Trump raped me when I was 13...

Educate yourself Hillary is going to prison for pay to play:



Bret Baier: FBI Sources Believe Clinton Foundation Case Moving Towards "Likely an Indictment"



BRET BAIER: Breaking news tonight -- two separate sources with intimate knowledge of the FBI investigations into the Clinton emails and the Clinton Foundation tell Fox the following:

The investigation looking into possible pay-for-play interaction between Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Foundation has been going on for more than a year. Led by the white collar crime division, public corruption branch of the criminal investigative division of the FBI.

The Clinton Foundation investigation is a, quote, "very high priority." Agents have interviewed and reinterviewed multiple people about the Foundation case, and even before the WikiLeaks dumps, agents say they have collected a great deal of evidence. Pressed on that, one sources said, quote, "a lot of it," and "there is an avalanche of new information coming every day."

Some of it from WikiLeaks, some of it from new emails. The agents are actively and aggressively pursuing this case. They will be going back to interview the same people again, some for the third time.

As a result of the limited immunity deals to top aides, including Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson, the Justice Department had tentatively agreed that the FBI would destroy those laptops after a narrow review. We are told definitively that has not happened. Those devices are currently in the FBI field office here in Washington, D.C. and are being exploited.

The source points out that any immunity deal is null and void if any subject lied at any point in the investigation.

Meantime, the classified e-mail investigation is being run by the National Security division of the FBI. They are currently combing through former Democratic Congressman Anthony Wiener's laptop and have found e-mails that they believe came from Hillary Clinton's server that appear to be new, as in not duplicates.

Whether they contain classified material or not is not yet known. It will likely be known soon. All of this just as we move inside one week until election day.


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...ctment_likely_in_clinton_foundation_case.html

This isn't some zero hedge/prison planet source this is Bret Baier citing two separate FBI sources that the Clinton Foundation investigation has been going on for over a year and that barring any obstruction they intend to indict.

1) Its Bret Baier not exactly a respected journalist, instead a Fox Clown.
2) Funny how the "Liberal" media wont publish the 13 year old rape story because its based on anonymous sources, yet this story gets out.
3) Funny how its coming out three days before election day.
4) You cant indict a president, they must be impeached... removed then indicted.
 
1) Its Bret Baier not exactly a respected journalist, instead a Fox Clown.

That's a load of bullshit Bret Baier isn't Oreilly or Hannity you ignorant fuck, Bret Baier is a real journalist like Brit Hume and Chris Wallace, you're the clown as is CNN and MSNBC which were proven conclusively by wikileaks to have actively colluded with the Clinton campaign.

2) Funny how the "Liberal" media wont publish the 13 year old rape story because its based on anonymous sources, yet this story gets out.

No it won't publish the story because she accused Clinton as well you ignorant fuck, she's a nut looking for a buck.

3) Funny how its coming out three days before election day.

From multiple sources who are fed up with the DOJ stonewalling because they know she broke the law.

4) You cant indict a president, they must be impeached... removed then indicted.

That is not a fact it is a contested subject these were not crimes that she committed as POTUS ans there is nothing whatsoever which prevents indicting the President but if elected will be impeached and the FBI will indict.
 
That's a load of bullshit Bret Baier isn't Oreilly or Hannity you ignorant fuck, Bret Baier is a real journalist like Brit Hume and Chris Wallace, you're the clown as is CNN and MSNBC which were proven conclusively by wikileaks to have actively colluded with the Clinton campaign.

No it won't publish the story because she accused Clinton as well you ignorant fuck, she's a nut looking for a buck.

From multiple sources who are fed up with the DOJ stonewalling because they know she broke the law.

That is not a fact it is a contested subject these were not crimes that she committed as POTUS ans there is nothing whatsoever which prevents indicting the President but if elected will be impeached and the FBI will indict.

1) He is a clown.
2) She did not accuse Bill Clinton of rape, but of attending the party. Big difference, BTW Bill Clinton is not going to be on the ballot.
3) If they want the story told by the honest media and paid attention to by a broad group, they should have the balls to come out, its not like they are rape victims.
4) Simply False.
 
1) He is a clown.

He's a respected journalist not a talking head you ignorant putz.

2) She did not accuse Bill Clinton of rape, but of attending the party. Big difference,

Oh ya, he was just attending child prostitute sex parties? Why?

BTW Bill Clinton is not going to be on the ballot.

The head of the Bimbo Eruption Squad who intimidated Juanita Broderick into silence is.

3) If they want the story told by the honest media and paid attention to by a broad group, they should have the balls to come out, its not like they are rape victims.

4) Simply False.

Show me where in the Constitution that it says the POTUS can't be charged with a crime, or barring that show me the SCOTUS ruling on the matter, I'll wait.
 
He's a respected journalist not a talking head you ignorant putz.

Oh ya, he was just attending child prostitute sex parties? Why?

The head of the Bimbo Eruption Squad who intimidated Juanita Broderick into silence is.

Show me where in the Constitution that it says the POTUS can't be charged with a crime, or barring that show me the SCOTUS ruling on the matter, I'll wait.

1) He does not even work for a news corporation, he works for a Conservative Entertainment company.
2) Evidence that she did that?
3) I don't think it was a "child prostitute sex party" but Trump was there and he is on the ballot and accused of raping a 13 year old.
4) http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1887&context=fss_papers
 
1) He does not even work for a news corporation, he works for a Conservative Entertainment company.

So far the only major 24/7 news network which has not been proven to actively colluded with a Presidential campaign is Fox.

2) Evidence that she did that?


Three weeks after the alleged assault, Broaddrick participated in a small Clinton fundraiser at the home of a local dentist.[3] Broaddrick said she was “in denial” and felt guilty, thinking that she had given Clinton the wrong idea by letting him into her room.[3] When she arrived at the event, she says, her friend who had picked the Clintons up from the airport told her that Hillary Clinton had asked if she would be at the event.[10] Broaddrick says Bill Clinton did not speak to her at the event, but Hillary Clinton approached her, took her hand, and said "I just want you to know how much Bill and I appreciate what you do for him.”[10] When Broaddrick moved her hand away, she says, Hillary Clinton held on to her and said, "Do you understand? Everything that you do."[10] Broaddrick says she felt nauseated and left the gathering. Broaddrick says she interpreted the incident as Hillary Clinton thanking her for keeping quiet.[10]


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juanita_Broaddrick

3) I don't think it was a "child prostitute sex party" but Trump was there and he is on the ballot and accused of raping a 13 year old.

Ah I see there were child prostitutes available for sex but it wasn't a child prostitute sex party. And this 13 yo just happens to be after tens of millions of dollars instead of a criminal conviction, you're a laughable shill.


That is not a legal verdict it is one man's opinion without any force of law, like I said it is a contested subject, didn’t you claim to be a lawyer? Where did you get your degree? Honduras?
 
Since we're posting opinion:


Yes, You Can Indict the President
By GARY L. MCDOWELL
Updated March 9, 1998 12:01 a.m. ET
In the next few weeks Kenneth Starr is likely to find himself at a particularly vexatious fork in the legal road he has been traveling these past four years. From the earliest Whitewater fraud investigations, through Travelgate and Filegate, to the allegations of possible perjury and witness tampering emanating from the Monica Lewinsky matter, Mr. Starr will have to decide where to go with whatever evidence of presidential wrongdoing he has uncovered.

One path, undoubtedly the smoother one, would lead him to the House of Representatives under the independent counsel statute, which obligates him to inform that House of any impeachable offenses. The other more treacherous way would take the independent counsel directly to a criminal indictment against President Clinton. Unfortunately, he is not likely to find much guidance in most of the recent discussions of these weighty matters.


http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB889218754227546000
 
It's their big last try...it's old news...been tossed out over the years, knew the story would come up again.
No...it hasn't. Epstein has already been convicted of soliciting sex from an underage girl. He paid off as many victims as Michael Jackson did.

His rape parties are no secret. This is a civil suit with a witness who supplied the little girls to Epstein.
 
So far the only major 24/7 news network which has not been proven to actively colluded with a Presidential campaign is Fox.




Three weeks after the alleged assault, Broaddrick participated in a small Clinton fundraiser at the home of a local dentist.[3] Broaddrick said she was “in denial” and felt guilty, thinking that she had given Clinton the wrong idea by letting him into her room.[3] When she arrived at the event, she says, her friend who had picked the Clintons up from the airport told her that Hillary Clinton had asked if she would be at the event.[10] Broaddrick says Bill Clinton did not speak to her at the event, but Hillary Clinton approached her, took her hand, and said "I just want you to know how much Bill and I appreciate what you do for him.”[10] When Broaddrick moved her hand away, she says, Hillary Clinton held on to her and said, "Do you understand? Everything that you do."[10] Broaddrick says she felt nauseated and left the gathering. Broaddrick says she interpreted the incident as Hillary Clinton thanking her for keeping quiet.[10]


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juanita_Broaddrick



Ah I see there were child prostitutes available for sex but it wasn't a child prostitute sex party. And this 13 yo just happens to be after tens of millions of dollars instead of a criminal conviction, you're a laughable shill.



That is not a legal verdict it is one man's opinion without any force of law, like I said it is a contested subject, didn’t you claim to be a lawyer? Where did you get your degree? Honduras?


I am done discussing things with you, but I will say that the 13 year old and the child rape charge are as creditable as Broaddrick's story.
 
Holy Roman Polanski

For shame on you Donald Trump!

article-2431216-1BCF2144000005DC-309_634x969.jpg

Roman Polanski's 13 year old rape victim!
 
No...it hasn't. Epstein has already been convicted of soliciting sex from an underage girl. He paid off as many victims as Michael Jackson did.

His rape parties are no secret. This is a civil suit with a witness who supplied the little girls to Epstein.

Rape parties attended by none other than Bill Clinton according to this woman.
 
I am done discussing things with you, but I will say that the 13 year old and the child rape charge are as creditable as Broaddrick's story.

No they are not, this woman has not come forward publically, Broaddrick has 5 witnesses, has never sought a penny, and only came forward when accused of taking a bribe to stay silent. And; furthermore, she isn't 13 she's 35.
 
I am done discussing things with you, but I will say that the 13 year old and the child rape charge are as creditable as Broaddrick's story.

Talk to Hi-LIAR-y and if the accusation is true, she'll say the 13 year old initiated her own rape.

Hell; she's already done it, before.
 
I read an article today that pointed out Obama was closer to Romney 4 days out than HRC is to Trump.

if you read nate silver he says the difference this election is we have much higher uncertainty. There are a larger number of people that still haven't made up their minds that could break either direction at the last second. Another point is there hasn't been a lot of polling in some key states like colorado, michigan, PA, to help us figure out where people are standing.
 
if you read nate silver he says the difference this election is we have much higher uncertainty. There are a larger number of people that still haven't made up their minds that could break either direction at the last second. Another point is there hasn't been a lot of polling in some key states like colorado, michigan, PA, to help us figure out where people are standing.

The reason the polling is all over the place is because nobody knows what models to use. Early polling where Crooked Hillary had a bigger lead they modeled black turnout similar to Obama. Well we know that to be false. But by how much? Don't know. We know the illegal spics are turning out because they know she will give them amnesty.
 
Woman will be going on record tonight during Prime Time to tell the details about how Trump raped her at a Jeffry Epstein party when she was 13 years old.

Will the networks cover it?
Will they ignore it?

Is HRC behind this, if so is she getting desperate?

Will it work?

_______

I don't know if the CORPORATE media will cover this or not, they are in the hot seat here.
HRC is not behind this, their is an article about who is at the Daily Beast, http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/07/21/trump-rape-accusers-turn-on-each-other.html.
I doubt it will get momentum because that would require the networks to cover it and her to be convincing in the interview.

Interestingly... here is a quote on Jeffry Epstein from Donald Trump... “I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy, he’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it ― Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

Another "pussy" accusation....from the PUSSY PARTY. Who'd thunk it? :)
 
Back
Top