Trump's NMBLA donations?

[Jarod]

I don't want to say the allegations that Trump donated to NAMBLA and is a member are true.

I am sure if they are not, he will easily prove it by releasing his tax returns which will clear this right up....


http://nymag.com/daily/intelligence...re-saying-donald-trump-donated-to-nambla.html

 

[tsuke]

should be easy to request a donor list from nabla

 

[Jarod]

should be easy to request a donor list from nabla

I doubt they would share such information. Trump can prove it himself, why go through NAMBLA?

Plus Tax returns are sworn documents, NAMBLA's lists are not.

 

[Seahawk]

Good job on sinking lower than Troll.

Dumbass.

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk

 

[tsuke]

I doubt they would share such information. Trump can prove it himself, why go through NAMBLA?

Plus Tax returns are sworn documents, NAMBLA's lists are not.

but you are concerned about the truth. I was pointing out you could ask another organization

 

[MAGA MAN]

I doubt they would share such information. Trump can prove it himself, why go through NAMBLA?

Plus Tax returns are sworn documents, NAMBLA's lists are not.

If NAMBLA is a corporation they certainly are sworn documents. Jeebus what a terrible lawyer you must be.

 

[Jarod]

If NAMBLA is a corporation they certainly are sworn documents. Jeebus what a terrible lawyer you must be.

1) Someone said they are a corporation?
2) No, if you ask a corporation for a donor list, they can issue one that is not a sworn document.

 

[Seahawk]

I "heard" Jarod murdered someone.

He can prove his innocence by turning himself into the police and going to trial.

 

[Jarod]

I "heard" Jarod murdered someone.

He can prove his innocence by turning himself into the police and going to trial.

Sorry, the Constitution says in the eyes of the Government I must be innocent until proven guilty, so I am innocent.

 

[Seahawk]

Sorry, the Constitution says in the eyes of the Government I must be innocent until proven guilty, so I am innocent.

That is a absolutely wrong. Are you really a lawyer?

Using your logic, Trump is innocent and doesn't have to produce anything to prove otherwise.

FYI, it is presumed innocent, not "must be innocent".

 

[tsuke]

Sorry, the Constitution says in the eyes of the Government I must be innocent until proven guilty, so I am innocent.

Well thats why you get the trial :3

 

[Jarod]

That is a absolutely wrong. Are you really a lawyer?

Using your logic, Trump is innocent and doesn't have to produce anything to prove otherwise.

FYI, it is presumed innocent, not "must be innocent".

Semantics, but that's why I said, in the eyes of the Government. You are treated as if you are innocent, by the government until you are proven guilty.

 

[Jarod]

Well thats why you get the trial :3

No thanks. The State does not have Reasonable Suspicion much less Probable Cause.

 

[Seahawk]

Semantics, but that's why I said, in the eyes of the Government. You are treated as if you are innocent, by the government until you are proven guilty.

It is not semantics. You claim to be a lawyer and you're actually going to double down on "must be innocent"? Words have meaning, especially in the law. Do you tell your clients they "must be innocent"?

And why aren't you applying the same standard to Trump?

 

[Seahawk]

No thanks. The State does not have Reasonable Suspicion much less Probable Cause.

But here you are, without any probable cause or reasonable suspicion saying Trump must prove he is innocent of your charge.

 

[MAGA MAN]

1) Someone said they are a corporation?
2) No, if you ask a corporation for a donor list, they can issue one that is not a sworn document.

1. Either that or a tax-paying or tax exempt entity. Surely you can't be this stupid.
2. Ax for their tax records.

 

[MAGA MAN]

No thanks. The State does not have Reasonable Suspicion much less Probable Cause.

Neither do you, on Trump. And as someone who has a picture of a statue of a naked man for his avatar, and has stated on this board that he sucked a man's cock and was ass-penetrated, you are much more suspect of perversion than Trump.

 

[Jarod]

But here you are, without any probable cause or reasonable suspicion saying Trump must prove he is innocent of your charge.

I'm not the government!

 

[Jarod]

Neither do you, on Trump. And as someone who has a picture of a statue of a naked man for his avatar, and has stated on this board that he sucked a man's cock and was ass-penetrated, you are much more suspect of perversion than Trump.

Perversion? Sorry I see none!

 

[Jarod]

Additionally, I accused Trump of nothing.