Should obama VetO bill allowing 911 victims to sue saudi Arabia??

Bill

Malarkeyville

The House approved legislation Friday by voice vote that would allow families of 9/11 victims to sue the government of Saudi Arabia, CBS News has confirmed.

In May, the Senate passed the measure, which was sponsored by Sens. John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Chuck Schumer, D-New York.

The White House has expressed opposition to the bill. Speaking to CBS News’ Charlie Rose in April, President Obama warned that the bill could have consequences that would, for example, allow people in other countries to sue the U.S.

“This is a matter of how generally the United States approaches our interactions with other countries. If we open up the possibility that individuals and the United States can routinely start suing other governments, then we are also opening up the United States to being continually sued by individuals in other countries,” Mr. Obama said at the time.

The bill’s passage comes before the 15th anniversary Sunday of the 2001 attacks that killed thousands in New York, Washington, D.C. and Pennsylvania.

Even if Mr. Obama vetoes the bill, it’s possible Congress might have the votes to override his veto.​
 
Should obama VetO bill allowing 911 victims to sue saudi Arabia??

Yes, the legislation is political grandstanding on the part of Congressional Republicans, passed in bad faith seeking only to contrive a conflict with the president for some perceived partisan gain.

The legislation is unwarranted, irresponsible, and devoid of merit.
 
Yes he should. Those arrogant whites who stole land from the natives and enslaved blacks just need to shut the fuck up and take it up the ass. /sarcasm
 
The fall-out will land on the next president......

If that next president is the ANTI-ISLAMIC trumpf can you imagine what is going to go through the minds of our friends in that region??
 
The fall-out will land on the next president......

If that next president is the ANTI-ISLAMIC trumpf can you imagine what is going to go through the minds of our friends in that region??

What friends? Israel?
 
He should..but even if he does it will get an over-ride, so he won't..
It's pure political theater- right in the sweet spot for Congress
 
He should..but even if he does it will get an over-ride, so he won't..
It's pure political theater- right in the sweet spot for Congress
No way in hell Congress overturns this veto. Of course, he could just table it.

Iraq would be the first to sue us.
 
He should..but even if he does it will get an over-ride, so he won't..
It's pure political theater- right in the sweet spot for Congress

That will be theater w/ a great price... You are talking about an absolutist dictatorial family that cuts off limbs & heads & does not even allow women to DRIVE ....... You don't think they are going to fire back?? You can recall the Arab oil embargo I am sure........ & you toss your boy trumpf in there?? SCARY!!
 
Yes, the legislation is political grandstanding on the part of Congressional Republicans, passed in bad faith seeking only to contrive a conflict with the president for some perceived partisan gain.

The legislation is unwarranted, irresponsible, and devoid of merit.


New York Democrat Jerrold Nadler, helped write the bill, The Senate passed it unanimously in May.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., one of the authors of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, said he was “pleased” the House had “taken this huge step forward towards justice” and said he hoped the Obama administration would not veto the bill.

Michigan Rep. John Conyers, the top Democrat on the Judiciary panel, said Friday, "I remain hopeful that we can continue to work with the Administration so we can resolve these issues so the legislation can be signed into law by the president."

You wanna tell us all about some DEMOCRATS that might have opposed the bill, sonny....
 
Yes, the legislation is political grandstanding on the part of Congressional Republicans, passed in bad faith seeking only to contrive a conflict with the president for some perceived partisan gain.

The legislation is unwarranted, irresponsible, and devoid of merit.

The votes were unanimous.
 
Back
Top