Why isn't the NRA sending Colion Noir to Charlotte?

Legion Troll

A fine upstanding poster


If you are a black man in America, exercising your constitutional right to keep and bear arms can be fatal.

You might think the National Rifle Association and its amen chorus would be outraged, but apparently they believe Second Amendment rights are for whites only.

In reaching that conclusion I am accepting, for the sake of argument, the account given by the Charlotte police of how they came to fatally shoot Keith Lamont Scott on Tuesday.

Scott’s killing prompted two nights of violent protests that led North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory (R) to declare a state of emergency.

Last Friday, police in Tulsa shot and killed Terence Crutcher — an unarmed black man.

Scott’s relatives claim he was unarmed as well. But let’s assume that police are telling the truth and he had a handgun.

What reason was there for officers to confront him?

North Carolina, after all, is an open-carry state. A citizen has the right to walk around armed if he or she chooses to do so. The mere fact that someone has a firearm is no reason for police to take action.




https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/in-america-gun-rights-are-for-whites-only/2016/09/22/3990d370-80f2-11e6-8327-f141a7beb626_story.html?utm_term=.77347495b925&wpisrc=nl_draw2&wpmm=1
 


If you are a black man in America, exercising your constitutional right to keep and bear arms can be fatal.

You might think the National Rifle Association and its amen chorus would be outraged, but apparently they believe Second Amendment rights are for whites only.

In reaching that conclusion I am accepting, for the sake of argument, the account given by the Charlotte police of how they came to fatally shoot Keith Lamont Scott on Tuesday.

Scott’s killing prompted two nights of violent protests that led North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory (R) to declare a state of emergency.

Last Friday, police in Tulsa shot and killed Terence Crutcher — an unarmed black man.

Scott’s relatives claim he was unarmed as well. But let’s assume that police are telling the truth and he had a handgun.

What reason was there for officers to confront him?

North Carolina, after all, is an open-carry state. A citizen has the right to walk around armed if he or she chooses to do so. The mere fact that someone has a firearm is no reason for police to take action.




https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/in-america-gun-rights-are-for-whites-only/2016/09/22/3990d370-80f2-11e6-8327-f141a7beb626_story.html?utm_term=.77347495b925&wpisrc=nl_draw2&wpmm=1

Where in the 2nd amendment does it state one is free to ignore lawful orders from police officers while brandishing a firearm? Ya the new take from the NAACP is that it doesn't even matter if this violent felon ex con who can't even legally own a gun was armed or not. Go suck more black cock faggot.
 
Last edited:
Where in the 2nd amendment does it state one is free to ignore lawful orders from police officers while brandishing a firearm? Ya the knew take from the NAACP is that it doesn't even matter if this violent felon ex con who can't even legally own a gun was armed or not. Go suck more black cock faggot.

since you seem to be unable to comprehend simple definitions, why don't you tell us what YOU think brandishing means.
 
so not only are you a moron, but you're a racist homosexual?

Better than a nigger dick taking cuck faggot like you. He had a gun, refused police orders to comply while holding said gun, and was shot by an African American hero cop in a good shoot and nigger dick taking faggots like you are calling for his head and burning the city to the ground, kill yourself.
 
Better than a nigger dick taking cuck faggot like you. He had a gun, refused police orders to comply while holding said gun, and was shot by an African American hero cop in a good shoot and nigger dick taking faggots like you are calling for his head and burning the city to the ground, kill yourself.

you need a xanax? because all i asked was if they planted the gun. i've not said anything else about it. you hearing voices in your head now?
 
you need a xanax? because all i asked was if they planted the gun. i've not said anything else about it. you hearing voices in your head now?

Ya they planted the gun, it was a book, in fact it was a bible and he was on the way to church to feed some orphans. Fucking idiot, the man was a career criminal who amongst numerous other felonies served 7 years in prison for aggravated assault and now you want to tarnish the reputation and ruin the life of an upstanding African American serving his community for this low life nigger piece of shit, fucking kill yourself.
 
Ya they planted the gun, it was a book, in fact it was a bible and he was on the way to church to feed some orphans. Fucking idiot, the man was a career criminal who amongst numerous other felonies served 7 years in prison for aggravated assault and now you want to tarnish the reputation and ruin the life of an upstanding African American serving his community for this low life nigger piece of shit, fucking kill yourself.
you do need a xanax. take three.
 
so not only are you a moron, but you're a racist homosexual?
Truly nasty piece of work, another one for the ban list.


If you are a black man in America, exercising your constitutional right to keep and bear arms can be fatal.

You might think the National Rifle Association and its amen chorus would be outraged, but apparently they believe Second Amendment rights are for whites only.

In reaching that conclusion I am accepting, for the sake of argument, the account given by the Charlotte police of how they came to fatally shoot Keith Lamont Scott on Tuesday.

Scott’s killing prompted two nights of violent protests that led North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory (R) to declare a state of emergency.

Last Friday, police in Tulsa shot and killed Terence Crutcher — an unarmed black man.

Scott’s relatives claim he was unarmed as well. But let’s assume that police are telling the truth and he had a handgun.

What reason was there for officers to confront him?

North Carolina, after all, is an open-carry state. A citizen has the right to walk around armed if he or she chooses to do so. The mere fact that someone has a firearm is no reason for police to take action.




https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/in-america-gun-rights-are-for-whites-only/2016/09/22/3990d370-80f2-11e6-8327-f141a7beb626_story.html?utm_term=.77347495b925&wpisrc=nl_draw2&wpmm=1


Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk
 


If you are a black man in America, exercising your constitutional right to keep and bear arms can be fatal.

You might think the National Rifle Association and its amen chorus would be outraged, but apparently they believe Second Amendment rights are for whites only.

In reaching that conclusion I am accepting, for the sake of argument, the account given by the Charlotte police of how they came to fatally shoot Keith Lamont Scott on Tuesday.

Scott’s killing prompted two nights of violent protests that led North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory (R) to declare a state of emergency.

Last Friday, police in Tulsa shot and killed Terence Crutcher — an unarmed black man.

Scott’s relatives claim he was unarmed as well. But let’s assume that police are telling the truth and he had a handgun.

What reason was there for officers to confront him?

North Carolina, after all, is an open-carry state. A citizen has the right to walk around armed if he or she chooses to do so. The mere fact that someone has a firearm is no reason for police to take action.




https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/in-america-gun-rights-are-for-whites-only/2016/09/22/3990d370-80f2-11e6-8327-f141a7beb626_story.html?utm_term=.77347495b925&wpisrc=nl_draw2&wpmm=1

Yawn

Nice non sequitur
 
In July, police killed a black man named Philando Castile in Falcon Heights, Minn., after pulling him over for a traffic stop. When officers approached the car, Castile told them he was licensed to carry a handgun.

Castile made this declaration so that the officers would not be surprised upon seeing the gun. But rather than assure them that he was a law-abiding citizen exercising his constitutional right, Castile’s announcement had the opposite effect.

The horror that ensued was live-streamed on Facebook by Castile’s girlfriend, Diamond Reynolds. Her cellphone video and calm, composed narration were chilling, especially to those of us who frequently commit the offense of driving while black. One of the officers shot Castile several times, and Reynolds watched as Castile slumped next to her, his life bleeding away.

Did Castile reach for the gun? Reynolds maintains he was merely reaching for his wallet to get his driver’s license, as the officer had ordered.

Disclosure of the gun, meant to avert potential tragedy, seems to have invited it.

Afterward, it was confirmed that Castile did indeed have a legal permit to carry a gun. He was not guilty of any crime. He was just 32 — and, incredibly, had in his brief life been stopped a total of 52 times for nickel-and-dime traffic violations.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/in-america-gun-rights-are-for-whites-only/2016/09/22/3990d370-80f2-11e6-8327-f141a7beb626_story.html?utm_term=.4e72e5f4bd6c&wpi%20src=nl_draw2&wpmm=1
 
Back
Top