Here is a copy of my letter I just sent off off a local columnist. She's going on and on about Trump "surprises"
and such:
I titled the Email "Message from the deplorables" --> here is my response
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
yikes! I read our column today (Nov 10) about Trump "surprises".
You might want to consider why the Obama coalition didn't turn out for HRClinton.
For me it was her prime role in assassinating Muammar Qaddafi and creating a terrorist state in Libya - for other's it's probably
as simple as being called "deplorable" by the elitist snobs the Democratic party has become.
Or maybe it's just that she's a corrupt border line criminal -who knows -thankfully she was rejected.
Anyways I'm going to avoid the hyperbole that both Trump and Clinton (and Obama) injected into the campaign.
Oh and that freedom of the press? ( I assume you mean Trumps promising to sue for libel) - you might consider
our main stream press of the NYTimes used "advocacy journalism" -which is a non sequitur in covering Trump.
Or the fact Huffington Post covered him as a "entertainer". or WaPost's barrage of extra reporters they hired to get Trump.
The coverage from all was slanted and salacious.
Fortunately the will of the people has it's own check on a crappy press,and executive over-reach - the vote.
Signed by Proud Deplorable -XXXXXX XXXX
and such:
I titled the Email "Message from the deplorables" --> here is my response
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
yikes! I read our column today (Nov 10) about Trump "surprises".
You might want to consider why the Obama coalition didn't turn out for HRClinton.
For me it was her prime role in assassinating Muammar Qaddafi and creating a terrorist state in Libya - for other's it's probably
as simple as being called "deplorable" by the elitist snobs the Democratic party has become.
Or maybe it's just that she's a corrupt border line criminal -who knows -thankfully she was rejected.
Anyways I'm going to avoid the hyperbole that both Trump and Clinton (and Obama) injected into the campaign.
Oh and that freedom of the press? ( I assume you mean Trumps promising to sue for libel) - you might consider
our main stream press of the NYTimes used "advocacy journalism" -which is a non sequitur in covering Trump.
Or the fact Huffington Post covered him as a "entertainer". or WaPost's barrage of extra reporters they hired to get Trump.
The coverage from all was slanted and salacious.
Fortunately the will of the people has it's own check on a crappy press,and executive over-reach - the vote.
Signed by Proud Deplorable -XXXXXX XXXX
