More Deplorable Oinker tapes surface with crude sex remarks

christiefan915

Catalyst
Contributor
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, already under siege for vulgar comments about forcing women into sex, also had crude, sexually explicit conversations in a series of radio interviews over the past 23 years, even noting how “voluptuous” his daughter was.

On a new batch of recordings from Howard Stern’s radio shows aired Saturday by CNN, Trump said he would “have no problem” having sex with 24-year-olds, that he “couldn’t care less” if he satisfies the women he sleeps with, that “it’s checkout time” once women reach the age of 35 and that he had engaged in three-way sex.

“Haven’t we all?” Trump told Stern on his SiriusXM satellite show in 2008. “Are we babies?”

Trump also described barging in on nude Miss Universe beauty pageant contestants in their dressing room, characterizing his visits as inspections by the contest’s owner.

In previously reported tapes of Stern programs from the 1990s through this decade, Trump bantered with the host of the popular radio raunchfest about whether he could have “nailed” Princess Diana, whether he would stay with his wife if she were disfigured in a car crash (“How do the breasts look?” Trump asked) and how often he had sex with his wife, Melania.

In the new collection of recordings, Trump and Stern trade observations about the nominee’s older daughter, Ivanka. On one show 10 years ago, Stern asked if Ivanka has breast implants, and her father said she does not. “She’s actually always been very voluptuous,” Trump added. Ivanka was 24 at the time.

Stern seemed especially interested in the age of the women Trump would sleep with. In an interview in 2002, when Melania was 30, Trump called 30 “a perfect age.” How about when a woman gets a bit older, one of Stern’s co-hosts asked.

“What is it at 35, Howard?” Trump replied. “It’s called checkout time.” Guffaws ensued all around.

In one of their conversations about Trump’s daughter, Stern complimented Ivanka’s looks and asked, “Can I say this? A piece of a--.”

“Yeah,” Trump responded.

e32c8aec-142e-488a-b2ef-ffc226d56a72-400.jpg


http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...-with-crude-sex-remarks/ar-BBxbcus?li=BBnb7Kz
 
Last edited:
But it won't!!!

As sad as that may sound.........

They are prepared to rationalize anything, & I do mean anything this disgusting POS has done, or will do..

Certainly that is preferable to admitting you were wrong for supporting a monster like this.....

& to think, those are the ones that considered themselves & their party the principled~WTF??
 
He'll point at his scotus choices with his pussy grabbing fingers, that's why they'll keep voting for him, or something. Like seriously, I keep hearing the scotus appointments as an excuse, but do you honestly believe Trump would know who to pick, that he wouldn't just fuck up like he does every chance he's given?
 
Good lord. I know this is a political board but this obsession with Trump and Clinton as if nothing else matters is a sickness. It's bad if you are voting for either of them so the literally hundreds of posts about the two have entered the pathetic rhelm. No one on this board is changing their mind and no one is on "higher" moral ground voting for either candidate.

Seriously, this is sad (and yes I'm ripping on myself)
 
Good lord. I know this is a political board but this obsession with Trump and Clinton as if nothing else matters is a sickness. It's bad if you are voting for either of them so the literally hundreds of posts about the two have entered the pathetic rhelm. No one on this board is changing their mind and no one is on "higher" moral ground voting for either candidate.

Seriously, this is sad (and yes I'm ripping on myself)

Pretty much what we see every presidential election cycle is it not??

This time there is more dirt & mud than usual, but pretty much as expected w/ two ppl w/ the highest negatives of all time.............. :dunno:
 
Good lord. I know this is a political board but this obsession with Trump and Clinton as if nothing else matters is a sickness. It's bad if you are voting for either of them so the literally hundreds of posts about the two have entered the pathetic rhelm. No one on this board is changing their mind and no one is on "higher" moral ground voting for either candidate.

Seriously, this is sad (and yes I'm ripping on myself)

I remember it was pretty much the same in 2012 here, and in 2008 on the AOL boards.
 
Back
Top