Trump’s farcical outreach to black voters is just white supremacy in disguise

christiefan915

Catalyst
Contributor
Donald Trump’s “outreach” to black voters is a farce. Luckily, the mainstream media is beginning to clue into the fact that when Trump speaks about black people, the message is about reassuring his white supporters that they aren’t really racist, more than trying to win over black voters.

“We’re going to rebuild our inner cities because our African-American communities are absolutely in the worst shape they’ve ever been in before. Ever, ever, ever,” Trump told the crowd in Kenansville.

“You take a look at the inner cities, you get no education, you get no jobs, you get shot walking down the street. They’re worse, I mean honestly, places like Afghanistan are safer than some of our inner cities,” he continued, adding the claim that his numbers with African-American voters are “going, like, high.” It hardly bears mentioning that every word of that is a lie.

Trump supporters are primarily motived by a desire to reassert white male dominance over the culture. So why does Trump even bother with this feigned concern for the well-being of black people? What he’s really pushing is an old and ugly narrative: Black people are incapable of handling responsibility and therefore need white people to control them. You know, for their own good.

It’s critical to remember the context of this speech, both in that we have a black president and that Trump and his supporters are obsessively angry about having a black president. By suggesting that black people’s fortunes have declined under President Obama, Trump is invoking a paternalistic narrative. The black president elected by a diverse coalition couldn’t help black people, he’s suggesting. Therefore, it’s time to restore nearly exclusive white male control over government.

...Trump’s underlying narrative is: White people should be allowed rights and power, but not black people, because, in Trump’s view, they can’t handle the responsibility.


http://www.salon.com/2016/09/25/tru...k-voters-is-just-white-supremacy-in-disguise/
 
This is a white woman writing this?

Yes, Amanda Marcotte. She worked feminism into the article too.

"As a feminist writer, I’ve frequently encountered a similar narrative coming from anti-feminists. The right-wing press is forever publishing articles arguing that feminism has made women unhappy, and that we were all so much happier when we didn’t have to deal with the stresses of equality with men.

In other words, it’s an argument in favor of female inferiority. No one disputes the idea that men are capable of “having it all” — that men can handle the responsibilities of a job and a family — but women are viewed as too delicate to put up with the scary world outside the white picket fence.

It’s the same narrative that Trump is using on black people: OK, we tried it your way and let you have some equality — and look where that got you! Now it’s time to return to a system where you are subservient."
 
That last paragraph, what is she talking about? So Democratic policies are all about equality and free market republican policies are about white supremacy? So we have another feminist calling capitalism racist essentially. Lovely.
 
That last paragraph, what is she talking about? So Democratic policies are all about equality and free market republican policies are about white supremacy? So we have another feminist calling capitalism racist essentially. Lovely.

I think you're reading too much into it. Surely Trump supporters (and I'm not including you) know their guy doesn't come across well to blacks. Look at his lie: "our African-American communities are absolutely in the worst shape they’ve ever been in before. Ever, ever, ever..."

It's a flat-out lie and an insult to them. It makes a mockery of history.
 
I think you're reading too much into it. Surely Trump supporters (and I'm not including you) know their guy doesn't come across well to blacks. Look at his lie: "our African-American communities are absolutely in the worst shape they’ve ever been in before. Ever, ever, ever..."

It's a flat-out lie and an insult to them. It makes a mockery of history.

Trump hasn't spoken all that much about policy although I believe he says he's for school choice but a change from the status quo is white supremacy? I'm not buying that
 
I think you're reading too much into it. Surely Trump supporters (and I'm not including you) know their guy doesn't come across well to blacks. Look at his lie: "our African-American communities are absolutely in the worst shape they’ve ever been in before. Ever, ever, ever..."

It's a flat-out lie and an insult to them. It makes a mockery of history.

We'll know after November how well he came across to blacks.

But Trump often uses hyperbole to make his points: his point is that the black community has suffered under Obama---even Farrakhan makes the same claim. The ever...ever bit is hyperbole. Obviously, Trump doesn't think the black community was better off before the Civil War and I think most people, including black people get that.

Hyperbole is a legitimate rhetorical device.

Democrats know they're vulnerable with the black vote so they will demonize Trump's outreach every chance they get.
 
Trump supporters are primarily motived by a desire to reassert white male dominance over the culture. So why does Trump even bother with this feigned concern for the well-being of black people? What he’s really pushing is an old and ugly narrative: Black people are incapable of handling responsibility and therefore need white people to control them. You know, for their own good.
whoever wrote this is nuts.
 
ya there is some kina weird narrative that only politically correct partisans can actually care about the black community.

Do they even care? If...if...blacks in any significant numbers start to get the idea they've been had by liberals---it's all over for liberals and the democrat party. They won't admit it, but Trump is dangerous in that regard.
 
Do they even care? If...if...blacks in any significant numbers start to get the idea they've been had by liberals---it's all over for liberals and the democrat party. They won't admit it, but Trump is dangerous in that regard.
I wouldn't say "had" -but I would say if it's broke,then you might try another way to fix it.
Trumps outreach is to be applauded.
 
I wouldn't say "had" -but I would say if it's broke,then you might try another way to fix it.
Trumps outreach is to be applauded.

True, 'had' means proving intent which is hard to do.

But how much evidence do they need to see that liberal policies have failed them---particularly, in urban areas. Sometimes it just takes a nudge.

Trump I think, is trying to do that. He was smart in aggressively going after them. And 'no holds barred' was the right approach.
 
True, 'had' means proving intent which is hard to do.

But how much evidence do they need to see that liberal policies have failed them---particularly, in urban areas. Sometimes it just takes a nudge.

Trump I think, is trying to do that. He was smart in aggressively going after them. And 'no holds barred' was the right approach.
it was the right thing to do. It gets blown off as trying to make college educated whites more 'comfortable' with Trump -and there is that.
But it's still a good thing -I can't see how outreach cannot be good
 
Back
Top