Kasich would be beating Hillary by over 5%

Thing1 said:
He'd be a runaway favorite right now.

I mean, Trump hasn't even run a campaign. In these final crucial weeks, he spent last week talking about Miss Universe, and this week is all about misogyny.

Such a shame. And it's ridiculous that righties thought he was "too moderate." Kasich is a very conservative candidate; SCOTUS would have been conservative for decades.

Now, you've got this. Was it worth it? Was it worth "sticking it to the media elites"?
Click to expand...



and pro Iraq war
 
cawacko said:
Not sure what gives that impression. I can't stand the woman
Click to expand...

Well let me ask you this then. If you were in a swing state, what would you do?

I get you are in Commiefornia and you have this luxury of being holier than thou.

But what if you weren't in a state where the outcome is preordained?
 
Crooked ILLary said:
Well let me ask you this then. If you were in a swing state, what would you do?

I get you are in Commiefornia and you have this luxury of being holier than thou.

But what if you weren't in a state where the outcome is preordained?
Click to expand...

I don't think being against a democrat masquerading as a Republican is holier than thou. Trump is doing long term damage to the GOP. I would not vote for him in any state.

I believe you said you didn't vote for McCain or Romney which is totally your right. Does that make you any more or less holier than thou than me?
 
Thing1 said:
Yeah, sure - because I absolutely live to take tests for posters who are incredible hypocrites & spend months talking about how they're not voting for Trump, then say they're voting for Trump.

I'll give you the one biggest reason: Hillary voted for Iraq. I have spent a lot of time on this board on that one, and I don't really care if that isn't good enough for you. I ain't voting for her.

And I would have voted for Kasich. My favorite candidate on either side from the beginning (and the most qualified).
Click to expand...

post 15
 
evince said:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/16/politics/john-kasich-iraq-war-2002/index.html




John Kasich says now that he never would have taken the United States to war in Iraq -- but the Ohio governor supported then-President George W. Bush's push for war in 2002.
In an interview with CNN's Dana Bash on "State of the Union" aired Sunday, Kasich said, "I would never have committed ourselves to Iraq."

But in November 2002, Kasich, then a former congressman, made a very different argument during an event at The Ohio State University, as the United States was gearing up for war in Iraq.
"We should go to war with Iraq. It's not likely that (Saddam) Hussein will give up his weapons. If he did he would be disgraced in the Arab world," he said then.
Kasich's 2002 comments, in front of a crowd of 100 students at the Kuhn Honors and Scholars House, were reported at the time by The Lantern, Ohio State's student newspaper, under the headline: "Fireside speaker favors war with Iraq."
Click to expand...

post 63


you tried real hard not to answer that question huh
 
Thing1 said:
Yeah, sure - because I absolutely live to take tests for posters who are incredible hypocrites & spend months talking about how they're not voting for Trump, then say they're voting for Trump.

I'll give you the one biggest reason: Hillary voted for Iraq. I have spent a lot of time on this board on that one, and I don't really care if that isn't good enough for you. I ain't voting for her.

And I would have voted for Kasich. My favorite candidate on either side from the beginning (and the most qualified).
Click to expand...

its implied here huh
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top