Rx's. Did a police report on her.
After she was gone I discovered she had stolen about $2000 by forging my signature on checks assigned to me. I could have gotten her into more trouble but in the end it wasn't worth my time and effort.
She was going through enough hell of her own having not only been fired but going through a class C felony conviction.

Not quite the same with hrc, but she's suddenly cut off cold turkey from the smug power addiction she's had for what, 30, 40 yrs. now? She's in her own living hell at the moment and probably will be for the rest of her miserable short remaining 'life'.
Click to expand...
Yes but what about Martha Stewart? If anyone else put the country at risk out of sheer arrogance, they'd be locked up right now. Personally I'd love to see that condescending wench in a orange jumpsuit.
 
archives said:
deserved to be "locked up," but not only wasn't any of the Clinton innuendos ever been proven valid, but now the "investigating" entities responsible for those innuendos are either fading or formally disbanding, amazing how their fervor and "dedication" to determining the truth has so suddenly dissipated

Now what do you suppose is up with that?
Click to expand...

this is what happens when you just let News lie to people


thanks fox
 
archives said:
So now she's not guilty enough to "be locked up," two months ago she rivaled Al Capone but now she's not worthy of attention, too funny

And don't fool yourself, the Clintons are hardly hurting, remember, they have the influential Foundation, the one two months ago you told us was corrupt
Click to expand...

Oh yes the Clinton's are hurting. The azz-whooping Hillary took will hurt til she dies. I can only imagine what kind of hell life must be with multimillion dollar donors wondering when they're getting their money back, or for that matter the sheer torture wondering when they'll call in their marks.

Makes the IRS look like a 2nd rate collection agency.
 
Midas Whale67 said:
Oh yes the Clinton's are hurting. The azz-whooping Hillary took will hurt til she dies. I can only imagine what kind of hell life must be with multimillion dollar donors wondering when they're getting their money back, or for that matter the sheer torture wondering when they'll call in their marks.

Makes the IRS look like a 2nd rate collection agency.
Click to expand...

Now that is funny, yeah, the Clintons' life now "is hell," and just to help you out, the likes of Rupert Murdoch, the Murdoch family, the Bush family, Fox television, and Fox corporation are all million dollar donors to the Clinton Foundation.

You definitely got to turn off your radio and get out more
 
Deplorable Me said:
Yes but what about Martha Stewart? If anyone else put the country at risk out of sheer arrogance, they'd be locked up right now. Personally I'd love to see that condescending wench in a orange jumpsuit.
Click to expand...
I agree, hrc belongs in jail, should've spent time there when in AR. I just don't think it's practical to go after her at this point. I'm satisfied that a wooden stake has been put through the heart of the Clinton Political Machine at long last.
I suspect they'll still annoyingly be in our faces, they tend to never go away, but they'll be looked at as a parody of themselves trying to be relevant.
 
aloysious said:
I agree, hrc belongs in jail, should've spent time there when in AR. I just don't think it's practical to go after her at this point. I'm satisfied that a wooden stake has been put through the heart of the Clinton Political Machine at long last.
I suspect they'll still annoyingly be in our faces, they tend to never go away, but they'll be looked at as a parody of themselves trying to be relevant.
Click to expand...
ya.although there ARE people locked up solely for "gross negligence" with no intent to do harm.
If she skates on this - so be it. a small price to get rid of her once and for all for the good of the nation.

Military Prosecutions Show That a Gross Negligence Prosecution Would Not Unfairly Single Out Mrs. Clinton
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corne...nce-prosecution-would-not-unfairly-single-out
 
archives said:
deserved to be "locked up," but not only wasn't any of the Clinton innuendos ever been proven valid, but now the "investigating" entities responsible for those innuendos are either fading or formally disbanding, amazing how their fervor and "dedication" to determining the truth has so suddenly dissipated

Now what do you suppose is up with that?
Click to expand...

not only wasn't any of the Clinton innuendos ever been proven valid, but now the "investigating" entities responsible for those innuendos are either fading or formally disbanding ?


You know what they say about 'counting your chickens, etc....'

You might want review Comey's testimony under oath before Congress....Not tried for a crime does not equal 'not guilty'.....
 
archives said:
deserved to be "locked up," but not only wasn't any of the Clinton innuendos ever been proven valid, but now the "investigating" entities responsible for those innuendos are either fading or formally disbanding, amazing how their fervor and "dedication" to determining the truth has so suddenly dissipated

Now what do you suppose is up with that?
Click to expand...

i think hillary should be in jail and possibly executed. But in case you haven't noticed the nation is pretty besides themselves right now, so in the spirit of good will we let her escape justice for her crimes as long as she shuts the fuck up and goes back to netflix.
 
it's really funny how liberals are trying to goad trump into going after clinton. Then in the same breath they unironically say how trump can be baited by a tweet and can easily go off the rails at any moment. Maybe if you actually believe that you should be careful what you wish for.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top