Podesta suggests Trump associates may have colluded with Russian hackers

anatta

100% recycled karma
Former Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta said Sunday he believes that Donald Trump's associates may have colluded with Russian hackers to win the election.

In his first TV interview since Hillary Clinton's loss, Podesta said he doesn't believe that the president-elect himself was part of the plan but suggested some of his associates may have gone off the reservation. The Electoral College electors, he said, have the right to know the extent of the Trump campaign's involvement before they cast their votes Monday.

"It's very much unknown whether there was collusion," Podesta said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

"What did Trump Inc. know? When did they know it? Were they in touch with the Russians?" Podesta asked. "I think the electors have the right to know what the answers are."

"The Russians were trying to elect a lap dog," Podesta said, referring to a recent piece by New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof.

Podesta also offered new details on the hacking of his private Gmail account, saying he wasn't contacted by the FBI until Oct. 9, two days after WikiLeaks started releasing his emails.

"The first thing the agent said to me is, 'I don't know if you're aware, but your email account might have been hacked,'" Podesta said. "I said, 'Yes, I was aware of that.'"

"That was the last time I talked to the FBI," Podesta added.

odesta accepted a share of the blame for Clinton's loss, though, conceding the campaign wasn't aggressive enough in some Midwestern states. Democrats should put together a detailed postmortem report, he said, similar to what Republicans did after Mitt Romney's loss in 2012.

“We owe it to our supporters to say what we think we did right, what we think we did wrong," Podesta said. "I think [in] Wisconsin we could have done better. There’s no question about it.”

“At the end of the day, we also lost Pennsylvania, and there is nothing we left … undone there, and we still lost by 44,000 votes," he added.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/podesta-trump-russian-hackers-232786
 
"It's very much unknown whether there was collusion," Podesta said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

"What did Trump Inc. know? When did they know it? Were they in touch with the Russians?" Podesta asked. "I think the electors have the right to know what the answers are."
baseless speculation in a pathetic attempt to justify his loss and destroy Trump's presidency.
The entire Clinton campaign -including Clinton herself - is running around with hair on fire attempts to destroy Trump before he is sworn in.

we know he extent of Russian hacking. It's not more then anything fed to WIKILEAKS ( if that); the Clinton Emails were released by State.

If I were a Democrat, i'd disown this entire process of de-legitimization. It's more then sour gapes- it's an attack on the democratic process.
 
Former Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta said Sunday he believes that Donald Trump's associates may have colluded with Russian hackers to win the election.

In his first TV interview since Hillary Clinton's loss, Podesta said he doesn't believe that the president-elect himself was part of the plan but suggested some of his associates may have gone off the reservation. The Electoral College electors, he said, have the right to know the extent of the Trump campaign's involvement before they cast their votes Monday.

"It's very much unknown whether there was collusion," Podesta said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

"What did Trump Inc. know? When did they know it? Were they in touch with the Russians?" Podesta asked. "I think the electors have the right to know what the answers are."

"The Russians were trying to elect a lap dog," Podesta said, referring to a recent piece by New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof.

Podesta also offered new details on the hacking of his private Gmail account, saying he wasn't contacted by the FBI until Oct. 9, two days after WikiLeaks started releasing his emails.

"The first thing the agent said to me is, 'I don't know if you're aware, but your email account might have been hacked,'" Podesta said. "I said, 'Yes, I was aware of that.'"

"That was the last time I talked to the FBI," Podesta added.

odesta accepted a share of the blame for Clinton's loss, though, conceding the campaign wasn't aggressive enough in some Midwestern states. Democrats should put together a detailed postmortem report, he said, similar to what Republicans did after Mitt Romney's loss in 2012.

“We owe it to our supporters to say what we think we did right, what we think we did wrong," Podesta said. "I think [in] Wisconsin we could have done better. There’s no question about it.”

“At the end of the day, we also lost Pennsylvania, and there is nothing we left … undone there, and we still lost by 44,000 votes," he added.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/podesta-trump-russian-hackers-232786

I love the catch phrases that are now bolded, in your post.
 
Former Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta said Sunday he believes that Donald Trump's associates may have colluded with Russian hackers to win the election.

In his first TV interview since Hillary Clinton's loss, Podesta said he doesn't believe that the president-elect himself was part of the plan but suggested some of his associates may have gone off the reservation. The Electoral College electors, he said, have the right to know the extent of the Trump campaign's involvement before they cast their votes Monday.

"It's very much unknown whether there was collusion," Podesta said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

"What did Trump Inc. know? When did they know it? Were they in touch with the Russians?" Podesta asked. "I think the electors have the right to know what the answers are."

"The Russians were trying to elect a lap dog," Podesta said, referring to a recent piece by New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof.

Podesta also offered new details on the hacking of his private Gmail account, saying he wasn't contacted by the FBI until Oct. 9, two days after WikiLeaks started releasing his emails.

"The first thing the agent said to me is, 'I don't know if you're aware, but your email account might have been hacked,'" Podesta said. "I said, 'Yes, I was aware of that.'"

"That was the last time I talked to the FBI," Podesta added.

odesta accepted a share of the blame for Clinton's loss, though, conceding the campaign wasn't aggressive enough in some Midwestern states. Democrats should put together a detailed postmortem report, he said, similar to what Republicans did after Mitt Romney's loss in 2012.

“We owe it to our supporters to say what we think we did right, what we think we did wrong," Podesta said. "I think [in] Wisconsin we could have done better. There’s no question about it.”

“At the end of the day, we also lost Pennsylvania, and there is nothing we left … undone there, and we still lost by 44,000 votes," he added.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/podesta-trump-russian-hackers-232786

No matter how you frame it, as focusing here on Podesta for speaking his view, Russia interfered in the American election, and to say that it didn't have positive consequences for Trump would be denying that WikiLeaks had any effect at all in the election
 
Wiki was minimal.
It was a look at the campaign-not so much Clinton ( except thru the eyes of the campaign -which granted wasn't flattering).
Podesta is going way afield here with his baseless specs on Russian/Trump collusions
 
Wiki was minimal.
It was a look at the campaign-not so much Clinton ( except thru the eyes of the campaign -which granted wasn't flattering).
Podesta is going way afield here with his baseless specs on Russian/Trump collusions

"Wiki was minimal?" You kidding, half the demogogues on Fox and the radio used the released information as the center piece of their programming for four months

From the jump, the GOP, beginning with the bogus Congressional investigations, created the portrait of Clinton as dishonest and not trustworthy, and Wikileaks complemented the strategdy, it wasn't by accident that they came out on a daily basis.

Podesta may be stretching it, but to say that the Russian activity didn't influence the election and aided Trump is inane
 
"Wiki was minimal?" You kidding, half the demogogues on Fox and the radio used the released information as the center piece of their programming for four months

From the jump, the GOP, beginning with the bogus Congressional investigations, created the portrait of Clinton as dishonest and not trustworthy, and Wikileaks complemented the strategdy, it wasn't by accident that they came out on a daily basis.

Podesta may be stretching it, but to say that the Russian activity didn't influence the election and aided Trump is inane

Why do you think it was the Russians who did it?
 
Probably because Hillary and the MSM are continually repeating that they are.

Agreed, and that's the problem. They don't think. Knowing what you know, from what you've seen over the last year, who do you think are the most likely group to have leaked that info?

I'm saying FBI.
 
Agreed, and that's the problem. They don't think. Knowing what you know, from what you've seen over the last year, who do you think are the most likely group to have leaked that info?

I'm saying FBI.

I'm leaning towards someone within the DNC itself.
 
Back
Top