Where are the stand your ground gun nuts?

sear said:
Thank you for sharing your feelings.

oh
"Delusions".
You mean like:


Perhaps I should share yet another "delusion".

For those not intelligent enough to put one and one together, this is the law Zimmerman violated when he night-stalked the school boy that was strolling back from the candy store before Zimmerman blocked, and then shot the unarmed boy dead.

Yup! The word used was "delusion".
44a259045d6bc18697b7bc4ddaaf002acfc7ea0.gif

I know.
Good stuff.
Click to expand...

Hey look we have a new term made up by the left. "NIGHT STALKED"

Let it go. Trayvon is dead and ain't coming back.
 
sear said:
Thank you for sharing your feelings.

oh
"Delusions".
You mean like:


Perhaps I should share yet another "delusion".

For those not intelligent enough to put one and one together, this is the law Zimmerman violated when he night-stalked the school boy that was strolling back from the candy store before Zimmerman blocked, and then shot the unarmed boy dead.

Yup! The word used was "delusion".
44a259045d6bc18697b7bc4ddaaf002acfc7ea0.gif

I know.
Good stuff.
Click to expand...

We can start with your delusion that you FEEL a comment by a Police dispatcher is required to be followed or that it's a lawful order.

READY

BEGIN IN

3

2

1

GO
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Now I have never hid my views that gun fetishist are people missing a few chromosomes who should be thrown screaming from a helicopter. Oh not because I don't believe in guns. I'm not against guns. Hell I'm not even against people shooting each other. It's the American way. I honestly don't care who gets shot. Parents, school teachers, kids, fuckem. Let them get shot. Doesn't bother me.

But the whining hypocrisy of gun fetishist does. They made a national hero out of a needle dick loser like Zimmerman for shooting a defenseless black kid. Hey the little fucker was wearing a hoody and was armed with skittles. He obviously deserved to be shot.

But where are the gun fetishist now during the Will Smith murder trial? Why aren't they making a hero out of Cardell Hayes. He's hiding behind "Stand your ground laws" like needle dick Zimmerman did. Hell Hayes shot an unarmed black man too....shouldn't that make him a hero like Zimmerman to the gun fetishist?

Why aren't Zimmerman worshipers like Grind not picking the peanuts out of his shit too? Where the fuck is Wayne LaPierre and why isn't he screaming bloody murder about this violation of Cardell Hayes gun rights? Could it be because Cardell Hayes is black too?

Oh no it couldn't possibly be that! :rolleyes:

Shit like this is why gun fetishist give me the creeps. They're like the dirty old man in a trench coat standing outside a Convent. They just give me the willies.

oh...in case some of you NRA Gun fetishist want to get a woody...here's a link for you.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...-murder-trial-rests-case-fourth-day-testimony
Click to expand...

The point you're missing is that pro...con...whatever you are, you don't make noise without the media so your question should be where is the media?
 
"We can start with your delusion that you FEEL a comment by a Police dispatcher is required to be followed or that it's a lawful order." U9
Click to expand...
I've never made any such assertion.

Instead I acknowledged Z replied in the affirmative, AS IF complying, but continued to night-stalk Martin. I've never asserted in so doing Z violated a lawful order. Therefore sir, that "delusion" is yours, not mine.
 
BTW, this whole thread premise is retarded. What Zimmerman did had nothing to do with SYG, his own legal team didn't even try to use that defense and that little bitch should be in jail right now.
 
sear said:
I've never made any such assertion.

Instead I acknowledged Z replied in the affirmative, AS IF complying, but continued to night-stalk Martin. I've never asserted in so doing Z violated a lawful order. Therefore sir, that "delusion" is yours, not mine.
Click to expand...

Are you so mentally challenged; that you can't properly utilize the quote feature, in such a way that the person you're replying to shows in the quote?? :dunno:

If you weren't trying to suggest that Zimmerman failed to follow the Dispatcher's "order", then why are you referring to it and supplying a link to it.

When being hung by your own petard, it's best to not step off of the chair voluntarily. :D
 
Guille said:
BTW, this whole thread premise is retarded. What Zimmerman did had nothing to do with SYG, his own legal team didn't even try to use that defense and that little bitch should be in jail right now.
Click to expand...

But it is amusing to watch a liberal trying to prove the unprovable and to continue whining, just because things didn't go the way they FELT it should. :D
 
G #86

Sensible point. I agree, it's a topic / subject line mismatch.
"You posted your "feelings"; when you chose to try and luse proven lies, as facts." U9 #78
Click to expand...
I invite you to quote any factual error you perceive me to have posted, and correct it. Go ahead! Shame me before the world!
"We can start with your delusion that you FEEL a comment by a Police dispatcher is required to be followed or that it's a lawful order." U9
Click to expand...
That's what I mean.
Your assertion here is 100% false. I never stated or implied what you accuse me of here.

Candidly, so is all the rest of your blather. Go ahead. Prove me wrong. Quote me. Prove it's false.

Good luck with that. So far, you're batting ZERO%.
 
sear said:
G #86

Sensible point. I agree, it's a topic / subject line mismatch.

I invite you to quote any factual error you perceive me to have posted, and correct it. Go ahead! Shame me before the world!

That's what I mean.
Your assertion here is 100% false. I never stated or implied what you accuse me of here.

Candidly, so is all the rest of your blather. Go ahead. Prove me wrong. Quote me. Prove it's false.

Good luck with that. So far, you're batting ZERO%.
Click to expand...

#57
 
sear said:
ok
So you think you can struggle like a champion to ridicule what has not been refuted here; observe it is how the jury ruled; and thereby ...? What? Prove something?

You have proved nothing. Your #69 barely rises to the level of contradiction, and a rude one at that.

Now that you've established stating the obvious as an acceptable standard for this thread, I'll state what should be obvious but seems not to be understood by you:

Know it or not, believe it or not, like it or not, admit it or not; juries are not infallible.

So either you're so ill-informed you didn't know that. Or you're so corrupt that you knew; but pretended the contrary.

I'm aware of the ruling in this case. Are YOU aware of how badly prosecuted it was? By law the State is obliged to meet its burden. In reality that doesn't make Trayvon Martin guilty. And it doesn't make Zimmerman innocent. Instead, Trayvon Martin is dead, and Zimmerman was found "not guilty". Perhaps that distinction is lost on you.

In any case, while Trayvon Martin was no choir boy either; to my knowledge his record was not as bad as Zimmerman's is. Zimmerman has quite a rap sheet. It makes "interesting" reading. And it will supply the informed reader with practical insight into Zimmerman's behavior profile.
Click to expand...


the preponderance of the evidence heavily suggests zimmerman was in the right. The states own witnesses basically helped zimmerman. I have never seen a trial before where the defense had all the facts and put on a complete clinic. It was the state always arguing "supposed's and what-ifs".. never had a single concrete piece of evidence.

Trayvon was a violent assaulter and he got what he deserved.
 
liberals have been getting their ass kicked in the culture wars the last 4 years. That's the thing. Zimmerman, failed. Wilson, failed. Trump, failed. Brexit, failed. When was the last time liberals had an honest win on anything?
 
Mr. Meeseeks said:
the preponderance of the evidence heavily suggests zimmerman was in the right. The states own witnesses basically helped zimmerman. I have never seen a trial before where the defense had all the facts and put on a complete clinic. It was the state always arguing "supposed's and what-ifs".. never had a single concrete piece of evidence.

Trayvon was a violent assaulter and he got what he deserved.
Click to expand...

I'm torn on this too. I personally think Zimmerman should be in jail but there's no doubt his legal team put on a clinic but...the state didn't really try. The first thing that happened was the prosecution deferred to an affirmative action case social justice warrior. I wonder what would have happened had the state actually chosen to use a competent prosecutor for that case.
 
Mr. Meeseeks said:
liberals have been getting their ass kicked in the culture wars the last 4 years. That's the thing. Zimmerman, failed. Wilson, failed. Trump, failed. Brexit, failed. When was the last time liberals had an honest win on anything?
Click to expand...

In about 9 weeks; it will be the 5th anniversary of Zimmerman successfully defending his life. :good4u:
 
"the preponderance of the evidence heavily suggests zimmerman was in the right." MM
Click to expand...
You're not the first to make that claim.
I suspect a more precise phrasing would be:

the preponderance of the evidence PRESENTED AT TRIAL heavily suggests zimmerman was in the right, PERHAPS.

I wouldn't know.
I did not attend the trial.
I televiewed only a few seconds of it.
"The states own witnesses basically helped zimmerman."
Click to expand...
If you say so.

But deliberately or not, you're changing the topic I'm addressing.

YOU are addressing the trial.

I am addressing the facts of the case.

3f7355494f78670a1bb59d2c7acc1ba80982c23.jpg


This image for example, is cited by those that worship Zimm as a hero as "proof" that Martin was a thug, and viciously attacked Z.
But those that have ever investigated a crime scene understand if it was Z that forced the confrontation leading Martin to believe he was being night-stalked by a gun-toting trouble-maker (which happens to be PRECISELY the case), Martin might have felt his life way in danger, and SYG.

It's unwise to allow "evidence" such as this to merely be fodder for confirmation bias.
"Those who consider the Devil to be a partisan of Evil and angels to be warriors for Good accept the demagogy of the angels. Things are clearly more complicated." Milan Kundera
Click to expand...
Amen.
"I have never seen a trial before where the defense had all the facts and put on a complete clinic. It was the state always arguing "supposed's and what-ifs".. never had a single concrete piece of evidence."
Click to expand...
Thanks for that.
That is what I have assumed. The prosecution WOULD HAVE TO HAVE BEEN botched to the gills for Z to walk on this one. The Sanford Police Dispatch recording alone should have locked Z up for decades, if not dangled him from a string.
"Trayvon was a violent assaulter and he got what he deserved."
Click to expand...
Or precisely as it appears, a school boy walking from the candy store to his father, that was groundlessly* suspected (corroborated by 911)
when a suspicious, ill-trained gun-toting, night-stalking rule-breaker tracked the boy down and killed him. I'm less than impressed with your "blame the victim" approach here. By Z's own accounting Trayvon turned and ran, obviously in an effort to AVOID a confrontation, not start one.

* Z even confesses this to police: "I don't know what his deal is." Z

http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/326700-full-transcript-zimmerman.html
 
sear said:
You're not the first to make that claim.
I suspect a more precise phrasing would be:

the preponderance of the evidence PRESENTED AT TRIAL heavily suggests zimmerman was in the right, PERHAPS.

I wouldn't know.
I did not attend the trial.
I televiewed only a few seconds of it.

If you say so.

But deliberately or not, you're changing the topic I'm addressing.

YOU are addressing the trial.

I am addressing the facts of the case.

3f7355494f78670a1bb59d2c7acc1ba80982c23.jpg


This image for example, is cited by those that worship Zimm as a hero as "proof" that Martin was a thug, and viciously attacked Z.
But those that have ever investigated a crime scene understand if it was Z that forced the confrontation leading Martin to believe he was being night-stalked by a gun-toting trouble-maker (which happens to be PRECISELY the case), Martin might have felt his life way in danger, and SYG.

It's unwise to allow "evidence" such as this to merely be fodder for confirmation bias.

Amen.

Thanks for that.
That is what I have assumed. The prosecution WOULD HAVE TO HAVE BEEN botched to the gills for Z to walk on this one. The Sanford Police Dispatch recording alone should have locked Z up for decades, if not dangled him from a string.

Or precisely as it appears, a school boy walking from the candy store to his father, that was groundlessly* suspected (corroborated by 911)
when a suspicious, ill-trained gun-toting, night-stalking rule-breaker tracked the boy down and killed him. I'm less than impressed with your "blame the victim" approach here. By Z's own accounting Trayvon turned and ran, obviously in an effort to AVOID a confrontation, not start one.

* Z even confesses this to police: "I don't know what his deal is." Z

http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/326700-full-transcript-zimmerman.html
Click to expand...

Obviously you're comfortable with your delusions and lies; so rather then continue to try and show you the error of your ways, I'll just let you continue and will remind you in about 9 weeks that Trayvon is still dead and Zimmerman is still NOT GUILTY.

:evilnod:
 
"I'll just let you continue and will remind you in about 9 weeks" U9
Click to expand...
You flatter me U9. I'm not likely to remember you exist in 9 hours.
So obviously I'm vastly more important to you than you are to me. But your offer of the reminder is unnecessary. I'll retain that information for the indefinite future.
 
sear said:
You flatter me U9. I'm not likely to remember you exist in 9 hours.
So obviously I'm vastly more important to you than you are to me. But your offer of the reminder is unnecessary. I'll retain that information for the indefinite future.
Click to expand...

I see you're still unable to comprehend or use, a simple feature like the quote feature.

So Sad
Too Bad

:facepalm:
 
There are hundreds of black on black and black on white crimes every day. The media only reports on the white on black crimes that happen once every 10 years or so.

The whole Zimmerman and Trayvon thing wasn't even a white on black crime, it was a black on beaner crime. Trayvon was trying to mug a man with a gun... not very bright if you ask me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top