Paul Ryan five thirty eight

Bill said:
I totally disagree. Our process & us will be the winners because that old illusion of corp money being the only way has been broken...... Thanks to Bernie & the dirty.......
Click to expand...
Trump pulled record small donors too. But look who wins -Big Money is untouchable
 
Jarod said:
They don't show collusion with the press corp, silly!
Click to expand...

biglaugh7_zpsd701e485.gif
 
Bill said:
Yes, & I gave him honorable mention, albeit begrudgingly......lol..

IMHO this a real game changer going forward
Click to expand...
I don't think it is. wehatever you think of Trump and Bernie their enthusiastic followers would walk over hot coals for them..

Suppose this was Hillary and say...that Maryland gov. Martin O'Malley, and no Trump for the Republicans.
Do you think small donors would still shell out?

I mean I hope you are correct, but it think this is more a phenomena then a trend line.
 
Jarod said:
A man who called people losers,
Click to expand...

Lie #1; you're on a roll. But calling someone a loser sure as hell beats calling half the population deplorable.

Jarod said:
attacked Gold Star mothers,
Click to expand...

Lie #2; still rolling. But you also conveniently forgot that these maggots were the first one's to sling mud. I know, in liberal loony land where you reside it's perfectly okay for Dems to sling mud; Republicans should just take it. Moron.

Jarod said:
handicapped reporters and Judges
Click to expand...

Lie #3 and #4; rolling rolling rolling.

Jarod said:
with Mexican heritage
Click to expand...

Lie #5; and you're still not done.

Jarod said:
Pussygate would not have been as big a deal if it did not otherwise fit in with much of his personality.
Click to expand...

Lie #6; pussygate would not be an issue if Trump were a Democrat; after all, you morons defended sexual predator BillyBob Clinton to the end and made him a party legend and hero; along with his corrupt sociopathic lying wife.

Jarod said:
It would have been a scandal, but the apology would have been much more believable.
Click to expand...

There is no "scandal"; only the fake outrage form the leftist media desperate to drag a corrupt lying sociopath across the finish line. Apologizing is only acceptable to brain dead clueless liberals when it is one of their own.

Jarod said:
That is why Bill Clinton's Lewinski scandal did not take him down, he was otherwise likeable and people wanted to believe his apology.

Lie #7; the only reason BillyBob Clinton survived was because he was a Democrat and democrats don't give a shit about corrupt, lying, despicable sexual predators as long as they have that "D" next to their name.

Jarod said:
Bill Clinton had otherwise treated women with respect and dignity.
Click to expand...

Lie #8:

biglaugh7_zpsd701e485.gif
Click to expand...
 
anatta said:
I don't think it is. wehatever you think of Trump and Bernie their enthusiastic followers would walk over hot coals for them..

Suppose this was Hillary and say...that Maryland gov. Martin O'Malley, and no Trump for the Republicans.
Do you think small donors would still shell out?

I mean I hope you are correct, but it think this is more a phenomena then a trend line.
Click to expand...

No I don't & because they have not asked/made a push for it...

Those coming after will have precedent for doing so.....

Cutting off citizens united, not @ the knees but @ the root would help get this country back on track, out of their hands & into the hands of the ppl.......
 
Bill said:
No I don't & because they have not asked/made a push for it...

Those coming after will have precedent for doing so.....

Cutting off citizens united, not @ the knees but @ the root would help get this country back on track, out of their hands & into the hands of the ppl.......
Click to expand...
curious as to how SCOTUS gets rid of CU?
It's like the default position -it's not the first time Congressional campaign limits have been found infringing on political speech
 
anatta said:
curious as to how SCOTUS gets rid of CU?
It's like the default position -it's not the first time Congressional campaign limits have been found infringing on political speech
Click to expand...

No, it does not do that, it does not need to, although I hope that betrayal is reversed........

IMHO- if most, if not almost all the money comes from the ppl that corp money~influence will be reduced & hopefully almost diminished over a few election cycles..

I am trying to be optimistic here, gimmie a break.....lol
 
i think the gop will regret doing this and it will cause them to lose the senate and the house. Trump voters are very enthusiastic.
 
tsuke said:
i think the gop will regret doing this and it will cause them to lose the senate and the house. Trump voters are very enthusiastic.
Click to expand...

True, they are, but does that mean the party should support trumpf if they believe he is damaging the brand & is gonna lose anyway?? :dunno:
 
Bill said:
I totally disagree. Our process & us will be the winners because that old illusion of corp money being the only way has been broken...... Thanks to Bernie & the dirty.......
Click to expand...

not really if clinton wins then corporate money would have triumphed over bernie and trump. In fact she didnt even need to pick a olive branch VP like pence for the other side of the party.
 
Bill said:
No, it does not do that, it does not need to, although I hope that betrayal is reversed........

IMHO- if most, if not almost all the money comes from the ppl that corp money~influence will be reduced & hopefully almost diminished over a few election cycles..

I am trying to be optimistic here, gimmie a break.....lol
Click to expand...
ROFL!! no optimism allowed when it comes to Big Money Donors!! :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top