Colin Powell says he's voting for Clinton

signalmankenneth

Verified User
What sane person isn't voting for Hillary?

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/25/politics/colin-powell-hillary-clinton-endorsement/index.html

was2753849.jpg
 
"Old news. Colin Powell has long since sold out." G #2
I agree that Secretary Powell's Iraq War casus belli presentation to the U.N. General Assembly devastated an otherwise extremely impressive résumé.

Secretary Powell is the only person I know that began his U.S. military career at the rank of Private, and rose to Chairman of the JCS; AND BEYOND !!

EXTREMELY impressive.

"Sold out", the accusation on the table here, refers to treacherous whoredom; sacrificing principle for personal gain.

I challenge the accuser, or anyone else, to specify what principle Powell sacrificed, and what personal gain he ostensibly obtained in exchange.
Powell was Secretary of State; a high-ranking U.S. presidential cabinet officer position.
Hillary Clinton was too.

"Sold out" to who? For what?
~Thurs. Aug. 25, 2016 on CBS / Stephen Colbert, interview guest and Hillary Clinton VP running-mate Senator Tim Kaine was asked about Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump's then recent accusation that “Hillary Clinton's a bigot.” Senator Kaine replied:
“When Hillary Clinton got out of law school she was workin' to help advance racial justice in the juvenile justice system in South Carolina, and fight school segregation in Alabama. And I about that time got out of school and was battling housing discrimination in the South, & in Virginia.
At his early career Donald Trump was a real estate guy who got sued by the Justice Department for discriminating against people in housing, writing the letter “C” on applications if they were minority. Umm, he ... Hillary Clinton's got a track-record all the way back to being a middle-schooler in a Methodist youth group of trying to advance priorities for others. And Donald Trump's for himself.” [& has said so explicitly]
Senator (and 2016 Democrat VP candidate) Tim Kaine

"Over the years, the United States has sent many of its fine young men and women into great peril to fight for freedom beyond our borders. The only amount of land we have ever asked for in return is enough to bury those that did not return." U.S. Secretary Colin Powell
 
I agree that Secretary Powell's Iraq War casus belli presentation to the U.N. General Assembly devastated an otherwise extremely impressive résumé.

Secretary Powell is the only person I know that began his U.S. military career at the rank of Private, and rose to Chairman of the JCS; AND BEYOND !!

EXTREMELY impressive.

"Sold out", the accusation on the table here, refers to treacherous whoredom; sacrificing principle for personal gain.

I challenge the accuser, or anyone else, to specify what principle Powell sacrificed, and what personal gain he ostensibly obtained in exchange.
Powell was Secretary of State; a high-ranking U.S. presidential cabinet officer position.
Hillary Clinton was too.

"Sold out" to who? For what?

Look at the emails he wrote about Hillary and Bill. As for motive? Simple. I don't think people understand that DC is a liberal town from top to bottom. As long as Powell tows a lefty line you don't hear the media talk about him, Iraq and Valerie Plame. It is like Teddy Kennedy being forgiven for murder as long as he stayed pro abortion.
 
Old news. Colin Powell has long since sold out.

....i.e.....Powell was the first to recognize The DICK; Cheney, had TRUMPED-UP the justifications for....
The CHICKENHAWKS' WAR!!!!


December 19, 2008 - "The centerpiece of the Bush administration’s case for an invasion of Iraq, the presentation that laid out the key pieces of intelligence the U.S. government had gathered about Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction and his purported links to al-Qaeda terrorists, was delivered by Secretary of State Colin Powell at the United Nations on February 5, 2003. It was a historic speech, and yet it was one that Powell, who had argued against the war for months, was probably far from comfortable delivering.

On Wednesday, January 29, a week earlier, Powell appeared in the doorway between his seventh-floor office at the State Department and that of his chief of staff, Larry Wilkerson, and handed Wilkerson a 48-page dossier that had been sent over by the White House.

The document, which the White House intended that Powell use as the basis of his speech, was a laundry list of intelligence gathered by the government about Iraq’s weapons programs. It had been cobbled together in Vice President Richard Cheney’s office by a team led by Cheney’s chief of staff, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, and John Hannah, the vice president’s deputy assistant for national-security affairs—both well-known administration hawks. A few days earlier, Libby had presided over a meeting in the White House Situation Room in which he laid out the case against Iraq, producing what one administration official called a “Chinese menu” of material.

“Go out to C.I.A.,” Powell instructed his staff chief, take whomever you need, and start work on the speech. By the next night Wilkerson, along with several staffers and a revolving group of C.I.A. analysts, was ensconced in a conference room down the hall from Director of Central Intelligence (D.C.I.) George Tenet’s office at C.I.A. headquarters, in Langley, Virginia. The White House supplied 45 more pages on Iraq’s links to terrorism and its human-rights violations. By the end of the first day, though, Wilkerson and the others did something surprising: they threw out the White House dossier, now grown to more than 90 pages. They suspected much of it had originated with the Iraqi National Congress (I.N.C.) and its chief, Ahmad Chalabi, a smooth-talking Iraqi former banker, whose family had fled Iraq in 1958, when Chalabi was 13. The I.N.C., an exile group based in London, had been supplying U.S. intelligence with Iraqi defectors whose information had often proved suspect or fabricated. The problem with the I.N.C. was that its information came with an overt agenda. As the I.N.C.’s Washington adviser, Francis Brooke, admits, he urged the exile group to do what it could to make the case for war: “I told them, as their campaign manager, ‘Go get me a terrorist and some W.M.D., because that’s what the Bush administration is interested in.’ ”

As for Iraq’s links to al-Qaeda, Powell’s staff was convinced that much of that material had been funneled directly to Cheney by a tiny, separate intelligence unit set up by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. “We were so appalled at what had arrived from the White House,” says one official.


Instead, the group turned to the C.I.A. analysts and started from scratch. That night, and every night for the next several days, Powell went to Langley to oversee the process. In Tenet’s conference room, joined by the D.C.I. and at times by National-Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, Scooter Libby, and C.I.A. deputy director John McLaughlin, the secretary of state demanded to know the sources and reliability of the information he had been given.

For everyone involved, it was a tense and frustrating process. At one point, according to several witnesses, Powell tossed several documents in the air and snapped, “This is bullshit!”





Colin Powell
Born: April 5, 1937

ARIES!!!
*
OX!!!
 
Last edited:
" DC is a liberal town from top to bottom. " #12
a) DC has an influx of population from every State in the union.
If that legislator influx shifts DC toward liberalism; that would seem to indicate the nation of States that elected them is liberal.

b) "Liberal"? I thought the gun rights cause was claimed by Republicans.
But haven't some of the strictest gun restrictions in the nation formerly applied in DC been relaxed recently?

If so, one of two things would seem to be true.
- Either liberalism may more broadly represent the will of the People than you wish to suggest; or
- liberalism may not be the bane you'd have us believe.
 
Look at the emails he wrote about Hillary and Bill. As for motive? Simple. I don't think people understand that DC is a liberal town from top to bottom. As long as Powell tows a lefty line you don't hear the media talk about him, Iraq and Valerie Plame. It is like Teddy Kennedy being forgiven for murder as long as he stayed pro abortion.


a) DC has an influx of population from every State in the union.
If that legislator influx shifts DC toward liberalism; that would seem to indicate the nation of States that elected them is liberal.

b) "Liberal"? I thought the gun rights cause was claimed by Republicans.
But haven't some of the strictest gun restrictions in the nation formerly applied in DC been relaxed recently?

If so, one of two things would seem to be true.
- Either liberalism may more broadly represent the will of the People than you wish to suggest; or
- liberalism may not be the bane you'd have us believe.

TAKE IT.....TEFLON DON!!!!!
jDjkYvc.gif
 
#18

I don't know what that means, or to whom it's intended to refer.

BUT !!

I acknowledge, since the GWB administration, the GOP has been set adrift.

The Republicans used to be notorious for ideological / political cohesion.
But since the younger President Bush left office, the Republican party has made the Democrats look organized!
 
#18

I don't know what that means, or to whom it's intended to refer.

BUT !!

I acknowledge, since the GWB administration, the GOP has been set adrift.

The Republicans used to be notorious for ideological / political cohesion.
But since the younger President Bush left office, the Republican party has made the Democrats look organized!
once we can blow up the Republican establishment, the Dems are hopefully next.. unless one prefers this plutocratic yoke we 'enjoy' now?
 
Back
Top