Althea
Althea told me...
Almost spit coffee on my keypad when I saw the OP
Possible Charges
- Thread starter J Craft
- Start date
it's a silly topic. The first thing is that DoJ is gonna squash much of this when she's in. The political appointees there now will stay or be replaced with her minions.
It's becoming evident that DoJ would have never have enpowered a grand jury -even if Comey called for one back in July ( Emails)
DoJ is hopelessly partisan..it's been creeping that way, but full blown under Obama.
Clinton gets to put her own people in,, is she gonna look for "impartiality?" obviously not.
It's not just Clinton, it's her entire apparatchiks that move into the POTUS -we are screwed.
It's becoming evident that DoJ would have never have enpowered a grand jury -even if Comey called for one back in July ( Emails)
DoJ is hopelessly partisan..it's been creeping that way, but full blown under Obama.
Clinton gets to put her own people in,, is she gonna look for "impartiality?" obviously not.
It's not just Clinton, it's her entire apparatchiks that move into the POTUS -we are screwed.
Cfan never one to care about the truth of anything. How Hannity's list was procured.
As a result of Guiliani’s (1981: In 1981, Giuliani was named Associate Attorney General in the Reagan administration, the third-highest position in the Department of Justice.) statements on Fox News Channel, top conservative talker, Sean Hannity, had his staff post some of the laws that would apply to Hillary Clinton’s activities.The list includes:
Destruction, Alteration, Or Falsification Of Records In Federal Investigations And Bankruptcy
18 U.S.C. § 1519
Class: Felony
Possible Penalty: Imprisonment of no more than 20 years, a fine, or both
Text: “Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States”
Gathering, Transmitting Or Losing Defense Information
18 U.S.C. § 793
Class: Felony
Possible Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years and/or $250,000 fine
Text: “Allowing [by means of gross negligence] any document relating to the national defense to be removed from its proper place of custody or destroyed –or- willfully retaining unauthorized documents relating to national defense and failing to deliver them to the United States employee entitled to receive them –or- failure to report that unauthorized documents relating to national defense were removed from their proper place of custody or destroyed”
Concealment, Removal, Or Mutilation Generally
18 U.S.C. § 2071
Class: Felony
Possible Penalty: Imprisonment of no more than 3 years, a fine, or both
Text: “Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same”
Unauthorized Removal And Retention Of Classified Documents Or Material
18 U.S.C. § 1924
Class: A Misdemeanor
Possible Penalty: Imprisonment for 1 year and/or $100,000 fine
Text: “Knowingly removing materials containing classified information of the United States with the intent to retain said info at an unauthorized location without the authority to do so”
As a result of Guiliani’s (1981: In 1981, Giuliani was named Associate Attorney General in the Reagan administration, the third-highest position in the Department of Justice.) statements on Fox News Channel, top conservative talker, Sean Hannity, had his staff post some of the laws that would apply to Hillary Clinton’s activities.The list includes:
Destruction, Alteration, Or Falsification Of Records In Federal Investigations And Bankruptcy
18 U.S.C. § 1519
Class: Felony
Possible Penalty: Imprisonment of no more than 20 years, a fine, or both
Text: “Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States”
Gathering, Transmitting Or Losing Defense Information
18 U.S.C. § 793
Class: Felony
Possible Penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years and/or $250,000 fine
Text: “Allowing [by means of gross negligence] any document relating to the national defense to be removed from its proper place of custody or destroyed –or- willfully retaining unauthorized documents relating to national defense and failing to deliver them to the United States employee entitled to receive them –or- failure to report that unauthorized documents relating to national defense were removed from their proper place of custody or destroyed”
Concealment, Removal, Or Mutilation Generally
18 U.S.C. § 2071
Class: Felony
Possible Penalty: Imprisonment of no more than 3 years, a fine, or both
Text: “Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same”
Unauthorized Removal And Retention Of Classified Documents Or Material
18 U.S.C. § 1924
Class: A Misdemeanor
Possible Penalty: Imprisonment for 1 year and/or $100,000 fine
Text: “Knowingly removing materials containing classified information of the United States with the intent to retain said info at an unauthorized location without the authority to do so”
You know, laws are available for all to see.I love how no link was posted. Trying to make it seem like an official list from the DOJ.
If she wins- I agree. The depth and level of corruption surrounding her and her minions has shown us the truth of this.
Is it, cumguzzler?
Leonthecat
Racism Watchdog
Poor Irish
evince
Truthmatters
like gonzales
Ronald U. Swanson
Verified User
lol I wonder how the FBI will react to a Trump president if he were to win. then the corruption would have to end.
I almost want him to win just so the corrupt DOJ would be reformed. But then again, that would mean trump would be president and that would not be cool. Weird how this works
I almost want him to win just so the corrupt DOJ would be reformed. But then again, that would mean trump would be president and that would not be cool. Weird how this works
evince
Truthmatters
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy
On December 7, 2006, the George W. Bush administration's Department of Justice ordered the unprecedented[1] midterm dismissal of seven United States Attorneys. Congressional investigations focused on whether the Department of Justice and the White House were using the U.S. Attorney positions for political advantage. Allegations were that some of the attorneys were targeted for dismissal to impede investigations of Republican politicians or that some were targeted for their failure to initiate investigations that would damage Democratic politicians or hamper Democratic-leaning voters.[2][3] The U.S. attorneys were replaced with interim appointees, under provisions in the 2005 USA PATRIOT Act reauthorization.[4][5][6] [7][8]
On December 7, 2006, the George W. Bush administration's Department of Justice ordered the unprecedented[1] midterm dismissal of seven United States Attorneys. Congressional investigations focused on whether the Department of Justice and the White House were using the U.S. Attorney positions for political advantage. Allegations were that some of the attorneys were targeted for dismissal to impede investigations of Republican politicians or that some were targeted for their failure to initiate investigations that would damage Democratic politicians or hamper Democratic-leaning voters.[2][3] The U.S. attorneys were replaced with interim appointees, under provisions in the 2005 USA PATRIOT Act reauthorization.[4][5][6] [7][8]
evince
Truthmatters
The stupid is strong in this one.
Althea
Althea told me...
It's hard to find anything when you're still laughing at the FBI for bringing a Breitbart book as evidence.
I know it's the standard for many here, but in the real world, it's just a bunch of nonsense.
Althea
Althea told me...
What 'Possible' charges could be brought against Trump?
Rape
Racketeering
Tax Evasion
I could go on. Do we always obsess about what 'possible' issues a candidate has?
You can pretend that what Clinton is being investigated for is no "there there", but the only way that charges are not brought, is if she wins.
Then why didn't you post a link so we could examine it further?
Sure, if you've convinced yourself they apply to the person. I can do a list like that for Trump too.