Podesta lamented that a Muslim, not a white man, named as killer in 2015 massacre

anatta

100% recycled karma
Top Hillary Clinton aides were upset a Muslim man was publicly named as the shooter in a 2015 massacre that left 14 people dead, and a longtime Clinton confidant even expressed regret that the terrorist wasn’t a white man, according to purported emails released by WikiLeaks on Sunday.

The emails were part of a trove of messages stolen from the gmail account of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, who has had a long association with the Democratic presidential nominee and her husband, former President Bill Clinton. The email chain began on Dec. 2, when digital operative Matt Ortega forwarded a tweet from MSNBC host Christopher Hayes that named one of the shooters in the San Bernardino, Calif., attack as Sayeed Farook. Consultant Karen Finney forwarded the email to Podesta, commenting, “Damn.”

Podesta responded:
“Better if a guy named Sayeed Farouk [sic] was reporting that a guy named Christopher Hayes was the shooter.”

n a 154-page debate prep book that was developed two months after the San Bernardino attacks, and also unearthed in the WikiLeaks document dump, topic 47 is devoted to “Should we call this Islamic terrorism?” Nowhere in the suggested seven-point answer does “Islamic terrorism” make an appearance. Instead, it’s suggested that Clinton call the enemy “radical jihadists.”

Point seven states:
“Radical jihadists underestimate us. We won’t turn on each other or turn on our principles. We will keep our country safe and strong, free and tolerant. And we will defeat those who threaten us.”

Obama held a lengthy press conference earlier this year to specifically address why he refused to link Islam and terrorism. But in the wake of the Orlando nightclub terror attack in June, and amid more Trump prodding, Clinton relented somewhat.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ite-man-named-as-killer-in-2015-massacre.html
 
^
why would anyone want it to not be a Muslim? what's the thought process here? I mean I cannot fathom any reason
to "damn" that in dissapointment
 
^
why would anyone want it to not be a Muslim? what's the thought process here? I mean I cannot fathom any reason
to "damn" that in dissapointment

I am 100% positive that is the first thought that went through the mind of EVERY JPP liberal starting with Thingy
 
Who cares, racist shithead? If Muslims disappear, you'd just find someone else to hate. You're evil, deplorable, and people like you will have no power under the coming presidency. If that I am thankful. The real America will have power, not the racists and traitors.
 
^
why would anyone want it to not be a Muslim? what's the thought process here? I mean I cannot fathom any reason
to "damn" that in dissapointment

They want it to not be a Muslim because their narrative is more important than protecting Americans; namely, that white conservatives [currently known as deplorables] are more dangerous than Muslims.

The proverbial 'angry white guy' is the lefts boogie man. A bit like unicorns lol.
 
They want it to not be a Muslim because their narrative is more important than protecting Americans; namely, that white conservatives [currently known as deplorables] are more dangerous than Muslims.

The proverbial 'angry white guy' is the lefts boogie man. A bit like unicorns lol.
good analysis.
They f*cking politize everything they touch, with their eternal attempts to narrate events.
 
They want it to not be a Muslim because their narrative is more important than protecting Americans; namely, that white conservatives [currently known as deplorables] are more dangerous than Muslims.

The proverbial 'angry white guy' is the lefts boogie man. A bit like unicorns lol.

Whites in America are more dangerous than Muslims in America.
 
Back
Top