Just a thought I had...

Mr.Badguy

Mr.Badguy

Super lefty
Maybe people who know more about the law can chime in here. I know evidence obtained illegally by law enforcement is inadmissable in court, but everything I've searched is fuzzy on evidence obtained illegally from other sources.

If Hillary is ever investigated again for the things revealed by wiki leaks, could the documents even be used against her in court? Is court use even relevant, or is the court of public opinion enough?
 
Mr.Badguy said:
Maybe people who know more about the law can chime in here. I know evidence obtained illegally by law enforcement is inadmissable in court, but everything I've searched is fuzzy on evidence obtained illegally from other sources.

If Hillary is ever investigated again for the things revealed by wiki leaks, could the documents even be used against her in court? Is court use even relevant, or is the court of public opinion enough?
Click to expand...

the evidence taken from the internet would not have been illegally obtained by the police and therefore would be available for her conviction......of course, it would be superfluous since the testimony in front of Congress and the results of the FBI investigation will be sufficient to convict her of perjury......
 
One of the examples I read was a case involving corporate espionage where the company hacked the person they thought had hacked them in order to gather evidence, and that case was dismissed. That didn't involve the police obtaining evidence illegally.
 
Mr.Badguy said:
One of the examples I read was a case involving corporate espionage where the company hacked the person they thought had hacked them in order to gather evidence, and that case was dismissed. That didn't involve the police obtaining evidence illegally.
Click to expand...

did the police download the information from the internet after the corporation that engaged in the espionage published it for every single person in the world to see?.......
 
A. The emails are hearsay.
B. They don't show HRC doing anything illegal.
 
the only direct illegality is the Donald Duck trolling ( but it's only a hearsay tape by O'Keefe.)
It could be investigated,but once POTUS it would not be,unless it went to Impeachment

Her slimyness, and cronyism stand regardless of any out right conviction.
If she managed to dodge the "gross negligence" of the FBI -she's golden -and she can now directly politicize DoJ like Obama did with Holder.
 
Jarod said:
B. They don't show HRC doing anything illegal.
Click to expand...
I will admit that emails saying she was given debate questions before the debate don't show her doing something which illegal.......but......
the emails instructing people to give special treatment to people who have contributed to CGI certainly show that people under her orders at the state department were doing something illegal for her........
 
Jarod said:
A. The emails are hearsay.
B. They don't show HRC doing anything illegal.
Click to expand...

They along with Project Veritas show illegal coordination with outside groups. But we know you are good with overlooking laws you democrats find inconvenient.

Laws are for everyone else right?
 
What a lame controversy. Why would anybody think Hillary needed to be thrown this softball in advance of the debate? Everybody has an opinion about the death penalty.

19 states and the District of Columbia have banned the death penalty. 31 states, including Ohio, still have the death penalty. According to the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, since 1973, 156 people have been on death row and later set free. Since 1976, 1,414 people have been executed in the U.S. That’s 11% of Americans who were sentenced to die, but later exonerated and freed. Should Ohio and the 30 other states join the current list and abolish the death penalty?
 
Furthermore, the question was asked at a NH town hall, not a debate, so how did she know what an audience member would ask? I thought audience members came with their own questions.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
apparently someone who worked at CNN and someone on her campaign thought so or they wouldn't have given her the question in advance of the debate.....
Click to expand...

Actually it was a town hall Q & A appearance. I guess cons are now going to move the goalposts and say the audience member who asked the question was a plant.
 
christiefan915 said:
Actually it was a town hall Q & A appearance. I guess cons are now going to move the goalposts and say the audience member who asked the question was a plant.
Click to expand...

oh no......I'm sure that every single one of those people were randomly chosen at the last minute and were not required to tell anyone in advance what they were going to ask the candidates......after all, we all know how much Hilliary likes surprises........
 
PostmodernProphet said:
oh no......I'm sure that every single one of those people were randomly chosen at the last minute and were not required to tell anyone in advance what they were going to ask the candidates......after all, we all know how much Hilliary likes surprises........
Click to expand...

Then the same has to apply to Trump town hall attendees.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
does it?......does the same rule apply to the contracts his state department lets on Haiti repairs.......does the same rule apply to the wikileaks about his emails?.....
Click to expand...

All you've got is moving the goalposts?

We don't know what wikileaks has on Trump because their purpose is to ruin Hillary. So much for being impartial.
 
christiefan915 said:
All you've got is moving the goalposts?

We don't know what wikileaks has on Trump because their purpose is to ruin Hillary. So much for being impartial.
Click to expand...

actually my goalposts are right where they were when the election started......you're the one that's been dodging them for the last three months.......
 
Any thoughts as to the fact that Clinton lied to Congress about her emails? Isn't that illegal, regardless of what is in them, or how they became public?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top