Elizabeth Warren To Trump: ‘Nasty Women Have Really Had It With Guys Like You’

Priceless....democrats pretending they give a rats ass about a woman's right to vote, considering the history actual involving a democrat stance against all civil rights legislation to have ever existed in this nation where women and minorities are concerned...ranging from the 13,14, and 15th amendments to the 19th amendments granting women the right to vote in all elections.

Yep....2010 is almost 100 years ago....if you are attempting to hide from the reality that the democrat senate had a sitting member that belonged to the KKK (Robert Byrd). Or if you attempt to defend the democratic party history concerning slavery and civil rights by declaring that those evil democrats are now republicans and the republican party that championed women's suffrage and civil rights for all citizens to include former slaves and native american citizens ....are now DEMOCRATS. Yep...up is down, north is south....and black is white. :palm:

The reality? The south has only became conservative from the 1970s forward because the jobs and industry (you know how those capitalistic republican assholes like big business) have moved south because of the high cost of doing business in the all the northern blue states due to over regulation, taxation and social unionism. Now....to hear the denial concerning the documented voting record of democrats concerning equal rights, suffrage for women and the right of both minorities and women to own property and vote.....THE DEMOCRATS in this nation suddenly repented of this documented mistreatment of women and others and now are historically responsible for championing women's rights and black equality against the evil ass republicans.

Just how stupid do you assume THE PEOPLE to be....other than the women and blacks that sold their souls in the 30s in order to take part in FDR's NEW COMMUNIST DEAL. Funny as Hell. You can run but you can't hide from the simple truth...clearly democrats have not changed their spots....just look at recent history. Slick willy using young female interns demanding blow jobs in the white house while Hilldabeats attacks the young WOMEN victims of this abuse of power. But...now they are the party of civil rights? Look at the 64 civil rights act.....how long did the democrats filibuster that bill before they decided they needed the BLACK VOTES in order to get the bigot LBJ elected?

What? Is June 10, 1964 100 years removed from today's history? The congressional record clearly shows that a democrat congress filibustered the 1964 civil rights act for 57 days...their leader? A democrat senator by the name of Bob Byrd. Laugh My Ass Off:) Another historical reality? Less that 1% of all congressional (both houses) representatives have CHANGED POLITICAL SIDES sine the major parties came into existence in the early 1800s.

The spin is...the entire south changed sides because of politics (LMAO) the reality.....Vocational jobs moved from the north to the south...and the change is RECENT HISTORY.
 
Last edited:
Ralph said:
Right,,err, LEFT....no deflection, no denial going on here folks....MOVEon.ORG. There was nothing mentioned at all about DIRTY WOMEN VOTING in the OP ED propaganda piece, I must be illiterate.....DIRTY must not count as being DEPLORABLE in the English language...and DIRTY WOMEN VOTING sure as hell must be off topic. My BAD....I would have never brought up a democratic history lesson on dirty women voting...if I could just read.

LMAO Who said Alinsky was dead? Of course....democrats HAVE always supported and defended equal rights for women with absolutely no personal attacks against women. Absolutely I agree....its off topic to bring up history actual and introduce it as facts in evidence, today's democrats have switched sides....they were once republicans don't ya know...back when they used to attack women and support the KKK..etc., you know ancient history like 2010, when the last democrat clan member died in office, of course he was an evil ass republican pretending to be a democrat just to make the democrats look bad, and slick willy never once used young female interns, especially by insulting them with a pat on the ass or (calling them whores or fat asses just ask Hilldabeat or any of the democrat females (or nadless males) around here...that little whore was just asking for it..she came to DC looking for some strange), that would be beneath an honorable democrat....a BLOW JOB on the other hand with Hilldabeast's blessings......... :)

And of course the fix was in by the evil ass conservatives...the cum stains and DNA were planted....they must have went to one of Slick's sperm bank deposits...and paid the intern to say she gave the president a blow job.

Nope....no democrat, especially one running for president would EVER, EVER attack another female and call her a little whore wanting some strange, victimizing poor little Bill. Clearly...just like Trump....all those who accused Bill and Hilldabeast were just whores seeking their 15 minutes of fame by using the Clinton's.

My Bad...of course TRUMP is an evil male that uses women....Bill and Hilldabeast were victims of whores.

This is fun...to bad there's only a couple of weeks left in this entertainment cycle. The dirty laundry is flying everywhere....who needs any investigating it seems like the campaign managers have done their homework. I simply love one democrat shill attacking another democrat shill. Its a most difficult thing picking sides...but I must go with the PROFESSIONAL.... I've got to vote for the Hilldabeast...she knows her shit about bilking the gullible.
Click to expand...

Get off your high horse Ralphie and try to remember that it was a republican who said Anita Hill was "a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty."

Name-calling goes both ways when M E N are looking for ways to denigrate women.
 
christiefan915 said:
Get off your high horse Ralphie and try to remember that it was a republican who said Anita Hill was "a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty."

Name-calling goes both ways when M E N are looking for ways to denigrate women.
Click to expand...

Right....err....LEFT, an "accusation" that was never proven...certainly refutes the history actual of the democratic party's record regarding the endorsement of the KKK, refusing to allow women and blacks the right to vote or own property, filibustering the civil rights legislation in the 60s.... legislating JIM CROW laws at the federal level....being the only political party that ever used nuclear weapons on other human beings....yep, that entire history is made null and void by a left wing dog and phony show that mirrors the national enquirer. Indeed....PUSSY...most certainly "TRUMPS" (wink, wink) everything for a leftist...its all that's been discussed by the left wing media. Indeed the party of morality.

Yep....there is no attempted DEFLECTION or DENIAL going on here....proceed, tell us again how the left suddenly became the right from the 60s to date and how up is down, north is south...etc., now its TIME TO MOVEON.ORG because a Black Supreme Court Judge was attacked by you leftists? But you are the party of the minorities? Why then do you constantly paste attacks on Women and Blacks as if that is going to generate anger in others..when in reality it demonstrates your own parties bigotry and hypocrisy? LMAO...again. :)

By the way....exactly when was Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas convicted and removed from office for all those "egregious" sexual perversions? I can't seem to remember when that conviction took place. LMAO

Just more Alinsky bullshit.

1. Accuse void of any evidence 2. Attack based upon those accusations as if they were true 3. Deflect away from the fact THERE ARE NO FACTS in evidence ....................

If these accusations were TRUE...and PROVEN, Clarence Thomas must have been removed from office and his position of power and authority over women, just like Bill Clinton was impeached...right..err...left comrade? Truth: The only crime the left convicted Justice Thomas of was BEING BLACK AND CONSERVATIVE. :)
 
Last edited:
Every one take note concerning these communist apologists....EVERYONE that posts on this site and attempts to defend the democrat history of racism, bigotry, criminal activity and inhumane acts such as being the only political party to ever use a nuke on fellow human beings....THEY NEVER PRESENT ANYTHING other than pasted propaganda deflections. Priceless. Look through the archives...its constant, there is never any testable objective evidence presented when they are attempting to apologize and defend the record found in history actual...its always some national enquirer type of deflection. Just like the Clarence Thomas "ACCUSATION"....that never convicted anyone..but that somehow PROVES that all conservatives are guilty because of an unfounded and unproven ACCUSATION?

Yep...those communist accusations make all of history null and void. Truth: They don't enjoy being exposed in their LIES. :)
 
Rana said:
Oh, okay cawacko, another conspiracy nutter.
Click to expand...

Really? That's why liberal leaning Polifact won't even make a ruling on the topic? Come on Rana, you can do better than that. That's like Desh calling people racist to try and shut down conversation.
 
And Rana, read other liberal sites such as the New Yorker which acknowledge there's no evidence to back her claim. Are they part of a conspiracy against her as well?
 
cawacko said:
Really? That's why liberal leaning Polifact won't even make a ruling on the topic? Come on Rana, you can do better than that. That's like Desh calling people racist to try and shut down conversation.
Click to expand...

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/06/warren-may-not-be-indian-trump-still-not-right.html

So the big question is whether Warren’s claimed minority status made her more attractive to the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard, where she taught on and off from the late ’80s up to her run for the Senate. That hasn’t been definitively ruled out, but several people involved in Warren’s hiring have said her heritage didn’t come up while they were considering her. “I can state categorically that the subject of her Native American ancestry never once was mentioned,” said Charles Fried, who worked in the Reagan administration and served as the head of the Harvard committee that considered Warren.
The Atlantic highlights another big piece of evidence supporting Warren’s version of events: While Harvard was facing criticism for its lack of faculty diversity at the time, the Harvard Crimson article announcing Warren’s hiring in 1995 does not note that she was (possibly) the first Native American on the law school’s faculty.
 
Rana said:
Apparently, you don't know that that isn't the case.

http://www.dailynewsbin.com/news/fa...stry-no-she-never-used-it-to-get-a-job/25004/
Click to expand...

Yep....that certainly proves it. More cut and paste left wing propaganda apologetic crap. He said, she said, he said....and none of the crap disproves the demonstrable, testable fact that the democrat party is the party historically known for making war on women and blacks in relation to the basic rights of voting and owning property.

INDEED nasty women have the same right to vote as do nasty men....BUT the historical fact of how women and blacks received that RIGHT TO VOTE certainly is not due to any support from the democrat party that championed that equality case...in fact the opposite is true, the democrat party has a long and documented history of declaring war on the rights of women and minorities in suppressing those basic rights of being human in a free society.... all those nasty female voters owe that right to CONSERVATIVES....not the fascist practices of the democrat party.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top