Tim Kaine Denies Existence Of Sanctuary Cities

when you card EVERYONE you make latinos hate the police


you also create a population that will NEVER report a crime


that means criminals can attack people without getting even reported you fucking idiots





this you lying assed partisan shitheads
 
Parsing legal terms aside, is Kaine ok with sanctuary cities or not? And if he is, can WV tell the EPA to go F' itself lol?

Maybe you should find something outside your echo chamber of disingenuous sources which keep you a low information voter.

Again, there is no sanctuary from federal law and so your "City of Sanctuary from the EPA" would be a phantom. Certainly, a city in West Virginia may choose not to make the EPA's rules an enforcement priority.
 
yes I realize there is no legal meaning -it's a shorthand term. But sanctuary cities do exist in practicality.
Kaine wants to downplay their existence ( he could have said "they are not a legal term") -but using the word phantom
connotes a non-existence, or an ethereal presence. Politically making them a figment of Trump
Sanctuary cities are real - whatever the legal niceties

So not only are you low information you are also quite dense.

Again, there is no sanctuary from Federal law. You are pursuing a phantom or a figment of your imagination/ignorance. Kaine's answer may have went over your head but it is accurate.
 
So not only are you low information you are also quite dense.

Again, there is no sanctuary from Federal law. You are pursuing a phantom or a figment of your imagination/ignorance. Kaine's answer may have went over your head but it is accurate.
you are relying on an extreme narrow legal definition. I am relying on the practicality of extant circumstances.
Which one of us is dense in terms of refusal to see things as they are?

You can say it over and over -but it doesn't mitigate cities removing themselves from federal law -creating a "sanctuary" (sic)
from ICE detainers. Federal law is supreme on immigration
 
you are relying on an extreme narrow legal definition.

No. The federal supremacy clause is not narrow at all.

I am relying on the practicality of extant circumstances.


You are relying on misinformation and lies.

Which one of us is dense in terms of refusal to see things as they are?

You can say it over and over -but it doesn't mitigate cities removing themselves from federal law -creating a "sanctuary" (sic)
from ICE detainers. Federal law is supreme on immigration

There is your phantom. They have not removed themselves from Federal law any more than Tampa or many other cities did when they decriminalized marijuana.

Yes, it is supreme and it remains supreme in the so called "sanctuary" cities. That was Kaine's point.
 
There is no sanctuary from federal law. In that sense, the concept of a "Sanctuary City" is a phantom. There are cities that have chosen not to make Federal immigration laws an enforcement priority.

Sweet! Now WV can chose not to make EPA mining regulations an enforcement priority lol.
 
Sweet! Now WV can chose not to make EPA mining regulations an enforcement priority lol.

Yes, they can. I seriously doubt they enforce EPA mining regulations. I have never heard of a police officer arresting anyone for that sort of thing (maybe they do, but it's likely very rare). Maybe the state and local versions of the EPA do.

You are an ignorant fool.
 
Last edited:
Yes, they can. I seriously doubt they enforce EPA mining regulations. I have never heard of a police officer arresting anyone for that sort of thing (maybe they do, but it's likely very rare). Maybe the state and local versions of the EPA do.

You are an ignorant fool.

Groups first filed formal petitions with EPA regarding West Virginia and Kentucky nearly five years ago, which requested the agency revoke the two states' authority to implement the Clean Water Act. In exchange, the petitions suggested EPA should take over such authority in those states.

http://www.statejournal.com/story/2...-push-epa-to-enforce-clean-water-act-in-ky-wv
___________

It pays to do a little research before calling someone a fool. Unless you want to come off looking like one yourself lol.

So, not enforcing federal laws is only a bad thing when it involves the environment. Are you duplicitous about anything else?
 
Groups first filed formal petitions with EPA regarding West Virginia and Kentucky nearly five years ago, which requested the agency revoke the two states' authority to implement the Clean Water Act. In exchange, the petitions suggested EPA should take over such authority in those states.

http://www.statejournal.com/story/2...-push-epa-to-enforce-clean-water-act-in-ky-wv
___________

It pays to do a little research before calling someone a fool. Unless you want to come off looking like one yourself lol.

So, not enforcing federal laws is only a bad thing when it involves the environment. Are you duplicitous about anything else?

Damn, you are stupid.

This is a request for the federal government to take over enforcement of environmental regulations in WV and Ky. The federal government certainly can enforce immigration laws in every city in this country. That is why the so called "Sanctuary City" is a phantom. The feds simply cannot set the enforcement priorities of local governments.
 
No. The federal supremacy clause is not narrow at all.
did I not say "federal law is supreme" on immigration?

Originally Posted by anatta
I am relying on the practicality of extant circumstances

You are relying on misinformation and lies.
your position is absurd. are you denying that hundreds of cities in the US ignore ICE detainers at will?

Originally Posted by anatta

Which one of us is dense in terms of refusal to see things as they are?

You can say it over and over -but it doesn't mitigate cities removing themselves from federal law -creating a "sanctuary" (sic)
from ICE detainers. Federal law is supreme on immigration

There is your phantom.
They have not removed themselves from Federal law any more than Tampa or many other cities did when they decriminalized marijuana.Yes, it is supreme and it remains supreme in the so called "sanctuary" cities. That was Kaine's point

states decriminalize by statute -cities do so by non-enforcement-but are subject to state sanctions if imposed.

State decriminalization is dependent on the USDA's memo of understanding from DoJ .
The Ogden memo is a good ex of a memoranda written by Doj for the US District Attorneys.

MEMORANDUM FOR SELECTED UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
FROM: David W. Ogden, Deputy Attorney General
SUBJECT: Investigations and Prosecutions in States Authorizing the Medical Use of Marijuana
https://www.justice.gov/opa/blog/me...orneys-investigations-and-prosecutions-states


In that case both the DoJ and states were in some accord not to prosecute medical marijuana.
But there is no such memo in force by the Obama adm on sanctuary cities.
There is simply no consequences for cities now - yet they are in violation without even a memo (prosecutorial discretion)

What Trump is saying is there will be no such understanding going forward, if he was elected.
I have no idea what Kaine is saying as his message is garbled
 
did I not say "federal law is supreme" on immigration?

But you don't seem to understand what that means. It means that federal law still applies in so called sanctuary cities.

your position is absurd. are you denying that hundreds of cities in the US ignore ICE detainers at will?

No. They can't be forced to use their resources to enforce the Federal governments priorities.

states decriminalize by statute -cities do so by non-enforcement-but are subject to state sanctions if imposed.

State decriminalization is dependent on the USDA's memo of understanding from DoJ .
The Ogden memo is a good ex of a memoranda written by Doj for the US District Attorneys.

MEMORANDUM FOR SELECTED UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
FROM: David W. Ogden, Deputy Attorney General
SUBJECT: Investigations and Prosecutions in States Authorizing the Medical Use of Marijuana
https://www.justice.gov/opa/blog/me...orneys-investigations-and-prosecutions-states


In that case both the DoJ and states were in some accord not to prosecute medical marijuana.
But there is no such memo in force by the Obama adm on sanctuary cities.
There is simply no consequences for cities now - yet they are in violation without even a memo (prosecutorial discretion)

Huh? The Ogden memo has no effect on city or state governments. It explained the Federal government's enforcement priorities to agents of the Federal government not to anyone at the state level. It stated that they would continue to enforce laws against medical marijuana, in certain circumstances. It did not say that the states/cities must continue to enforce laws against medical marijuana or give them leave from that.

Obama did change enforcement priorities on immigration but that has nothing to do with the cities and they certainly do not need his approval.

What Trump is saying is there will be no such understanding going forward, if he was elected.

Trump/The President is impotent in this matter.

I have no idea what Kaine is saying as his message is garbled

I am sure. You need the third grade language of Trump.
 
Back
Top