"Total disaster" in 95% black Haiti after Matthew hits. White people to the rescue.

Text Drivers are Killers said:
Yes it is because they're black. How do you explain that africa is by far the poorest and most backward continent on the planet?
Click to expand...

You can't extrapolate current economic conditions in a region into some inherent inferiority or superiority of the civilization in question. 1000 years ago Islamic civilization was the most advanced on the Earth, and Europeans were living in mud huts. 50 years ago Chinese were starving to death and were just as poor as the Africans. It wasn't due to inherent inferiority or superiority. All civilizations have their ups and their downs.
 
Seahawk said:
That is the most bullshit and racist statement I've read in a while.

If a people have been subjugated to slavery for hundreds of years, you expect them to have the same parity as the masters? Especially a tiny island like Haiti.
Click to expand...

The prosperity of a region, historically, is linked to how good their land is (for exploitation by agriculture) and how cut off they are from the rest of humanity (so that knowledge exchange can't happen). So most of the greatest empires in history sprung up in a line stretching from China to the middle east to europe. Sub-saharan africa was in the position of having really terrible land and being cut off from the rest of humanity by the sahara. That's why it's traditionally been so backwards.
 
Southerners like to blame their black population for their backwardness, but Maryland is 30% black, fourth highest black population in the nation, and you don't see it at the bottom of every list, do you?
 
What is Aleppo? said:
The prosperity of a region, historically, is linked to how good their land is (for exploitation by agriculture) and how cut off they are from the rest of humanity (so that knowledge exchange can't happen). So most of the greatest empires in history sprung up in a line stretching from China to the middle east to europe. Sub-saharan africa was in the position of having really terrible land and being cut off from the rest of humanity by the sahara. That's why it's traditionally been so backwards.
Click to expand...

the africans did have a great empire in the line you mentioned. It was called carthage. THey were destroyed because they were too weak to compete.
 
tsuke said:
i would actually say it is the fault of the people in the country that they got colonized and the results they got from it. For this argument I always point to Japan. After centuries under the tokugawa they faced the same situation facing down a technologically advanced expansionist empire who wanted to make them a colony. They played along for a couple of years learned everything they could and less than a century later became the first non western to beat a western one.

Nations will always do things for their self interest. If you fail to react properly then you are penalized for it.
Click to expand...



all your ancestors sucked sheep balls for a living because they loved it
 
tsuke said:
the africans did have a great empire in the line you mentioned. It was called carthage. THey were destroyed because they were too weak to compete.
Click to expand...

Carthage was north africa. That's different, they're above the sahara so they weren't cut off. They also do actually have a few good agricultural regions there (Tunisia and Egypt were both breadbaskets for Rome). Plenty of powerful civilizations have emerged from north africa, or had north africa as part of their domain.

Now, there were a few powerful sub-saharan empires, but they aren't as great as the ones in the line from China to Europe. They also never really had control over much of africa, the vast majority of africa wasn't organized into large political entities until imperialistic time.
 
Carthage was destroyed because they didn't have the manpower advantage of Rome. Same reason the Greeks were destroyed and absorbed into Rome as well.
 
What is Aleppo? said:
Carthage was north africa. That's different, they're above the sahara so they weren't cut off. They also do actually have a few good agricultural regions there (Tunisia and Egypt were both breadbaskets for Rome). Plenty of powerful civilizations have emerged from north africa, or had north africa as part of their domain.

Now, there were a few powerful sub-saharan empires, but they aren't as great as the ones in the line from China to Europe. They also never really had control over much of africa, the vast majority of africa wasn't organized into large political entities until imperialistic time.
Click to expand...

whether it was in the sahara or in the north it was still the great african shot at being the dominant worldwide civilization. Thy failed because they could not compete with the others in the prime time area.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
So why don't you give us a non-racial explanation for why africa is the poorest and most backward continent on the planet.?
Click to expand...

Well, it's not even a good question because ancient Egypt was in Africa and they had a pretty remarkable civilization.

There isn't any racial reason why Africa is *currently* mostly 3rd world. Though for reasons nobody seems to know, some cultures advance and some don't. But culture isn't race. Race is an artificial construct that's biologically useless.

For example, native Americans inhabited this continent for many centuries yet they never so much as invented the wheel. Yet, if one could magically transport an ancient Native American infant into the present time, place him/her in a good school and healthy home environment, there's every *scientifc* reason to assume they would be indistinguishable from their peers twenty years later.

Hell, they may even up with a Ph.D some day.

Same holds with currently extant black Africans. Culture, not race, is the determining factor.

As an aside, humans are kind of remarkable that way. Given evolutionary assumptions, some of what you say should be true, but it's not. Typically, when populations of a given species are isolated they tend to become biologically distinct from other populations---they can form sub-species or even separate species over time.

But humans seem resistant to that. We are all 99.9% the same.
 
Stelakh said:
Dear god, you really are the most despicable kind of person that could ever exist. And it's not the American media saying we are racist. You say that YOU are racist in just about every post you make here.

As much as you like to think we live in a 'white world,' there are places where whites are a minority.

Haiti is one such place - the population is 95% black.

It's also the poorest country in the western hemisphere.

And it's not because they're black.

Between the colonial occupations over the years - INCLUDING our own occupation of Haiti from 1915 to 1934, our domination over the area after World War II, the labor systems of the Republic when it was founded, corruption in the government that works to keep the poor poor, the population, illiteracy, erosion of available land, a large population in a small country, and on and on and on - the people of Haiti live in constant misery caused by prolonged economic disaster.

About 75% of the population of Haiti live on $2.00 a day from WORKING.

And it's not the fault of the average Haitian citizen.

But you, you disgusting PIG, you sit and judge them as if you are some great boon to mankind when you are nothing but an uneducated, creep-fest of hatred and racism.

People like you absolutely DISGUST me, and the fact that we as humans share the same general genetic makeup turns my stomach.

Am I being harsher than normal, here? Yes. But you are filth and deserve to be treated as such.

On the way to the office tomorrow I think I'll text while driving, just for you.
Click to expand...
He is the poster child for basketful of deplorables!
 
What is Aleppo? said:
You can't extrapolate current economic conditions in a region into some inherent inferiority or superiority of the civilization in question. 1000 years ago Islamic civilization was the most advanced on the Earth, and Europeans were living in mud huts. 50 years ago Chinese were starving to death and were just as poor as the Africans. It wasn't due to inherent inferiority or superiority. All civilizations have their ups and their downs.
Click to expand...

Just how ignorant are you. ? 1000 years ago europeans were building cathedrals and castles many of which still stand. But black africa has never produced anything. They have no accomplishments now or in the past. THINK, white-hater.
 
tsuke said:
the africans did have a great empire in the line you mentioned. It was called carthage. THey were destroyed because they were too weak to compete.
Click to expand...

Get serious. When people speak of african backwardness they mean sub-saharan africa. Were carthaginians even black.? Does anyone know.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Just how ignorant are you. ? 1000 years ago europeans were building cathedrals and castles many of which still stand. But black africa has never produced anything. They have no accomplishments now or in the past. THINK, white-hater.
Click to expand...

Well, weren't the early native Americans 'white'? Why didn't their culture advance?
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Get serious. When people speak of african backwardness they mean sub-saharan africa. Were carthaginians even black.? Does anyone know.
Click to expand...

When your ancestors still lived in caves (not that there is anything wrong w/ that):
main_1200.jpg

main_1200.jpg


 
RanaTARD said:
You're still an idiot on this matter BLM once again is police shootings and brutality, like Susan Komen's is breast cancer. It doesn't mean the people who support breast cancer don't care about other cancer, it just means their funds and focus go towards breast cancer. And how do you know some members won't give charitably to Haiti. Quit being a dumb ass. You are smarter than this stupidity.
Click to expand...

I am sure BLM would be shocked to find this out. What is not shocking is you erupting with complete and utter stupidity like a retard.
 
What is Aleppo? said:
You can't extrapolate current economic conditions in a region into some inherent inferiority or superiority of the civilization in question. 1000 years ago Islamic civilization was the most advanced on the Earth, and Europeans were living in mud huts. 50 years ago Chinese were starving to death and were just as poor as the Africans. It wasn't due to inherent inferiority or superiority. All civilizations have their ups and their downs.
Click to expand...

biglaugh7_zpsd701e485.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top