Clinton Foundation Toxic Legacy in Columbia

anatta

100% recycled karma
The Clinton Foundation’s philanthropic work in Colombia did more to promote a wealthy donor’s business interests than help the country’s poor residents escape poverty, a new investigative report claims.

The report by the Fusion network and the American Media Institute revealed that foundation projects in the South American country opened doors for Frank Giustra, a close pal of Bill Clinton and major donor to the Clinton Foundation, to buy property and open an oil business called Pacific Rubiales.

US agencies and global lending institutions pumped $100 million into Giustra’s Colombian ventures, thanks in large part to his ties to the Clinton Foundation, the report said.

But labor leaders charged that foundation programs “caused environmental harm, displaced indigenous people and . . . concentrated a larger share of Colombia’s oil and natural gas reserves in the hands of Giustra.”

“They are doing nothing for workers. I don’t even know what they are doing in this country other than exploiting poverty and extracting money,” one union official told Fusion.

Advocates for the poor charged that Pacific Rubiales used front groups to buy up blocks of land to get around laws barring a single ownership of more than 3,000 acres.

“This has created a grave situation and they took control of land that was intended for peasants, said Colombian Senator Jesus

Work and safety conditions were horrible, the report said.

A worker was killed and another badly injured when a cement wall fell on them at a 389-acre port development project called Puerto Bahia.

But instead of immediately taking the two workers to a nearly hospital, they were treated by paramedics in a tent at the facility.

“Pacific did not want the stain on their reputations from worker accidents,” Julio Carrascal of the Colombian oil workers’ union said. “They didn’t want the news to get out.”

Said Colombian Senator Jorge Robledo,
“The territory where Pacific Rubiales operated was a type of concentration camp for workers.”
While union leaders and human rights activists complained of abuses, Bill Clinton jetted in for a Pacific Rubiales golf tournament at the Bogota Country Club in February 2012. Accompanied by Giustra, he played a few holes with Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos.

The event raised $1 million for the Clinton Foundation, the report said.

Bill Clinton didn’t come here to play golf. Clinton opened doors for Giustra to do business here,” a Colombian senator said.

Giustra’s bustling oil company ended up going bankrupt.
http://nypost.com/2016/10/15/clinton-foundation-more-concerned-with-bills-pal-than-colombias-poor/
 
US agencies and global lending institutions pumped $100 million into Giustra’s Colombian ventures, thanks in large part to his ties to the Clinton Foundation, the report said.
so USAID pumps in money, to an exploitive Friend Of Bill (FOB) -leave the enviornment in ruins,
and then Bill Clinton fly in for some rounds of golf..which raised MORE money for the Foundation!!
 


The MURDOCH POST??!!!


LOL-face-012.jpg
 
The Clinton Foundation’s philanthropic work in Colombia did more to promote a wealthy donor’s business interests than help the country’s poor residents escape poverty, a new investigative report claims.

The report by the Fusion network and the American Media Institute revealed that foundation projects in the South American country opened doors for Frank Giustra, a close pal of Bill Clinton and major donor to the Clinton Foundation, to buy property and open an oil business called Pacific Rubiales.

US agencies and global lending institutions pumped $100 million into Giustra’s Colombian ventures, thanks in large part to his ties to the Clinton Foundation, the report said.

But labor leaders charged that foundation programs “caused environmental harm, displaced indigenous people and . . . concentrated a larger share of Colombia’s oil and natural gas reserves in the hands of Giustra.”

“They are doing nothing for workers. I don’t even know what they are doing in this country other than exploiting poverty and extracting money,” one union official told Fusion.

Advocates for the poor charged that Pacific Rubiales used front groups to buy up blocks of land to get around laws barring a single ownership of more than 3,000 acres.

“This has created a grave situation and they took control of land that was intended for peasants, said Colombian Senator Jesus

Work and safety conditions were horrible, the report said.

A worker was killed and another badly injured when a cement wall fell on them at a 389-acre port development project called Puerto Bahia.

But instead of immediately taking the two workers to a nearly hospital, they were treated by paramedics in a tent at the facility.

“Pacific did not want the stain on their reputations from worker accidents,” Julio Carrascal of the Colombian oil workers’ union said. “They didn’t want the news to get out.”

Said Colombian Senator Jorge Robledo,
While union leaders and human rights activists complained of abuses, Bill Clinton jetted in for a Pacific Rubiales golf tournament at the Bogota Country Club in February 2012. Accompanied by Giustra, he played a few holes with Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos.

The event raised $1 million for the Clinton Foundation, the report said.

Bill Clinton didn’t come here to play golf. Clinton opened doors for Giustra to do business here,” a Colombian senator said.

Giustra’s bustling oil company ended up going bankrupt.
http://nypost.com/2016/10/15/clinton-foundation-more-concerned-with-bills-pal-than-colombias-poor/

It wasn't AMI, a right wing source, AND Fusion. It was AMI THROUGH Fusion.

"AMI Attack On Clinton Foundation Published At Fusion. AMI partnered with Ken Silverstein to write a feature at Fusion concluding that the Clinton Foundation’s work “left a toxic legacy in Colombia.” AMI was identified in the article only as “a nonprofit news service.” Fusion later expressed “regret” in an editor’s note that said the piece did not meet the publications “standards”:

Editor’s note: The original version of this story did not meet our standards, and it has been revised accordingly. The update includes comments from the Clinton Foundation on its activities in Colombia. We regret that this information was not included at the time of original publication."

http://mediamatters.org/research/20...-running-its-right-wing-investigations/213932
 
It wasn't AMI, a right wing source, AND Fusion. It was AMI THROUGH Fusion.

"AMI Attack On Clinton Foundation Published At Fusion. AMI partnered with Ken Silverstein to write a feature at Fusion concluding that the Clinton Foundation’s work “left a toxic legacy in Colombia.” AMI was identified in the article only as “a nonprofit news service.” Fusion later expressed “regret” in an editor’s note that said the piece did not meet the publications “standards”:

Editor’s note: The original version of this story did not meet our standards, and it has been revised accordingly. The update includes comments from the Clinton Foundation on its activities in Colombia. We regret that this information was not included at the time of original publication."

http://mediamatters.org/research/20...-running-its-right-wing-investigations/213932
so what? I love you guys with the "sources" responses -how about knocking down the story itself??

AND YOU'RE USING MEDIA MATTERS?? Talk about a "biased source?":palm:

The only thing I see here is a question of parentage. what's substantially incorrect?

MI Attack On Clinton Foundation Published At Fusion. AMI partnered with Ken Silverstein to write a feature at Fusion concluding that the Clinton Foundation’s work “left a toxic legacy in Colombia.” AMI was identified in the article only as “a nonprofit news service.” Fusion later expressed “regret” in an editor’s note that said the piece did not meet the publications “standards”:
 
so what? I love you guys with the "sources" responses -how about knocking down the story itself??

AND YOU'RE USING MEDIA MATTERS?? Talk about a "biased source?":palm:

The only thing I see here is a question of parentage. what's substantially incorrect?

AMI gets funded by RW dark money. One of the main guys did some hit piece on Ibams that was loaded with lies. As you can see, Fusion stepped back from the article you cited.
 
AMI gets funded by RW dark money. One of the main guys did some hit piece on Ibams that was loaded with lies. As you can see, Fusion stepped back from the article you cited.

but is it disputed? it reads to me like the question is: AMI was identified in the article only as “a nonprofit news service.”
soooo.look for more sources/folow up:

Clinton Foundation attacks reporter in failed bid to kill critical story
Making their own claims of media bias, the Clinton Foundation has lashed out at the millennial news site Fusion for running a sharply critical investigative story about Bill Clinton's lackluster efforts in Colombia, charging that the reporter doesn't like the Clintons.

But in an unexpected rebuff, the website backed by pro-Clinton Univision and one that features Donald Trump critic Jorge Ramos as a columnist, refused to back down and kill the Monday story headlined, "The Clinton Foundation left a toxic legacy in Colombia."

In a letter to Fusion and Univision executives, provided to Secrets, the Foundation slapped reporter Ken Silverstein as anti-Clinton and demanded the story be pulled down.

"We're asking Fusion to remove this story, at least until your own editors have had a chance to fact check it, or make it clear that this is an opinion piece and provide us the opportunity to respond with our own opinion piece," wrote Craig Minassian of the Foundation.

The investigation into Clinton's dealings in Colombia was funded by the American Media Institute. It documented how the Foundation's promises to help small businesses and the poor fell far short.

It also detailed how Bill Clinton opened doors for a Foundation mega-donor in the country where he and Hillary Clinton knew many leaders.
The letter charged inaccuracies, but gave few examples. Instead, it criticized Silverstein and his social media hits on the Clintons and support for Trump in a bid to shame Fusion to back down.

As you may know, Ken Silverstein, the author of this story has a long, public record of anti-Clinton bias, vulgar tweets, unfounded attacks against the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton family that violate the most basic standards of unbiased journalism," wrote Minassian, who attacked some of the reporter's tweets.

For example, in recent Tweets (posted below) he encouraged his social media followers to "vote Trump," and identified himself as someone "who hates Hillary Clinton." We assume Fusion has a disclosure policy when published as "news" material by an author who has a very public bias against a candidate or organization they are writing about.

Neither Ken nor anyone else on behalf of Fusion reached out to us. While Silverstein has contacted us in the past, he has misled us about who about being on assignment. For example, the last time we heard from him was in early August of this year when he claimed he was writing a story about Columbia for POLITICO, which rejected it. Now, it seems that same story has appeared in Fusion without giving us the opportunity to respond. Also, the story suggests that he reached out to Secretary Clinton's office and the Clinton campaign, which, while we don't speak for them, doesn't appear to be accurate either but I encourage you to contact the campaign directly. This lack of fact checking is a concern particularly given the timing of the story.

I'm not sure if you've had a chance to read the story, but here's just one example of a totally erroneous, unsourced assertion presented as a fact: "Formally known as the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation, the family's nonprofit was formed in the early days of the Monica Lewinsky scandal. (Initially, it was going to pay for the president's legal defense as well as fund good works in a post-presidency, modelled on Jimmy Carter's sterling efforts.)"

There are many other erroneous parts of the story and conjecture presented as reported fact. Had a fact-checker from Fusion reached out, we would have been happy to provide facts about our work in Columbia. Therefore we're asking Fusion to remove this story, at least until your own editors have had a chance to fact check it, or make it clear that this is an opinion piece and provide us the opportunity to respond with our own opinion piece.

We have always valued our opportunities to work with Fusion and the role you play in journalism, which is why we are making you aware of this issue.

Thank you for considering our request and we would welcome a discussion about how to remedy this situation.

Craig Minassian
Chief Communications Officer Clinton Foundation
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/c...ed-bid-to-kill-critical-story/article/2604875
 
so where's the beef?
the "inaccuracies" look minor ( date of the Clinton Foundation founding/ where was Silverstein on a previous POLITICO assignment.
 
Anatta, you ask "but is it disputed?"

It's like lib radicals such as Barry & Hillary normally do...stay away from factual content and distract their enemies to focus on secondary issues. They are both well-versed and devotees of Saul Alinsky.

From Alinsky's Rules For Radicals.........

Rule#2
"Never go outside the expertise of your people." It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the "real" issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)

Rule#3
"Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy." Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.
(This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

***********************************************************

Another example of dodging the issue would be something like:

Reporter: So, Senator the email says that you killed a goat.

Senator Slimeball: That email was hacked by the Ruskies!!!!!!!!!
 
Another example of dodging the issue would be something like:

Reporter: So, Senator the email says that you killed a goat.

Senator Slimeball: That email was hacked by the Ruskies!!!!!!!!!
that seems to be the Clinton/Dems response to all the Wikileaks,yes Stretch.

Generally the Clintons use denial, disparage, delay and then "why are we still talking about this?"
 
Anatta, you ask "but is it disputed?"

It's like lib radicals such as Barry & Hillary normally do...stay away from factual content and distract their enemies to focus on secondary issues. They are both well-versed and devotees of Saul Alinsky.

From Alinsky's Rules For Radicals.........

Rule#2
"Never go outside the expertise of your people." It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the "real" issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)

Rule#3
"Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy." Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.
(This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

***********************************************************

Another example of dodging the issue would be something like:

Reporter: So, Senator the email says that you killed a goat.

Senator Slimeball: That email was hacked by the Ruskies!!!!!!!!!

Gee.....whatta tragedy!!!

The GREATEST Economy This Country Has EVER Experienced!!!!

The CLINTON YEARS!!!!!


Coming+Soon+-+Hillary+Clinton+in+the+Oval+Office+-+The+World+Of+Hillary+Clinton.JPG


CLINTON 3.0!!!!!!!


CWorKQvWwAAyRgq.png


youthewomangif.gif
.
youthewomangif.gif
.
youthewomangif.gif
 
Last edited:
AMI gets funded by RW dark money. One of the main guys did some hit piece on Ibams that was loaded with lies. As you can see, Fusion stepped back from the article you cited.

and the CGI gets funded by bribery and corruption......what's your point......
 
Back
Top