BREAKING - Trump spox says NO CHARGES against Hhillary !!!

Oh, so then Trump flat out lied when he said he was going to lock her up, nice to see a conservative accept the facts for once
 
tsuke said:
TBH people like you are triggering me right now. Stop being so shortsighted. Hillary is small fry. We are trying to keep power for gneerations here. IF trump is successful the rustbelt will not go blue again for 50 years which means we can run candidates after trump and the dems have to flip something like texas to wrest power away from us.

We need the senate dems tame and compliant and they wont do that if we go after hillary. It was useful during the campaign for the narrative but not realistic now.
Click to expand...

IOW...it was just another in the loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong list of Trump LIES that gullible Trumpkins swallowed whole.
 
evince said:
How Russia Hacked USA Election – NSA Director
2 days ago by Johnson Abayomi



Admiral Michael Rogers, commander of US Cyber Command, director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and chief of the Central Security Service, has made a shocking revelation at the role played by Russia in the recently held American elections.
Rogers spoke candidly about how cyber-attacks and foreign interference affected the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.
“There shouldn’t be any doubts in anybody’s mind: This was not something that was done casually, this was not something that was done by chance, this was not a target that was selected purely arbitrarily,” Rogers said at a Wall Street Journal election forum. “This was a conscious effort by a nation state to attempt to achieve a specific effect.”
Rogers was directly indicting Russia, following the accusation of U.S. officials that the Kremlin were behind the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s internal email server in July and the breaching of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s personal Gmail account.

The argument was laid out in a post on Medium this week, which provides some evidence that may raise eyebrows of Clinton supporters.
“Why were our internal and public polls so unprecedentedly off the mark? Think-pieces have struggled to answer with ideas like “voting patterns have changed” or Conway’s “shadow supporters” purposefully misleading pollsters. But maybe the explanation is both crazier and much simpler. Maybe Russia, continuing their well-established patterns of tipping elections and quietly toppling governments, in line with their clear preference for Trump, took advantage of electronic voting and simply hacked a few key vulnerable counties in Wisconsin, PA, and FL to take out a historically anti-Russian Clinton in favor of Trump.”
The machines most susceptible to hacking are the direct-recording electronic voting machines — electronic touch-screen machines with no verifiable paper trail.
Additionally, as the Medium post notes, “In paper ballot counties Obama won in 2012, the ballot county losses are 1–2 percent. However in counties Obama won in 2012 that are purely digital, she lost by 10–15 percent.”
In addition, Russian hackers reportedly targeted state election systems in Arizona and Illinois. Coincidentally or not, the Russian deputy foreign minister said after the election that Russian government officials had conferred with members of Trump’s campaign squad.
The top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee called for an investigation into Russia’s meddling in the US election, in a letter sent to the Republican in charge of the committee
House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi supported the idea as well, saying the hacking should be investigated.
Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings sent a letter to chairman Jason Chaffetz calling for a “bipartisan” look at Russia’s involvement in the election.
Chaffetz was “open” to the idea in a private meeting the two had, Cummings wrote, but wanted “evidence.” Cummings wrote the letter as follow-up to publicly show Chaffetz such evidence.
Chaffetz did not immediately respond to the letter.
The Democrat congressman said that though the hacks were on Democratic groups, the outrage at Russia’s actions should be bipartisan.
“Elections are the bedrock of our nation’s democracy,” Cummings wrote. “Any attempt by a foreign power to undermine them is a direct attack on our core democratic values, and it should chill every member of Congress and American — red or blue — to the core.”

Read more at http://www.herald.ng/russia-hacked-u...6g3fQjajH1S.99
Click to expand...

Obama just met with Putin, why didn't he say anything to him about it?
 
Oh my. I am so sad now.


Personally, as I said before, Hillary is receiving all the punishment she deserves. Would I love to see the lying, duplicitous cunt in orange? Sure. But, in the end it makes no difference. Knowing that she will die never having achieving that what she most dearly wanted is all I need.

Is there anyone who wanted this more than Hillary? Is there anyone who felt they were more deserving than Hillary? Is there anyone who is more crushed by their loss than Hillary?

The answer to all three is a resounding no.
 
The Only Sarge said:
You obviously do not know how the branches of government work friend. The President doesnt pursue criminal charges against anybody. DoJ and Congress do that.
Now I know we are wrapping up 8 years of an unconstitutional "king" with his pen and phone. Trump is proving he is returning our leadership being guided by and under the Constitution. Class move.
Click to expand...

????.....you realize that the DoJ is part of the executive branch, right?.....
 
tsuke said:
we want to crush our enemies :) the jailing part is irrelevant
Click to expand...
we want to lead the country to prosperity,restore the rule of law (no more excessive executive orders) de-politicize the DoJ - control the borders.

Normal SANE THINGS -Americans as a people- can get behind
 
tsuke said:
TBH people like you are triggering me right now. Stop being so shortsighted. Hillary is small fry. We are trying to keep power for gneerations here. IF trump is successful the rustbelt will not go blue again for 50 years which means we can run candidates after trump and the dems have to flip something like texas to wrest power away from us.

We need the senate dems tame and compliant and they wont do that if we go after hillary. It was useful during the campaign for the narrative but not realistic now.
Click to expand...

I agree that it's insignificant in the big pic.

The main thing I care about is getting jobs back and the economy fired up. After that it's getting our foreign policy straightened out.

I honestly don't care what happens to Hillary. The important thing is she's gone lol. I also agree it's good politics on Trumps part: going after Hillary could come at the expense of his agenda.

If that's the case, screw it. Let her go to hawking pant suits on QVC. Who cares.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
I agree that it's insignificant in the big pic.

The main thing I care about is getting jobs back and the economy fired up. After that it's getting our foreign policy straightened out.

I honestly don't care what happens to Hillary. The important thing is she's gone lol. I also agree it's good politics on Trumps part: going after Hillary could come at the expense of his agenda.

If that's the case, screw it. Let her go to hawking pant suits on QVC. Who cares.
Click to expand...

https://www.conservativeoutfitters.com/blogs/news/hillary-clinton-selling-the-everyday-pantsuit-tee-on-her-website
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top