We have always known the media is in the tank for democrats

Did I mention his name?

Zipperhead pummeled again fucking liar

Mention him by name?

Well, that's not what you asked earlier, but nice job moving those goalposts...ROFL!

You asked where in your OP did you say anything about Trump and I pointed out where you did.

Dim Bulb ILA caught lying yet again.
 


Media being in the tank for the Democrats isn't new...its was obvious for the last 20 years, the fact admitted to by numerous newspapers and tv personalities over the last

10 years and today its totally obvious to entire country that the media is colluding with the Clinton campaign openly.....

It was undeniable that even in the last debate the 'moderator' was actually debating Trump on Clintons behalf during the debate....and in the event you forgot, it happened during one of the debates in 2012.....

Scapegoating is blaming some unfairly about an issue.....there is nothing unfair about stating what is absolutely the truth about where the media stands in this election....so don't use a word you don't know the meaning of ....


MEDIA LOVEFEST...
UNIVISION chief urged Clinton to hit harder...
CNBC John Harwood Advises Campaign [And he was debate moderator?!]...
NYT Gave Hillary Veto Power On Quotes!
BOSTON GLOBE coordinated to max her 'presence' in paper...

ROFL!!

I point out how the media is NOT in the tank for Hillary...I even provide several examples...yet not a single dim bulb Rightie has the cojones to respond!
 
Mention him by name?

Well, that's not what you asked earlier, but nice job moving those goalposts...ROFL!

You asked where in your OP did you say anything about Trump and I pointed out where you did.

Dim Bulb ILA caught lying yet again.

Wrong again liar

But this is why you are afraid to debate me in APP. You know I would embarrass you and your daughter would ask me to be her daddy instead of you.
 
To anyone who has taken a dispassionate look at this race, the media bias is obvious. That said, the GOP rank and file have nobody to blame for the coming loss but themselves. In the primaries they selected the only candidate Hillary could beat. There is a potential bright spot, however. When she is the POTUS there's a pretty good chance she won't use predator drones domestically. Still, I'd hate to be Syrian or Iranian right now. The revolution she pushed in Syria and Libya is most likely coming to Iran next. Hopefully the Alzheimers or brain-cancer or cranial clots or whatever is wrong with her will kill her before she gets to greenlight Iranian air-strikes, but it's not too likely.
 
Wrong again liar

But this is why you are afraid to debate me in APP. You know I would embarrass you and your daughter would ask me to be her daddy instead of you.

ROFL!!

Chickenshit ILA too scared to debate out in the open.

No, he wants to run and hide in AP where nothing bad can hurt him!
 
ROFL!!

Chickenshit ILA too scared to debate out in the open.

No, he wants to run and hide in AP where nothing bad can hurt him!

Poor Zipperhead can't debate me 1:1 without back up from his little itty bitty liberal friends. Everyone knows your a pussy. That is why your daughter wants me to be her daddy instead of you
 
it's so incredibly obvious to anyone that isn't a useful idiot like christiefan et al

I am blown away with how much the media is blatantly propaganda at this point. Candidates aside it's disgusting and terrifying.
Oh brother. If the media is so biased how comes Trump has received about a billion dollars in free air time?
 
Oh brother. If the media is so biased how comes Trump has received about a billion dollars in free air time?

Free air time that's used to bash him. Please, Mott. You know damn well the media is stacked with people who hate Trump and are doing everything they can to help Hillary. Can you cite a single (non fox news) article that shows Trump in a positive way?
 
it's so incredibly obvious to anyone that isn't a useful idiot like christiefan et al

I am blown away with how much the media is blatantly propaganda at this point. Candidates aside it's disgusting and terrifying.

Regardless how this election turns out, the genie is out of the bottle. Trump has definitely done some things that haven't helped him and I am not talking about the "grabbing pussy" comment. I laugh at the arm chair quarterbacks who say "Oh, Kasich would be killing Hillary now". They are so full of shit.

It wouldn't matter who the nominee was they were always going to go after them. Trump obviously has a longer resume because unlike some he never conducted his life like he was running for office.

You need no more proof than what they did with Romney in 2012. Remember the "magic underpants"? He never paid taxes? His 11 car garage? His binder of women?

Please, the GOP needs to learn that they suck at winning. They nominate people that are content losing. People are tired of it. So we get Trump. It is as simple as they. People like Cawacko and Tinfoil can sit all high minded with their principles, but I don't see their principles getting advanced if they don't fucking win.
 
Free air time that's used to bash him. Please, Mott. You know damn well the media is stacked with people who hate Trump and are doing everything they can to help Hillary. Can you cite a single (non fox news) article that shows Trump in a positive way?


Are you going to go all Zipperhead on me and ignore the thread in APP?
 
Using leaked documents from Guccifer 2.0, The Daily Caller reports that campaign chairman Joel Benenson had cocktails with a number of reporters on April 10, 2015 on subjects including to “give reporters their first thoughts from team [Hillary Clinton] in advance of the announcement” and “framing the [Hillary Clinton] message and framing the race.” It was just two days later that Mrs. Clinton announced she was running for president.

The Daily Caller reports, describes Haberman’s many favors for the Clintons. “We have [had] a very good relationship with Maggie Haberman of Politico over the last year. We have had her tee up stories for us before and have never been disappointed,” states the memo.

Many more reporters rsvp’d for cocktails with the Hillary campaign, including reporters from ABC, Bloomberg, CBS, CNN, The Daily Beast, The Huffington Post, MSNBC, NBC, The New Yorker, The New York Times, People, Politico, Vice, and Vox. The diverse variety of attendees demonstrates just how widely and deeply the Hillary Clinton campaign has penetrated the mainstream media.

John Harwood sent the campaign an email with the subject line “good letter,” according to recently released WikiLeaks documents. He also wrote to Clinton loyalist John Podesta, “She looked so much more comfortable talking to [MSNBC’s] Andrea [Mitchell] today than to [CNN’s] Brianna [Keilar] a few weeks ago.”

Podesta responded that he thought Hillary was “over the hump. Knows she has to do this ad infinitum.” Harwood even reached out to ask Podesta, “How are you feeling about where things stand?”

The Daily Caller reports, describes Haberman’s many favors for the Clintons. “We have [had] a very good relationship with Maggie Haberman of Politico over the last year. We have had her tee up stories for us before and have never been disappointed,” states the memo.

In other words, Haberman was, and likely still is, a “go to” journalist for reliable pro-Hillary bias.

MSNBC’s Chris Hayes’ editorial producer Sheara Braun wrote in 2015 to a Clinton aide. Braun commented that MSNBC had been airing a Millennial-focused segment each night.
“The point of the segment is basically to inform young people about all of the crap and nonsense that Sec. Clinton and President Clinton (but mostly Sec. Clinton) had to face back in the 90s when President Clinton was running for office… everything from cookie-gate to stand-by-your-man-gate to Hillarycare,” Braun writes. “The point isn’t to dwell on the past but the point is to talk about this amazing, intelligent woman who probably faced more nonsense back in the day because she is a woman…and she continues to have to face it. She is smarter than most men and more qualified than most men to be president.

Of course Hillary Clinton’s die-hard loyalists in the media will dislike, and find invalid, any suggestion that she engaged in any sort of questionable conduct,” wrote Glenn Greenwald for The Intercept this September.
“Their self-assigned role is to defend her from all criticisms. They view themselves more as campaign operatives than journalists: Their principal, overriding goal is to ensure that Clinton wins the election.”

The New York Times argue that the so-called mainstream media have abandoned unbiased journalism in the face of a possible Trump presidency. Recent leaks by WikiLeaks, DC Leaks, and Guccifer 2.0 each demonstrate that the media haven’t abandoned their objectivity—they never had any in the first place.

These revelations follow closely behind another batch of WikiLeaks emails released just before the Democratic convention that provided other egregious examples of this corrupt alliance between the establishment, left-wing media and the Democrat Party, particularly the Clinton wing of the party. Whether fact-checking the candidates, or reporting on new political developments, it is clear that a pro-Hillary dogma permeates current press reporting.
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/the-corrupt-democrat-media-complex-seeks-clinton-victory/
 
Last edited:
Using leaked documents from Guccifer 2.0, The Daily Caller reports that campaign chairman Joel Benenson had cocktails with a number of reporters on April 10, 2015 on subjects including to “give reporters their first thoughts from team [Hillary Clinton] in advance of the announcement” and “framing the [Hillary Clinton] message and framing the race.” It was just two days later that Mrs. Clinton announced she was running for president.

The Daily Caller reports, describes Haberman’s many favors for the Clintons. “We have [had] a very good relationship with Maggie Haberman of Politico over the last year. We have had her tee up stories for us before and have never been disappointed,” states the memo.

Many more reporters rsvp’d for cocktails with the Hillary campaign, including reporters from ABC, Bloomberg, CBS, CNN, The Daily Beast, The Huffington Post, MSNBC, NBC, The New Yorker, The New York Times, People, Politico, Vice, and Vox. The diverse variety of attendees demonstrates just how widely and deeply the Hillary Clinton campaign has penetrated the mainstream media.

John Harwood sent the campaign an email with the subject line “good letter,” according to recently released WikiLeaks documents. He also wrote to Clinton loyalist John Podesta, “She looked so much more comfortable talking to [MSNBC’s] Andrea [Mitchell] today than to [CNN’s] Brianna [Keilar] a few weeks ago.”

Podesta responded that he thought Hillary was “over the hump. Knows she has to do this ad infinitum.” Harwood even reached out to ask Podesta, “How are you feeling about where things stand?”

The Daily Caller reports, describes Haberman’s many favors for the Clintons. “We have [had] a very good relationship with Maggie Haberman of Politico over the last year. We have had her tee up stories for us before and have never been disappointed,” states the memo.

In other words, Haberman was, and likely still is, a “go to” journalist for reliable pro-Hillary bias.

MSNBC’s Chris Hayes’ editorial producer Sheara Braun wrote in 2015 to a Clinton aide. Braun commented that MSNBC had been airing a Millennial-focused segment each night.

Of course Hillary Clinton’s die-hard loyalists in the media will dislike, and find invalid, any suggestion that she engaged in any sort of questionable conduct,” wrote Glenn Greenwald for The Intercept this September.

The New York Times argue that the so-called mainstream media have abandoned unbiased journalism in the face of a possible Trump presidency. Recent leaks by WikiLeaks, DC Leaks, and Guccifer 2.0 each demonstrate that the media haven’t abandoned their objectivity—they never had any in the first place.

These revelations follow closely behind another batch of WikiLeaks emails released just before the Democratic convention that provided other egregious examples of this corrupt alliance between the establishment, left-wing media and the Democrat Party, particularly the Clinton wing of the party. Whether fact-checking the candidates, or reporting on new political developments, it is clear that a pro-Hillary dogma permeates current press reporting.
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/the-corrupt-democrat-media-complex-seeks-clinton-victory/

AIM. They were the ones that claimed Vince Foster was murdered by the Clintons.
 
AIM. They were the ones that claimed Vince Foster was murdered by the Clintons.
shooting the messenger doesn't invalidate the message.
I picked this article because of the specific references to the specific media personalities. If you disagree with any of the content - please post.
 
Politico co-founder Jim VandeHei said that while he has always been a defender of the media and thought that accusations of media bias were overdone, that’s out the door in this campaign.

“I think reporters have become so biased, so partisan, particularly on Twitter,” VandeHei said. “Go look at the Twitter feeds of the reporters from your major newspapers—The New York Times, The Washington Post, others and tell me if those are things that they would say on TV or that would ever have been acceptable in previous campaigns.”

Scarborough turned to Willie Geist and said that when he reads The New York Times he doesn’t want to have opinions in the lede or see reporters doing an “end zone dance.”

Geist replied that at some point during the presidential race, a decision was made by many members of the media that Trump had to be stopped no matter what.


VandeHei chimed back in saying that the reporters aren’t saying things in their tweets that we didn’t already know, and that “They are not helping it by doing not just an end-zone dance but their little shimmy, and they all slap each other on the back [saying], ‘Ha ha, you’re even wittier than I was.’”

Mike Barnicle—a card carrying member of the liberal media—said that he was surprised that in age where maybe 99% of the people in this country think the media tilts left and is biased, that more editors, and publishers, don’t tell reporters to stay off Twitter because “all you do on Twitter is get yourself in trouble and raise these questions.”

Geist added that he thought the media should be “tough as hell” on both Clinton and Trump, but be fair about it.

“I think objectivity is a totally false premise–people are humans; they come with their biases but your job is to just cover the race fairly,” Geist said. “I don’t want to hear what you think about it on Twitter, if you’re a reporter. [if you’re in the] Opinion business, go for it.”

Scarborough said that when reporters “overshoot the runway,” they feed into Trump and his supporters, who believe that the media are biased and are never going to give him a fair shake.

As shocking as it is to hear liberals criticize the liberal media for going overboard on their anti-Trump bias on Twitter, it won’t have any material effect as most members of the media know that in the current environment there are few, if any, repercussions for their behavior.
 
Back
Top