Deplorable don's questionable ‘blind trust’ setup just got more questionable

christiefan915

Catalyst
Contributor
Donald Trump's decision to leave his children in control of his fortune during his presidency was already an unusual and eyebrow-raising setup. And on Friday, it became even more so. A day after Trump's lawyer, Michael Cohen, announced that Trump's three oldest children -- Donald Jr., Ivanka and Eric -- would control what he labeled a "blind trust" for the president-elect, the Trump campaign announced Friday afternoon that all three would also serve on Trump's presidential transition team executive committee. In that role, the trio will have input when it comes to the people Trump picks for key administration posts.

Watchdogs who were critical of Trump's "blind trust" in the first place say this proves that the lines between President Trump and his money will be too fuzzy under this setup.

"The fact that they have been included as part of the transition team just shows how inappropriate their role in bridging the gap between him as a businessman and politician is," said Meredith McGehee, a strategic adviser at the Campaign Legal Center. "It’s a clear demonstration that there is no firewall between the two."

McGehee and others have also cast doubt on the idea that the so-called "blind trust" is actually blind at all. She calls it a "one-eye-closed-and-one-eye-open trust."

In addition to blurring the line between Trump's presidency and his money, skeptics note that his children will now also have control over the people who will be put in charge of regulatory decisions that could affect his multi-billion-dollar fortune. Kenneth Gross, a political law expert at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom, said it would be okay for Trump to involve his kids in the transition, but their dual roles are problematic.

"If the children run the so-called blind trust and also serve in some governmental capacity, formally or informally, this would further exacerbate potential conflicts and ethical issues caused by not separating his business holdings from his governmental functions," Gross said.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...blind-trust-setup-just-got-more-questionable/
 
Last edited:
small potatos, unless one thinks there is a "pay to play" thing going on,like with the Clinton Foundation.
It's transitional staffing, not policy decisions
 
small potatos, unless one thinks there is a "pay to play" thing going on,like with the Clinton Foundation.
It's transitional staffing, not policy decisions

The legal experts don't think it's "small potatoes." How can you possibly think this trust is truly blind, when the kids are in charge of it?
 
The legal experts don't think it's "small potatoes." How can you possibly think this trust is truly blind, when the kids are in charge of it?

what is he supposed to do?? He's gets busy being POTUS, the kids get busy running the business.
That's not a problem unless the worlds collide.

This is WaPo -so take everything they write as inherently hostile to Trump.

f the children run the so-called blind trust and also serve in some governmental capacity, formally or informally, this would further exacerbate potential conflicts and ethical issues caused by not separating his business holdings from his governmental functions," Gross said.
trasional is not "serving in gov't" - Trump ain't POTUS during the transition.
 
what is he supposed to do?? He's gets busy being POTUS, the kids get busy running the business.
That's not a problem unless the worlds collide.

This is WaPo -so take everything they write as inherently hostile to Trump.

trasional is not "serving in gov't" - Trump ain't POTUS during the transition.

You put the businesses in the hands of independent, disinterested third parties and you will have no knowledge of how they manage the assets. Your kids are not disinterested third parties.
 
Back
Top