Daily Reminder for JPP Liberals:

danielpalos said:
I don't.
Click to expand...
so how do you explain the fact you posted "could end the need for the abortion of a fellow human being"......I want to know what the fuck you think is the need to kill children.......you posted it dumbfuck, don't run from it......tell us why you need to kill?.........
 
PostmodernProphet said:
not significant numbers of actual abortions......get back to me when you want to talk about real issues....
Click to expand...
Holy fuck, it's like nailing a jelly to a wall!! Let me make it easy for you then! Given those circumstances would you have a problem with abortion. A simple yes or no answer will suffice.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
PostmodernProphet said:
so how do you explain the fact you posted "could end the need for the abortion of a fellow human being"......I want to know what the fuck you think is the need to kill children.......you posted it dumbfuck, don't run from it......tell us why you need to kill?.........
Click to expand...

abortion happens. only the right wing is fantastical enough to think it doesn't.

an ounce of prevention is more ethical.
 
Milagro said:
Holy fuck, it's like nailing a jelly to a wall!! Let me make it easy for you then! Given those circumstances would you have a problem with abortion. A simple yes or no answer will suffice.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

First of all, abortion has always been legal, long prior to Roe v Wade to save the life of the mother.....a couple of pages ago I even said that I had no objection when you said England only permitted abortion for that reason.......second, I have consistently said in the seven years I have been posting here that I am willing to permit abortion in the less than 1% of cases that involve rape or incest if liberals will forgo killing children in the other 99% of cases........if you still aren't aware of it I will repeat it.....I am willing to permit abortion in the less than 1% of cases that involve rape or incest if liberals will forgo killing children in the other 99% of cases......now do you have any more ignorant questions?.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
First of all, abortion has always been legal, long prior to Roe v Wade to save the life of the mother.....a couple of pages ago I even said that I had no objection when you said England only permitted abortion for that reason.......second, I have consistently said in the seven years I have been posting here that I am willing to permit abortion in the less than 1% of cases that involve rape or incest if liberals will forgo killing children in the other 99% of cases........if you still aren't aware of it I will repeat it.....I am willing to permit abortion in the less than 1% of cases that involve rape or incest if liberals will forgo killing children in the other 99% of cases......now do you have any more ignorant questions?.....
Click to expand...

where do you get you, "moral authority" from? are you a Pope.
 
danielpalos said:
abortion happens. only the right wing is fantastical enough to think it doesn't.

an ounce of prevention is more ethical.
Click to expand...
abortion doesn't happen......abortion is done........you said it needed to be done......I asked you why it needed to be done and you are afraid to answer the question.......why are you afraid to answer the question?.......an ounce of prevention is ethical......not killing children is ethical......abortion is never ethical......why do you need to kill children daniel?......
 
danielpalos said:
where do you get you, "moral authority" from? are you a Pope.
Click to expand...

you try to tell me its okay to kill children and you ask me about moral authority?.....I'm not a pope......I'm a human being......so is the child you want to kill......what are you?......why do you need to kill children, daniel....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
bully for you.....everything is more ethical than killing children......now, back to what you said about needing to kill them.......why, Daniel......why do you need to kill children?.....
Click to expand...

i meant, Any need.

it could be eliminated through prevention, instead of the cognitive dissonance of the right,

about complaining about Both,

the cost of an ounce of prevention And the cost of a pound of cure;

while at the same time, whining about taxes needed for social services.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
First of all, abortion has always been legal, long prior to Roe v Wade to save the life of the mother.....a couple of pages ago I even said that I had no objection when you said England only permitted abortion for that reason.......second, I have consistently said in the seven years I have been posting here that I am willing to permit abortion in the less than 1% of cases that involve rape or incest if liberals will forgo killing children in the other 99% of cases........if you still aren't aware of it I will repeat it.....I am willing to permit abortion in the less than 1% of cases that involve rape or incest if liberals will forgo killing children in the other 99% of cases......now do you have any more ignorant questions?.....
Click to expand...
For a lawyer you can be extraordinarily dense. These are the circumstances where abortion is legal in Great Britain (which excludes Northern Ireland).

https://www.mariestopes.org.uk/women/abortion/abortion-facts/what-uk-law-abortion

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top