AAPS: 71% of Dr.s' polled say Hillary's health concerns are "Serious!"

Irish

Verified User
From the article:
- Concerns about Hillary Clinton's health are "serious—could be disqualifying for the position of President of the U.S.," say nearly 71% of 250 physicians responding to an informal internet survey by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

So maybe this is why Hillary is having coughing fits and has to leave the press conference. After a review of 250 medical Drs by AAPS, 71% concluded she is NOT healthy enough to be POTUS!!! This has to have the dems panicking! This is a scientific consensus.


So not only will she be the most corrupt president of all time, she maybe the sickest.


http://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...n-physicians-and-surgeons-aaps-300325065.html
 
From the article:


So maybe this is why Hillary is having coughing fits and has to leave the press conference. After a review of 250 medical Drs by AAPS, 71% concluded she is NOT healthy enough to be POTUS!!! This has to have the dems panicking! This is a scientific consensus.


So not only will she be the most corrupt president of all time, she maybe the sickest.


http://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...n-physicians-and-surgeons-aaps-300325065.html

That's not what it said liar. The 71% said it COULD be serious enough
 
...Faux News...
chartoftheday_3511_americas_most_trusted_news_channels_n.jpg
 
Fox News Viewers Uninformed, NPR Listeners Not, Poll
A poll by Farleigh Dickinson University in New Jersey showed that of all the news channels out there, Fox News viewers are the least informed.

People were asked questions about news habits and current events in a statewide poll of 600 New Jersey residents recently. Results showed that viewers of Sunday morning news shows were the most informed about current events, while Fox News viewers were the least informed. In fact, FDU poll results showed they were even less informed than those who say they don’t watch any news at all.

Readers of The New York Times, USA Today and listeners to National Public Radio were better informed about international events than other media outlets.

In one major example, New Jersey poll participants were questioned about the outcome of the so-called Arab Spring uprisings in North Africa earlier in the year. A total of 53% of respondents know that Egyptians were successful in overthrowing dictator Hosni Mubarak. Also, 48% know that the Syrian uprising has thus far been unsuccessful in ousting Assad. But on balance, Fox News viewers were 18-points less likely to know that Egyptians overthrew their government than those who were not TV news viewers. Fox News viewers were also 6-points less likely to know that Syrians have not yet overthrown their government than those who watch no news, suggesting a daily dose of sound bytes from CNN at the gym, and headlines from Google GOOG -1.98% News were enough to surpass what average Fox viewers polled knew about current events.

Fox News is the leading cable news channel.

“Because of the controls for partisanship, we know these results are not just driven by Republicans or other groups being more likely to watch Fox News,” said Dan Cassino, a professor of political science at Fairleigh Dickinson and an analyst for the PublicMind Poll. “Rather, the results show us that there is something about watching Fox News that leads people to do worse on these questions than those who don’t watch any news at all.”

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapo...-npr-listeners-not-poll-suggests/#32112794618
 
Back
Top