Trump sides with Putin over the CIA.

GazzaQueen said:
How well could you imagine a SoS who would be so foolish as to set up a private server to do government business? How easy is it for you to condone a political party rigging their own primaries to assure a certain outcome? How sad and bizarre do you find it that an entire political party could be so corrupt as to denigrate news networks to do their bidding?

Please let's hope some foreigner doesn't let us know what's going on.
Click to expand...
It's laughable, the RNC was probably just as awful, but we will never know being that the Russians only leaked the DNC emails.
 
I'd congratulate Trump & conservatives if they weren't out there rubbing the left's face in it every day and if they'd show even the tiniest bit of awareness that more people voted against them.

I haven't seen any effort to reach out to the other side, outside of sparse empty rhetoric. Hannity proclaimed to his viewers that they "took the country back" on election night. I lost my country, and all I can do is my small part to get it back. I'm really not going to pretend to support any of this.
 
Rana said:
It's laughable, the RNC was probably just as awful, but we will never know being that the Russians only leaked the DNC emails.
Click to expand...

Words like probably, maybe, coulda, shoulda, woulda, make your posts pure entertainment.

But hey, at least the leaks weren't lies, hmm? :D
 
Rana said:
It's laughable, the RNC was probably just as awful, but we will never know being that the Russians only leaked the DNC emails.
Click to expand...

What you do know for sure is that NOT EVEN ONE of the hacked emails were denied by the senders.....not one....they told the truth....
 
NOVA said:
What you do know for sure is that NOT EVEN ONE of the hacked emails were denied by the senders.....not one....they told the truth....
Click to expand...

That wasn't her point, bravs.

It's ridiculous how one-sided Wiki was.

But it doesn't matter now. Like everything, when the shoe is on the other foot - and it will be - I'm sure you'll be the first on here screaming foul.
 
Thing1 said:
That wasn't her point, bravs.

It's ridiculous how one-sided Wiki was.

But it doesn't matter now. Like everything, when the shoe is on the other foot - and it will be - I'm sure you'll be the first on here screaming foul.
Click to expand...

Sorry sonny, I just don't deal in 'probably' if I don't have to.....

Wikileaks said they did have emails from the RNC but saw no reason to post them because they that information was already in the public domain....
you can take that for whatever its worth.....
 
anatta said:
he doesn't have a functioning staff. Only transitional. If I were him I'd SHUT UP and do more -but Trump is Trump-
he's elected on this.
After Jan 20th I'll be criticizing him for legitimate screw ups like anyone else, but not beforehand -it's not fair to judge yet.
Click to expand...

LMFAO
:legion:
:evilnod:
 
NOVA said:
What you do know for sure is that NOT EVEN ONE of the hacked emails were denied by the senders.....not one....they told the truth....
Click to expand...

WRONG.

From POLITIFACT:

"I would be shocked if the emails weren't altered," said Jamie Winterton, director of strategy for Arizona State University’s Global Security Initiative, citing Russia’s long history of spreading disinformation.

Experts pointed to the Democratic National Committee email hack that happened earlier this year. Metadata from the stolen and leaked documents showed the hackers had edited documents. For example, hackers were kicked out of the DNC network June 11, yet among their documents is a file that was created on June 15, found Thomas Rid, a war studies professor at King’s College London.

A few weeks later, Guccifer 2.0, the hacker believed to have Russian ties, released documents supposedly stolen from the Clinton Foundation. But security analysts reviewed the documents and found that they actually came from the DNC hacks, not the foundation. And some of the information was likely fabricated, like a folder conspicuously titled "Pay to Play."

In massive document dumps like the Podesta email leak, the risk of encountering altered documents is heightened because it’s easy to slip them in among thousands of genuine documents, said Susan Hennessey, a Brookings Institution fellow and former lawyer for the National Security Agency.

"It is possible the WikiLeaks dump of Podesta’s emails includes forged or altered documents," Hennessey said. "With any large leak, it is wise to proceed with caution and skepticism and verify the authenticity of documents before reporting."
 
anatta said:
I was a florida Gore voter. I was pissed too. I thought Shrub to be a simpleton-it was obvious that was going to be a Cheney administration.
But when the hanging chads stopped flying he was duly elected- and he got my support as an American.

It didn't last long I was vehemently opposed to Iraq ( remember those yellow ribbons of blind patriotism?)-
but at least I had concrete reasons to despise him by then.
Do what you want. I'm saying give him a chance before you go after him
Click to expand...
And I am saying go fuck yourself.
 
anatta said:
Obama got the first 100 days - and yes I would have sucked it up and gave Hillary a chance ( and then probably gone after her).
It's what Americans do..at least before this crowd came along..

Podesta is blaming the Russians/Clinton is blaming the Russians/Comey/the electoral college -everyone but herself.
It's petty and not accurate. Clinton had no message except "Trump is bad". Get over it.
Click to expand...

How about no, because fuck you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top