ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTE TALLY THREAD

What are the state laws, I am not familiar with them.

You can't force an elector to vote the way you want....if they take the oath to vote for your side, and do, all well and good

If they don't vote the party line, they can be fined

The party can remove and replace a voter that won't promise to toe the party line...BEFORE the election.

Thats a Supreme Court ruling I believe....

Democrats have shown themselves to be hypocrites once again.....
 
U.S. Supreme Court
The constitutionality of state pledge laws was confirmed by the Supreme Court in 1952 in Ray v. Blair in a 5–2 vote. The court ruled states have the right to require electors to pledge to vote for the candidate whom their party supports, and the right to remove potential electors who refuse to pledge prior to the election.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_elector
 
hillary-clinton-crying-364x205.jpg
 
Texas seals the deal for Trump

Current tally
304 for Trump and not enough for Hillary

It's over, stick a fork in the liberals; because they are done, :D

This is a perfect example of what needs to be said to the liberals:


So let's see if Hillary will accept the EC voting outcome and what the final tally will be; because after the election night, it was Trump 290 and Hillary 218.

Well; it looks like the final tally for today, was Trump 288 and Hillary 214.

The two who refused to vote for Trump, will be replaced; but the 4 who wouldn't vote for Hillary will stand.
 
You can't force an elector to vote the way you want....if they take the oath to vote for your side, and do, all well and good

If they don't vote the party line, they can be fined

The party can remove and replace a voter that won't promise to toe the party line...BEFORE the election.

Thats a Supreme Court ruling I believe....

Democrats have shown themselves to be hypocrites once again.....

I think it depends on state law...
 
You know why they voted for Colin Powell, right? If there was nobody who got 270 the Congress has to select from the top 3 of the Electoral vote. So, they needed somebody who had some votes just in case they could somehow pull off this nonsense.
 
U.S. Supreme Court
The constitutionality of state pledge laws was confirmed by the Supreme Court in 1952 in Ray v. Blair in a 5–2 vote. The court ruled states have the right to require electors to pledge to vote for the candidate whom their party supports, and the right to remove potential electors who refuse to pledge prior to the election.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_elector

Only 29 States have those laws.

Trump had a net gain of 3 electors as the old hillbag lost More faithless electors. Woohoo!
 
Well; it looks like the final tally for today, was Trump 288 and Hillary 214.

The two who refused to vote for Trump, will be replaced; but the 4 who wouldn't vote for Hillary will stand.

mo those 2 will stand as well as the 4.

All those who were going to be replaced have been already.
 
Shall we patiently await for the DOJ to rush out and investigate the obvious attacks on the EC voters? Where is the people's party...the protector of democracy? I conclude there will be no investigation from this administration for the act of voter suppression as well stocking, death threats, hate speech:) etc. But....Jan.21, 2017 is not that far removed from these attacks. Its time to JAIL the radical anarchists and demonstrate to them just what the RULE OF LAW means in a free republic.

Elections have consequences...and one of those consequences could possibly be prison time for a few radicals. The idiots have left a paper trail that Ray Charles could follow....Hes blind and dead.
 
oh he wants to go all philipino on people

Heads should role for these acts of sedition....jail would be to good. As I said, these idiots have left a paper trail anyone could follow and there will be no left wing lackey heading the DOJ this time around. Its all documented with IP addresses and a few of the EC voters said they used their cell phone cameras to get the licence plates of the one's stocking the EC voters and threatening lives.

The nation has finally been exposed to the real DEMOCRAT PARTY. :) This is no joke...these are serious crimes with serious jail time for things ranging from the attempt to suppress voting rights, to threatening their lives, to stalking to the very act of engaging in hate crimes. :clink:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top