If ypu believe that you won an election easily "in a landslide,"

A

archives

Verified User
why would you also go out of your way and spend the money to fight against and block a recount in three states?
 
if you knew that the voting machines in those three states weren't connected to the internet why did you ask for a recount based on allegations of hacking?.....
 
archives said:
why would you also go out of your way and spend the money to fight against and block a recount in three states?
Click to expand...
I think you crybabies should do a recount. In fact, I think you should do a recount every week. I mean, it's not like you losers had anything better to do. ;)
 
Celticguy said:
And since the state does know, why don't they just say no to that request ?
Click to expand...

PA has.....the MI courts are scheduled to decide today.....the elections board voted 2-2 on party lines, two separate court cases, one from Trump's camp another from the AG, seek to block it.....
 
Granule said:
I think you crybabies should do a recount. In fact, I think you should do a recount every week. I mean, it's not like you losers had anything better to do. ;)
Click to expand...

except they say the recount will cost Michigan taxpayers ten million.....our laws don't require Stein to pay it all.......
 
but millions of non Americans voted and you don't want to stop it?





your lies will tear your insides out


you will die an evil guilt ridden death alone
 
What's in it for Stein ?....why is she demanding a recount in these for states ?....lets hear the excuses you come up with....
 
archives said:
why would you also go out of your way and spend the money to fight against and block a recount in three states?
Click to expand...

Two questions; who said won an election "easily?" Two; who is spending money other than the idiots wanting spurious recounts?
 
NOVA said:
What's in it for Stein ?....why is she demanding a recount in these for states ?....lets hear the excuses you come up with....
Click to expand...

She is a tool for the DNC; anyone thinking this has not been a tactic from the Clinton campaign is naïve and stupid.
 
Stein has nothing to gain, nothing at all. Its all about depriving Trump the Presidency...


The REAL REASON for the recounts is delay.

If a state does not finish a recount by Dec. 13, their electoral votes don't count

By itself, the inability of Wisconsin's electors to vote wouldn't change the outcome of the election, since Trump would still have 296 electors.

The interesting question is: What happens if all three of the contested states (WI, MI, and PA) can't finish the recount in time,

since this would bring Trump's total down to 260.

 
Last edited:
As far as I am aware, the law says the winner of the electoral college is the
person that gets more than 50% of the votes....no set number is written in
the law because the total electors sometimes changes....so the 270 number isn't set in stone.....unless every states
electors get to vote....

so is Stein's quest just a waste of money from the start ?

The only way the House could elect the next president is if 37 of Trumps electors vote for someone else, or vote a
blank ballot.....
 
Last edited:
NOVA said:
If a state does not finish a recount by Dec. 13, their electoral votes don't count
Click to expand...
probably not true.....in all three states the votes have already been certified.....that means the electors already have their instructions on who to vote for......
 
NOVA said:
What's in it for Stein ?....why is she demanding a recount in these for states ?....lets hear the excuses you come up with....
Click to expand...

She's raising money, and keeping her name in the limelight, why does it matter, again, if you won in landslide why would a recount bother you?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
if you knew that the voting machines in those three states weren't connected to the internet why did you ask for a recount based on allegations of hacking?.....[/QUOTE

Asking a question in response to a question isn't addressing the topic, again, if your bragging you won in a landslide, why be bothered by a recount?
Click to expand...
 
Granule said:
I think you crybabies should do a recount. In fact, I think you should do a recount every week. I mean, it's not like you losers had anything better to do. ;)
Click to expand...

Crybabies, you kidding, if the first month alone has taught us the next four years is going to be endless entertainment, lets just hope the Nation doesn't suffer in the meantime
 
archives said:
Asking a question in response to a question isn't addressing the topic, again, if your bragging you won in a landslide, why be bothered by a recount?
Click to expand...
????......it wasn't intended to address the topic......it was intended to highlite how incredibly stupid your post was......
 
Truth Detector said:
She is a tool for the DNC; anyone thinking this has not been a tactic from the Clinton campaign is naïve and stupid.
Click to expand...

Or those that think it is are paranoid and live in a world of conspiracies and endless existential threats, unfortunate for them, life isn't a melodrama
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top