Red Pill success stories :)

tsuke said:
yes it is much better to cater to the needs of the rich donors rather than the majority.

I dont know if you have noticed this yet but both sides use lawyers to interpret the constitution to say what they want it to say. Right now what is constitutional or not is purely decided by who has a majority on the court.
Click to expand...


The constitution isn't really all that complicated to follow if you are sincerely supporting and defending it. When we decide something is constitutional or not based on your political affiliation or how much money influences it then you are not supporting or defending it you are using it as a tool for your own gain. The constitution says what the federal government can do and if it doesn't mention something then its then delegated to the states which all have their own constitutions. When candidates put their constituents above the constitution then it becomes watered down, manipulated, and meaningless. Trump, just like Clinton, does not talk about or give any sort of hint that he will follow the constitution but instead is appealing to the masses that cheer for him the loudest, but ultimately will do what's best for him, not the constitution.
 
Cowgirl Up said:
The constitution isn't really all that complicated to follow if you are sincerely supporting and defending it. When we decide something is constitutional or not based on your political affiliation or how much money influences it then you are not supporting or defending it you are using it as a tool for your own gain. The constitution says what the federal government can do and if it doesn't mention something then its then delegated to the states which all have their own constitutions. When candidates put their constituents above the constitution then it becomes watered down, manipulated, and meaningless. Trump, just like Clinton, does not talk about or give any sort of hint that he will follow the constitution but instead is appealing to the masses that cheer for him the loudest, but ultimately will do what's best for him, not the constitution.
Click to expand...

The people who are pure of heart like you who are interested in defending the constitution dont actually have the power to defend it. Once you do get that power you are then tempted to subvert it for your ends and all of our politicians have failed that test. :)
 
Democrats talking about federalism??? give me a break! They have no governing concept of separation of powers.
 
Thing1 said:
Trump really has a lot of people conned.

He's not an agent of change. He's a guy who wanted to elevate his brand, and can't believe he actually got the nomination. He doesn't understand the issues at all.

Do people even know what he's promised to replace Obamacare with? He has only really spoken about it once. It's taxpayer funded universal healthcare.
Click to expand...
Are you truly that lazy or dimwitted?

www.donaldjtrump.com/positions/healthcare-reform

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top