Should we prosecute Hillary?

Jarod said:
I can see the plan now, they are going to do to her what they did to Bill Clinton, spend 8 years trying to get her on something, spending billions on "investigations".
Click to expand...

I support an investigation on whether or not private email servers make it harder for FOIA to function :)
 
evince said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dismissal_of_U.S._attorneys_controversy



bush sure did




On December 7, 2006, the George W. Bush administration's Department of Justice ordered the unprecedented[1] midterm dismissal of seven United States Attorneys. Congressional investigations focused on whether the Department of Justice and the White House were using the U.S. Attorney positions for political advantage. Allegations were that some of the attorneys were targeted for dismissal to impede investigations of Republican politicians or that some were targeted for their failure to initiate investigations that would damage Democratic politicians or hamper Democratic-leaning voters.[2][3] The U.S. attorneys were replaced with interim appointees, under provisions in the 2005 USA PATRIOT Act reauthorization.[4][5][6] [7][8]
A subsequent report by the Justice Department Inspector General in October 2008 found that the process used to fire the first seven attorneys and two others dismissed around the same time was "arbitrary", "fundamentally flawed", and "raised doubts about the integrity of Department prosecution decisions".[9] In July 2010, the Department of Justice prosecutors closed the two-year investigation without filing charges after determining that the firing was inappropriately political, but not criminal, saying "Evidence did not demonstrate that any prosecutable criminal offense was committed with regard to the removal of David Iglesias. The investigative team also determined that the evidence did not warrant expanding the scope of the investigation beyond the removal of Iglesias."[10]
Click to expand...

well
 
tsuke said:
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-10-10/trump-would-jail-clinton-there-s-a-name-for-that

" What separates functioning democracies from weak or failed ones is that political parties alternate in power without jailing the opponents they beat in elections. That sometimes means giving a pass to potentially criminal conduct, but that’s a worthwhile sacrifice for making republican government work."

This is a very interesting quote I want to discuss with everyone. Basically it says that no matter what your predecessor does in office you are not supposed to bring suit to it as it threatens our republic. What does everyone think?
Click to expand...

Of course all the "political thugs" should be prosecuted to the full extent of Constitutional Law. The Democrat party has a long documented history of being thugs just like other syndicated crime families...the only difference the democrats run the big con on THE PEOPLE...and attempt to rewrite history and blame all their historically recorded acts on their political opponents.

Ranging from being the root cause of US SLAVERY....to JIM CROW LAWS....to taking Indian lands through violence and treaty breeches....but the big lie is that somehow...the Conservatives now found in the south were once DEMOCRATS but changed parties....while in truth, less than a 1% turnover since the founding founding of this nation has any democrat representative changing parties. The south is mostly populated by conservatives due to the recent economic trend of all the major manufacturing and employment opportunities having moved from the north to the south and this is recent history...as that transition has occurred only from the late 60s and early 70s to date.

But...the big con is that now the majority of southern democrats are now republican....the only thing true that comes from the democrat propaganda is they have somehow convinced the minorities they are a party of the black people....that transition most certainly has happened...but it happened under FDR's NEW DEAL that excluded BLACKS...unless they supported the NEW COMMUNIST DEAL...it was either vote democrat/communist or not get any of the federal aid the whites were going to get.

I defy anyone to present any documented history where the democrat party supported any kind of CIVIL RIGHTS LEGISLATION for blacks and other minorities such as the Native American....prior the racist con from LBJ who needed the black vote in the 60s to gain political power as the black voters outnumbered the white voters in Texas.

Anyone....disprove it was not the democrat parties congress and president that signed JIM CROW into law....it was not the democrat party that started and supported the KKK...especially bigots like Woodrow Wilson who signed the Jim Crow laws into existence. Disprove it was not the Democrats in Congress that refused 100% to vote for the first Civil Rights acts of legislation....like the one in the 1860s or the amendments giving Blacks the right to vote....anyone Prove that it was not the conservatives in congress that voted almost 100% to pass the civil rights acts of the 60s while the democrats boycotted such time and time again.

The Big Lie......constitutional conservatives are an enemy of Civil rights...The Record Stands for itself. If you are gullible enough to believe that the modern democrat party has seen the evil of their ways with sudden clarity in the 60s and suddenly decided to move north..... I shall leave you alone....because you are so stupid that you can't reason for yourself thus making anything you do...MOOT. The only democrats moving north are still democrats...the Black Minority that now finds itself stranded in the lower rungs of societies while confined by democrat legislation to the the inner city slums that now serve as the new Democrat Plantations. The Big Lie bought by the Blacks...you are to stupid and to lazy to take care of yourself the way whites do....vote for us and we shall purchase your votes through housing (now slums)....food stamps...ect. But the reality is the Blacks now find themselves democrats while targeted by the civil authorities far more than any other race of peoples.....unemployed far more than any other group of American Citizens....more poor than any other group...even the Native Americans.

Indeed....welcome to the new democrat plantation..and they use you today just like they did in the 18 and 19 hundreds....only now they keep you at bay by making it impossible to leave the slums and crime pits they have made for you. Any independent Black person that makes good and does not vote the party line is quickly called an Uncle Tom...and in many cases subject to selective prosecution by the Thugs in power.
 
Last edited:
anatta said:
oh lord...it was never Bengazi..Libya 2011 is the disease -Bengazi but a symptom
Click to expand...

TBH im more annoyed about the emails violating FOIA than about benghazi. I can grudgingly accept that she needed to sacrifice the 4 guys for geopolitical reasons.
 
Gotta take issue with your liberal use of the word democrat party here, along with the omission of the GOP. Fact is both parties have engaged in rampant and blatant criminality for probably fifty years, and every president just gets worse. Hillary is somewhat exceptional in that it will take her many years as president to accumulate as much criminal conduct as she accumulated as Secretary of State, but she'll get her chance. Certainly I expect some political retaliation, a lot of illegal military adventures, phone tapping, prosecutions of political opponents, etc etc.
 
ghostdogtxn said:
Gotta take issue with your liberal use of the word democrat party here, along with the omission of the GOP. Fact is both parties have engaged in rampant and blatant criminality for probably fifty years, and every president just gets worse. Hillary is somewhat exceptional in that it will take her many years as president to accumulate as much criminal conduct as she accumulated as Secretary of State, but she'll get her chance. Certainly I expect some political retaliation, a lot of illegal military adventures, phone tapping, prosecutions of political opponents, etc etc.
Click to expand...

50 years? The thuggery started when the Democrat Republican party separated forming the democrat and republican parties...one of the first criminals was Andy Jackson who used his political machine to steal every and anything he wanted...the most egregious was the murder and theft of the lands of peaceful friendly Native Americans. Talk about "torture"...ever hear of the trail of tears and the Indian Removal Act of the 1830? Almost 100% of the constitutional conservatives voted against such inhumane acts with every democrat voting for it, just like the JIM CROW legislation signed into law by another thug Woodrow Wilson, and another FDR who threatened to exclude all Blacks from his NEW DEAL relief programs if they did not vote democrat...as I said, the DEMOCRAT PARTY has a long and documented history backing slavery....to include many northern democrat representatives such as Douglas..etc.....to attacking other representatives on the floors of congress because they opposed such inhumane acts as the Indian Removal Act...and the Jim Crow laws..etc.,

One of the biggest democrat thugs in history...i.e...a community organizer by the name of Daily..who corrupted the civil services and workers unions.. for decades in Chicago...not to mention another community organizer..i.e., thief and thug by the name of Alinsky who advised the mob on how to save money on contract killings in Chicago...one of the modern democrat parties HEROES...as documented publicly on NBC....

 
Jarod said:
If it's perjury, charge her... don't wait. The people should know before the election. The Republicans won't have a majority after the election.
Click to expand...

I started a thread about it....the consensus was you couldn't impeach someone until after the inauguration.......if the people don't know already its their own fault for listening to idiot Democrats.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top