Where are the stand your ground gun nuts?

Mott the Hoople

Mott the Hoople

Sweet Jane
Now I have never hid my views that gun fetishist are people missing a few chromosomes who should be thrown screaming from a helicopter. Oh not because I don't believe in guns. I'm not against guns. Hell I'm not even against people shooting each other. It's the American way. I honestly don't care who gets shot. Parents, school teachers, kids, fuckem. Let them get shot. Doesn't bother me.

But the whining hypocrisy of gun fetishist does. They made a national hero out of a needle dick loser like Zimmerman for shooting a defenseless black kid. Hey the little fucker was wearing a hoody and was armed with skittles. He obviously deserved to be shot.

But where are the gun fetishist now during the Will Smith murder trial? Why aren't they making a hero out of Cardell Hayes. He's hiding behind "Stand your ground laws" like needle dick Zimmerman did. Hell Hayes shot an unarmed black man too....shouldn't that make him a hero like Zimmerman to the gun fetishist?

Why aren't Zimmerman worshipers like Grind not picking the peanuts out of his shit too? Where the fuck is Wayne LaPierre and why isn't he screaming bloody murder about this violation of Cardell Hayes gun rights? Could it be because Cardell Hayes is black too?

Oh no it couldn't possibly be that! :rolleyes:

Shit like this is why gun fetishist give me the creeps. They're like the dirty old man in a trench coat standing outside a Convent. They just give me the willies.

oh...in case some of you NRA Gun fetishist want to get a woody...here's a link for you.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...-murder-trial-rests-case-fourth-day-testimony
 
Last edited:
Well Mott, if Trayvon Martin wasn't black, Zimmerman [who is a first degree idiot] would be lost in obscurity. But the media knows white dudes shooting unarmed black kids sells, so we can thank them Zimmerman's fame.

Shootings happen every day.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
Well Mott, if Trayvon Martin wasn't black, Zimmerman [who is a first degree idiot] would be lost in obscurity. But the media knows white dudes shooting unarmed black kids sells, so we can thank them Zimmerman's fame.

Shootings happen every day.
Click to expand...
Well fine but that doesn't answer my question of where are all the gun fetishist who were picking peanuts out of Zimmermans shit? Why aren't they beating the drums for Hayes too? They're not exactly "the media".
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Well fine but that doesn't answer my question of where are all the gun fetishist who were picking peanuts out of Zimmermans shit? Why aren't they beating the drums for Hayes too? They're not exactly "the media".
Click to expand...

For whatever reasons, the media didn't pick up on the OP shootings. I wasn't even aware of them.
 
christiefan915 said:
The reason that white people don't have a dog in this fight so it doesn't matter to them.
Click to expand...

I'm not even sure what that means.

Unless it's a mass shooting, shootings are typically local stories. Martin/Zimmerman became an exception because it fit the open season on unarmed black kids narrative. If both of them were the same color it would have remained a local story.

And the country as a whole would have been better off for it.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
I'm not even sure what that means.

Unless it's a mass shooting, shootings are typically local stories. Martin/Zimmerman became an exception because it fit the open season on unarmed black kids narrative. If both of them were the same color it would have remained a local story.

And the country as a whole would have been better off for it.
Click to expand...

It means that black on black crime doesn't rate media attention like black on white crime, or white on black crime.
 
Alright.
"they made a national hero out of a needle dick loser like Zimmerman for shooting a defenseless black kid." #1
Click to expand...
If that's your thesis I'm w/ 1,000%.

I'm not sure if I qualify as a gun nut or not.
I'm former U.S. military.
I'm a former policeman.
I have a hunting rifle.
I'm an NRA life member (for political reasons *).

But Zimmerman was either a gargantuan buffoon, or a ruthless night-stalker that shot dead an innocent school boy strolling home from the candy store.

They're not mutually exclusive. I can despise Zimmerman and extend sincere sympathies to Trayvon's bereaved; and still support the principle that our Constitutional rights are worth defending BUT NOT ABUSING!!

* I joined when President GHWB quit, BECAUSE he quit.

The appropriate treatment for Zimmerman is 30 days in the electric chair.
 
christiefan915 said:
The reason that white people don't have a dog in this fight so it doesn't matter to them.
Click to expand...

A Latino kills an African American, why would white people care less or more than anyone else.....

the shooter was arrested, a jury spoke, and justice was done....case closed.

Why do liberals hate our laws, our country, our election system and everything else about the United States....??
 
NOVA said:
Really ?...and here I thought if was because someone got shot.....my bad.
Click to expand...

Stop being so braindead.

The discussion prior to my post was specifically about shooting victims, and why some get publicity & some don't.

I'm really tired of your relentless stupidity.
 
NOVA said:
A Latino kills an African American, why would white people care less or more than anyone else.....

the shooter was arrested, a jury spoke, and justice was done....case closed.

Why do liberals hate our laws, our country, our election system and everything else about the United States....??
Click to expand...

Oh, cool - so you don't think Hillary did anything wrong w/ the emails, because the FBI said she wasn't guilty of anything.

Glad you finally came around, dummy.
 
Thing1 said:
Oh, cool - so you don't think Hillary did anything wrong w/ the emails, because the FBI said she wasn't guilty of anything.

Glad you finally came around, dummy.
Click to expand...


Really?....was she arrested?...Did a jury speak ?... no.....so justice never entered the picture....

and the FBI DID NOT say she wasn't guilty of anything......as a matter of FACT, according to Comey's sworn testimony he

did say she was guilty of lying, sending and receiving classified emails, and some other things as you well know.

I'm really tired of your relentless stupidity, dummy.
 
"Oh, cool - so you don't think Hillary did anything wrong w/ the emails, because the FBI said she wasn't guilty of anything.

Glad you finally came around, dummy."
Click to expand...
Hillary was wrong to have used a private server for State Department communiqués.

What the AG said was the offense didn't seem to be prosecutable. That doesn't make it not wrong. Whether that alone is what cost her the election, we may never know.
 
sear said:
Hillary was wrong to have used a private server for State Department communiqués.

What the AG said was the offense didn't seem to be prosecutable. That doesn't make it not wrong. Whether that alone is what cost her the election, we may never know.
Click to expand...

It wasn't a "lock her up" offense.

If it was a dude not named Clinton, it's a 2 week story.
 
sear said:
Hillary was wrong to have used a private server for State Department communiqués.

What the AG said was the offense didn't seem to be prosecutable. That doesn't make it not wrong. Whether that alone is what cost her the election, we may never know.
Click to expand...
the AG never said any such thing.
It was the FBI ( Comey) who failed to find "intent" - even though the gross negligence statute does not require intent.
He called it "extreme carelessness" which is the same as gross negligence,
and that statute was written particulary as a check on negligence (doing harm to national security) without actual intent of a crime
 
#19

Who announced it wouldn't be prosecuted?

Whoever made the public announcement, you think the AG was out of the loop?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top