It wasn't that long ago that conservatives told us Hillary was crooked, corrupt, and

A

archives

Verified User
deserved to be "locked up," but not only wasn't any of the Clinton innuendos ever been proven valid, but now the "investigating" entities responsible for those innuendos are either fading or formally disbanding, amazing how their fervor and "dedication" to determining the truth has so suddenly dissipated

Now what do you suppose is up with that?
 
archives said:
deserved to be "locked up," but not only wasn't any of the Clinton innuendos ever been proven valid, but now the "investigating" entities responsible for those innuendos are either fading or formally disbanding, amazing how their fervor and "dedication" to determining the truth has so suddenly dissipated

Now what do you suppose is up with that?
Click to expand...

Didn't you already start a thread about this?....who are you?....Legion?....
 
archives said:
deserved to be "locked up," but not only wasn't any of the Clinton innuendos ever been proven valid, but now the "investigating" entities responsible for those innuendos are either fading or formally disbanding, amazing how their fervor and "dedication" to determining the truth has so suddenly dissipated

Now what do you suppose is up with that?
Click to expand...

We'll see what happens in the first 100 days after Trump's inauguration.
 
Both the FBI and the State Department have ongoing investigations re: The Clintons. As far as I know, neither entity is breaking up.
 
archives said:
deserved to be "locked up," but not only wasn't any of the Clinton innuendos ever been proven valid, but now the "investigating" entities responsible for those innuendos are either fading or formally disbanding, amazing how their fervor and "dedication" to determining the truth has so suddenly dissipated

Now what do you suppose is up with that?
Click to expand...
You don't dance on the grave of your opponents.
It would reek of third world politics.

Anecdotally, I fired an employee who had stolen my DEA information and was writing narcotic Rx's. Did a police report on her.
After she was gone I discovered she had stolen about $2000 by forging my signature on checks assigned to me. I could have gotten her into more trouble but in the end it wasn't worth my time and effort.
She was going through enough hell of her own having not only been fired but going through a class C felony conviction.

Not quite the same with hrc, but she's suddenly cut off cold turkey from the smug power addiction she's had for what, 30, 40 yrs. now? She's in her own living hell at the moment and probably will be for the rest of her miserable short remaining 'life'.
 
Last edited:
aloysious said:
You don't dance on the grave of your opponents.
It would reek of third world politics.

Anecdotally, I fired an employee who had stolen my DEA information and was writing narcotic Rx's. Did a police report on her.
After she was gone I discovered she had stolen about $2000 by forging my signature on checks assigned to me. I could have gotten her into more trouble but in the end it wasn't worth my time and effort.
She was going through enough hell of her own having not only been fired but going through a class C felony conviction.

Not quite the same with hrc, but she's suddenly cut off cold turkey from the smug power addiction she's had for what, 30, 40 yrs. now? She's in her own living hell at the moment and probably will be for the rest of her miserable short remaining 'life'.
Click to expand...

So now she's not guilty enough to "be locked up," two months ago she rivaled Al Capone but now she's not worthy of attention, too funny

And don't fool yourself, the Clintons are hardly hurting, remember, they have the influential Foundation, the one two months ago you told us was corrupt
 
cawacko said:
Remember when liberals wanted Bush locked up for war crimes and Obama said let's move on...
Click to expand...

Obama never campaigned on the promise to "lock Bush up," nor did his followers chant it anywhere in his campaign, your stretching, but don't give up now
 
archives said:
And don't fool yourself, the Clintons are hardly hurting,
Click to expand...
Not financially, of course not. But it's power and influence they're addicted to.
archives said:
remember, they have the influential Foundation, the one two months ago you told us was corrupt
Click to expand...
It was influential but no more. It has no more influence to peddle and yes, it was very corrupt. If it has no political influence to peddle anymore it can't be corrupt.
 
aloysious said:
Not financially, of course not. But it's power and influence they're addicted to. It was influential but no more. It has no more influence to peddle and yes, it was very corrupt. If it has no political influence to peddle anymore it can't be corrupt.
Click to expand...

"It was very corrupt," but you, nor the demagogues you listen to can show us any evidence to prove it is/was corrupt, and to think that a multi million dollar charity isn't influential is naive.
 
archives said:
deserved to be "locked up," but not only wasn't any of the Clinton innuendos ever been proven valid, but now the "investigating" entities responsible for those innuendos are either fading or formally disbanding, amazing how their fervor and "dedication" to determining the truth has so suddenly dissipated

Now what do you suppose is up with that?
Click to expand...

In the U.S. the tradition is unlike the Third World nations that put political opponents in prison regularly. So long as she will no longer hold any power and the U.S. is safe, it is best to let it go. Although, there still is an investigation going on with her "charity".
 
aloysious said:
You don't dance on the grave of your opponents.
It would reek of third world politics.

Anecdotally, I fired an employee who had stolen my DEA information and was writing narcotic Rx's. Did a police report on her.
After she was gone I discovered she had stolen about $2000 by forging my signature on checks assigned to me. I could have gotten her into more trouble but in the end it wasn't worth my time and effort.
She was going through enough hell of her own having not only been fired but going through a class C felony conviction.

Not quite the same with hrc, but she's suddenly cut off cold turkey from the smug power addiction she's had for what, 30, 40 yrs. now? She's in her own living hell at the moment and probably will be for the rest of her miserable short remaining 'life'.
Click to expand...

Short answer: trump lied. As usual. His supporters are still chanting "lock her up" and he still loves it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top