Rigging the Election-Video I:Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallie

Poor fucking Trumptards with no self control. They could incite violence with a simple t-shirt. Where is your outrage at the lack of personal responsibility?

And, where are the libs' self control to not be incited by a t-shirt.........or for that matter, allowing the reps to enjoy their private function rallies and their right of free speech without causing riots?
 
SURE you do.

Why wouldn't the Clinton campaign send people to Trump rallies to get the word out about their candidate?

You call it "inciting violence" ONLY because dim bulb Trumpkins can't ignore a few bad words said about their Messiah and respond with physical violence.

Uhhhhhhhh no. There was not one report on any network of reps appearing at lib rallies burning flags, throwing eggs, overturning cop cars and beating up attendees, etc.
 
And, where are the libs' self control to not be incited by a t-shirt.........or for that matter, allowing the reps to enjoy their private function rallies and their right of free speech without causing riots?

If a Planned Parenthood or "Trump Sucks" t-shirt incites you to violence, you should be on meds. Of course, if you support Trump, you should be on meds anyway.

You're ignorant on the right to free speech, too, I see.
 
LOL. Oh my gosh. The word 'ignorant' gets a lot of play here.

The whole ideeeeeeaaaaahhhhhh of enjoying a private function filled with free speech prooooves awareness of our free speech rights.

Neither of those t-shirts should incite violence...that's the point!!!!!

I believe in free speech without reprisal of violence in either circumstance.

Good grief.....hard to post brief comments........lots of extra 'splaining is needed. :whoa:
 
LOL. Oh my gosh. The word 'ignorant' gets a lot of play here.

The whole ideeeeeeaaaaahhhhhh of enjoying a private function filled with free speech prooooves awareness of our free speech rights.

Neither of those t-shirts should incite violence...that's the point!!!!!

I believe in free speech without reprisal of violence in either circumstance.

Good grief.....hard to post brief comments........lots of extra 'splaining is needed. :whoa:

I call you ignorant because you continually and chronically exhibit that characteristic. I'll start with something simple for the simpleton. Do you have any fucking idea what free speech entails? I ask because it's obvious you don't.
 
I'll go with the obvious. Free speech - the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint (Oxford dictionary)

What's the beef?
 
I'll go with the obvious. Free speech - the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint (Oxford dictionary)

What's the beef?

(laughing) What a fucking retard. Go to a simpleton's response. I didn't ask for the Oxford short definition. As is obvious, any moron (you) can cut and paste a definition. I'll try to type more slowly.

Do you know what the right to free speech entails and how it is infringed?

Let's
 
(laughing) What a fucking retard. Go to a simpleton's response. I didn't ask for the Oxford short definition. As is obvious, any moron (you) can cut and paste a definition. I'll try to type more slowly.

Do you know what the right to free speech entails and how it is infringed?

Let's

One infringement would be the "harm principle'. So?

Look, just keep on speaking...it's your right, OK? Geeeeesh, be happy already.
 
One infringement would be the "harm principle'. So?

Look, just keep on speaking...it's your right, OK? Geeeeesh, be happy already.

OK, as painful and slow as this process is becoming, I'll continue to try to help you out. Am I infringing on your right to free speech by preventing you to speak?
 
OK, as painful and slow as this process is becoming, I'll continue to try to help you out. Am I infringing on your right to free speech by preventing you to speak?

Of course not...not in my opinion or the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Again...so?
 
Of course not...not in my opinion or the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Again...so?

Your quote:

"allowing the reps to enjoy their private function rallies and their right of free speech without causing riots?"

The dems are not able to interfere with their right to free speech.
 
Back
Top