GM announces layoffs 2000 jobs in OH and MI one day AFTER the election

Would US Firms still be outsourcing, if they were excised the wage difference between our First World, and any Third World?

my ideal situation would be high tariffs on firms that outsource and state level minimum wage so that companies in the coast with higher minimum wages would outsource inland. Historically coastal areas (like the nile cities in egypt, carthage, rome, london) are always wealthier than landlocked ones. We have to force the wealth to flow inward.
 
check it ten trillion times......isn't it amazing that you didn't notice when Obama' deficit spending exceeded that of every Republican administration since you were born combined, plus the deficit spending of every other Democrat administration since you were born, combined plus the deficit spending of every Republican and Democrat administration BEFORE you were born, combined plus another two trillion on top of that?........

Did anyone else note that stupid Marketwatch posted by BAC was from October, before the election?
 
Obviously not if you're a Republican and you sit by doing nothing while the market crashes.

This post is too stupid for prime time.
bsmeter.gif
 
Althea, why no response here? We should never deficit spend? Does any other Keynesian supporting democrat believe that?

this is why, no one takes the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

That is like telling banks and Firms, don't make money, with other people’s money.

Only the right wing, never gets it.
 
Deficit spending for tax cuts is different than deficit spending for infrastructure 'Wacko.

^Another leftist idiot who thinks what citizens earn belongs to the Government and that we should be happy for that which the Government allows us to keep.

Here is a history lesson for you Liberal dullards who keep prattling this asinine talking point: Tax cuts do not result in LOWER revenue to the Government, AND, we do not have a REVENUE problem in this country, but rather, a SPENDING problem.

One last thing; the massive $850 billion pork laden stimulus bill did NOTHING to improve anyone's lives or create good paying jobs. What it did do is bury and straddle the American taxpayer with another trillion in debt. You know, the thing your SS IOUs help to fund.

You really are one dumb motherfucker. :rofl2:
 
this is why, no one takes the right wing seriously about economics or the law.

That is like telling banks and Firms, don't make money, with other people’s money.

Only the right wing, never gets it.

Irony from an economics retard on steroids. You wouldn't comprehend economics if it slapped you on your empty leftist head shit-for-brains.
 
^Another leftist idiot who thinks what citizens earn belongs to the Government and that we should be happy for that which the Government allows us to keep.

Here is a history lesson for you Liberal dullards who keep prattling this asinine talking point: Tax cuts do not result in LOWER revenue to the Government, AND, we do not have a REVENUE problem in this country, but rather, a SPENDING problem.

One last thing; the massive $850 billion pork laden stimulus bill did NOTHING to improve anyone's lives or create good paying jobs. What it did do is bury and straddle the American taxpayer with another trillion in debt. You know, the thing your SS IOUs help to fund.

You really are one dumb motherfucker. :rofl2:

History and facts disagree with you loser
 
Deficit spending for tax cuts is different than deficit spending for infrastructure 'Wacko.

Ah, I see. So when he said we should never deficit spend he really meant deficit spending for tax cuts is different than deficit spending for infrastructure. Is there a cheat sheet anywhere with other meanings like that I can learn?
 
Althea, why no response here? We should never deficit spend? Does any other Keynesian supporting democrat believe that?
I didn't see this post. Was it from you? I have quite a few idiots on ignore.

If you're asking me about deficit spending, we've been doing it throughout history. In fact, every business does it. The issue is that Republicans are the ones who criticize it, only to double down when they get into office. They cut taxes, and increase spending. Then...throughout history, a Democrat cleans up the mess while Republicans point fingers.
 
the stock market is not a good way to measure things though.
It's not a good way to measure the real economy....for sure.

The market numbers were offered in this thread as some proof that Trump will be good for the economy. Anything that came after that was just addressing the silly claim.
 
It's not a good way to measure the real economy....for sure.

The market numbers were offered in this thread as some proof that Trump will be good for the economy. Anything that came after that was just addressing the silly claim.

Wrong again; but then, being a leftist retard, being wrong is a state of mind with you morons.
 
Other than the Fed, if you believe they are to blame, how could a politician done anything once the market started tanking?
Obama did. He started with the Stimulus, that Republicans refused to fund as they clamored to beg for same in individual states.

Then, he put controls into place (many that were blocked to this day)to keep another banking disaster from happening.
 
Back
Top