96% of Hillary's charity is to self

Trump Foundation

NEW YORK, NY

Why isn't this organization rated?

This organization is not eligible to be rated by Charity Navigator because it is a Private Foundation.
Private foundations receive the majority of their money from only one individual, family or corporation. This differs from the public charities that Charity Navigator evaluates. Public charities have a broad-base of support from the general public as well as variety of other funding sources. The IRS requires that private foundations file a Form 990-PF which differs from the document public charities file. This makes it impossible for us to compare the financial performance of private foundations to public charities.

What does it mean that this organization isn’t rated?


It simply means that the organization doesn't meet our criteria. A lack of a rating does not indicate a positive or negative assessment by Charity Navigator.

https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.profile&ein=133054537
 
:rolleyes: If you didn't bitch about Rmoney's foundation four years ago then don't come crying about this one. It just makes you all look really hypocritical.

You're the one that continually attempts to change the subject every time someone mentions Hillary....you're the one afraid to even discuss the shady money trail
shes attached to ....
Romney ain't in the race....hes totally irrelevant to this election....and this thread
you wanna talk about him, start another thread and have a ball....
 
You're the one that continually attempts to change the subject every time someone mentions Hillary....you're the one afraid to even discuss the shady money trail
shes attached to ....
Romney ain't in the race....hes totally irrelevant to this election....and this thread
you wanna talk about him, start another thread and have a ball....

I mean, you HAVE to understand the irony of a post like this...right?
 
Trump Foundation

NEW YORK, NY

Why isn't this organization rated?

This organization is not eligible to be rated by Charity Navigator because it is a Private Foundation.
Private foundations receive the majority of their money from only one individual, family or corporation. This differs from the public charities that Charity Navigator evaluates. Public charities have a broad-base of support from the general public as well as variety of other funding sources. The IRS requires that private foundations file a Form 990-PF which differs from the document public charities file. This makes it impossible for us to compare the financial performance of private foundations to public charities.

What does it mean that this organization isn’t rated?


It simply means that the organization doesn't meet our criteria. A lack of a rating does not indicate a positive or negative assessment by Charity Navigator.

https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.profile&ein=133054537

It's too small unlike the Clinton Slush Fundation which takes in hundreds of millions from foreign interests. Try checking your own article it says clearly that the money in that charity is Trumps unlike the Clinton Foundation money which is from Russia, Saudia Arabia, China, etc.
 
:rolleyes: If you didn't bitch about Rmoney's foundation four years ago then don't come crying about this one. It just makes you all look really hypocritical.

Oh fuck off show us that Romneys charity was taking in tens of millions of dollars from foreign interests and that 90% of that money was going to his friends and associates in the form of huge salaries, giant bonuses, and lavish travel expenses instead of to charity, the Clinton Foundation isn't a charity you dumb bitch it's a slush fund.
 
Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation
1271 Avenue of the Americas
42nd Floor
New York, NY 10020
www.clintonfoundation.org
Tax Status: 501(c)3
Other Names

Clinton Foundation
Clinton Global Initiative
Clinton Health Access Initiative
William J. Clinton Foundation

Charities often solicit donors under multiple names. CharityWatch is aware of this charity soliciting donors using the above names.

RATING: A

Is this rating different than what you expected based on what the charity reports about itself or what other raters report about this charity? Read about what makes CharityWatch's independent ratings different from other sources of information.


Trump for Prison 2016

Charity Navigator has them on their watchlist because 90% of the money they took in went to the Clintons friends and associates in the former of huge salaries, giant bonuses, and lavish travel expenses:

http://nypost.com/2015/04/26/charity-watchdog-clinton-foundation-a-slush-fund/
 
Trump Foundation

NEW YORK, NY

Why isn't this organization rated?

This organization is not eligible to be rated by Charity Navigator because it is a Private Foundation.
Private foundations receive the majority of their money from only one individual, family or corporation. This differs from the public charities that Charity Navigator evaluates. Public charities have a broad-base of support from the general public as well as variety of other funding sources. The IRS requires that private foundations file a Form 990-PF which differs from the document public charities file. This makes it impossible for us to compare the financial performance of private foundations to public charities.

What does it mean that this organization isn’t rated?


It simply means that the organization doesn't meet our criteria. A lack of a rating does not indicate a positive or negative assessment by Charity Navigator.

https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.profile&ein=133054537
lol......you know charity navigator says exactly the same thing about the Clinton foundation, right?.......
https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.profile&ein=311580204
 
Oh fuck off show us that Romneys charity was taking in tens of millions of dollars from foreign interests and that 90% of that money was going to his friends and associates in the form of huge salaries, giant bonuses, and lavish travel expenses instead of to charity, the Clinton Foundation isn't a charity you dumb bitch it's a slush fund.

Here's the Charity Navigator Watch List you ignorant moron, and the CGI is NOT on it.
CN Watchlist

Charity Navigator launched in 2002, with an evaluation system that graded charities on a 0 to 4-star rating. By 2010, we were seeing enough serious charges against and questionable reporting by charities and their leadership that we decided it was time to add another designation – the Donor Advisory – as a way to help inform and protect donors. And then in 2014, we added another designation - the CN Watchlist.

https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.watchlist
 
then it was simple liberal dishonesty that caused you to intentionally used it to discredit Trump even though the exact same thing is true about Clinton?.....

Liar. I pointed out that Charity Navigator's evaluation process worked the same for both foundations but ignorant cons like you only paid attention to the CGI rating.
 
Public. Records.

Public Records Reveal Romney Profited From Corruption, Fraud, and Racketeering at Bain

Over the past nine months, a question plaguing Willard Mitt Romney is when he left as CEO of Bain Capital due to conflicting state and federal SEC and FEC filing statements contradicting his retroactive retirement contention. It is pertinent to know why he fled Bain Capital in August 2001, and why he cited February 1999 as his official separation date when he was CEO the entire time.

Organized crime figures develop elaborate schemes to avoid Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations and in Romney’s case it was Bain Capital’s bankruptcy fraud he was desperate to avoid.

MoveOn.org filed a complaint with the DOJ over Romney’s disclosure claiming he was 100% stock holder and paid Bain Capital executive in 2002 despite his contention left active management in 1999. The period between Feb 1999 and Aug 2001 is when Romney, Bain Capital, and their corrupt operatives conspired to commit bankruptcy fraud guaranteeing Bain Capital could plunder a company they managed with impunity.

Bain Capital’s secret law firm, MNAT, colluded with Romney’s bankruptcy gang by committing perjury to represent the debtors’ counsel and creditor’s counsel to give the appearance of being on opposite sides and conceal the fact eToys was not broke. Controlling both sides, Bain Capital’s corrupt gang colluded to plunder the company’s assets without opposition, and give Bain Capital eToys for free...

Despite the fact that Bain’s secret law firms (MNAT and Paul Traub) admitted lying, there was no Department of Justice investigation into Bain Capital, Romney, or their surrogates’ fraud and perjury because in August 2001, George W. Bush nominated another MNAT partner, Colm Connolly, as Delaware United States Attorney. Consequently, as Bain Capital’s friend, he refused to investigate and/or prosecute the confessed acts of perjury and admitted intentional crimes....

http://www.politicususa.com/2012/11...fited-corruption-fraud-racketeering-bain.html

So....to make a long story short...Romney was never accused, charged, arrested, tried or convicted of anything.....

and irregularities based on conjecture come only from left wing rumor mongers.....and the DOJ declined to even investigate....

Romney involved with sandal by association , Hillary directly involved by her own words and actions causing FBI investigation
Romney not fingerprinted.....Hillary was
FBI didn't haul him in for questioning.....Hillary was
Romney didn't lie to Congress.....Hillary did

AND, even more importantly....ROMNEY ISN"T RUNNING FOR ANYTHING
 
Liar. I pointed out that Charity Navigator's evaluation process worked the same for both foundations but ignorant cons like you only paid attention to the CGI rating.

bullshit......you posted that CN did not rate Trump and completely ignored the fact they didn't rate Clinton for the very same reason...
 
So....to make a long story short...Romney was never accused, charged, arrested, tried or convicted of anything.....

and irregularities based on conjecture come only from left wing rumor mongers.....and the DOJ declined to even investigate....

Romney involved with sandal by association , Hillary directly involved by her own words and actions causing FBI investigation
Romney not fingerprinted.....Hillary was
FBI didn't haul him in for questioning.....Hillary was
Romney didn't lie to Congress.....Hillary did

AND, even more importantly....ROMNEY ISN"T RUNNING FOR ANYTHING

Looks like the fix was in with Rmoney. Here it is in big, bold type. I don't want you to miss it.

"Despite the fact that Bain’s secret law firms (MNAT and Paul Traub) admitted lying, there was no Department of Justice investigation into Bain Capital, Romney, or their surrogates’ fraud and perjury because in August 2001, George W. Bush nominated another MNAT partner, Colm Connolly, as Delaware United States Attorney. Consequently, as Bain Capital’s friend, he refused to investigate and/or prosecute the confessed acts of perjury and admitted intentional crimes...."
 
Here's the Charity Navigator Watch List you ignorant moron, and the CGI is NOT on it.
CN Watchlist

Charity Navigator launched in 2002, with an evaluation system that graded charities on a 0 to 4-star rating. By 2010, we were seeing enough serious charges against and questionable reporting by charities and their leadership that we decided it was time to add another designation – the Donor Advisory – as a way to help inform and protect donors. And then in 2014, we added another designation - the CN Watchlist.

https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.watchlist

Lying cunt from cunt town:

Your OP is a lie.
The The Clinton Foundation is a charitable foundation. The money the Clinton's give to that foundation ceases to be theirs.


The The Clinton Foundation (founded in 1997 as the William J. Clinton Foundation,[4] and called during 2013–15 the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation[5]) is a nonprofit corporation under section 501(c)(3) of the U.S. tax code. It was established by former President of the United States Bill Clinton with the stated mission to "strengthen the capacity of people throughout the world to meet the challenges of global interdependence." The Foundation focuses on improving global health and wellness, increasing opportunity for women and girls, reducing childhood obesity and preventable diseases, creating economic opportunity and growth, and helping communities address the effects of climate change. The Foundation works principally through partnerships with like-minded individuals, organizations, corporations, and governments, often serving as an incubator for new policies and programs. Its offices are located in New York City and Little Rock, Arkansas.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Foundation

Bullshit, something like 10% actually went to charity the rest went to Clintons friends and family through huge salaries, bonuses, and travel expenses.


The Clinton Foundation’s finances are so messy that the nation’s most influential charity watchdog put it on its “watch list” of problematic nonprofits last month.

The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid.

The group spent the bulk of its windfall on administration, travel, and salaries and bonuses, with the fattest payouts going to family friends.

On its 2013 tax forms, the most recent available, the foundation claimed it spent $30 million on payroll and employee benefits; $8.7 million in rent and office expenses; $9.2 million on “conferences, conventions and meetings”; $8 million on fundraising; and nearly $8.5 million on travel. None of the Clintons is on the payroll, but they do enjoy first-class flights paid for by the foundation.

In all, the group reported $84.6 million in “functional expenses” on its 2013 tax return and had more than $64 million left over — money the organization has said represents pledges rather than actual cash on hand.

Some of the tens of millions in administrative costs finance more than 2,000 employees, including aid workers and health professionals around the world.

But that’s still far below the 75 percent rate of spending that nonprofit experts say a good charity should spend on its mission.

Charity Navigator, which rates nonprofits, recently refused to rate the Clinton Foundation because its “atypical business model . . . doesn’t meet our criteria.”

Charity Navigator put the foundation on its “watch list,” which warns potential donors about investing in problematic charities. The 23 charities on the list include the Rev. Al Sharpton’s troubled National Action Network, which is cited for failing to pay payroll taxes for several years.


Other nonprofit experts are asking hard questions about the Clinton Foundation’s tax filings in the wake of recent reports that the Clintons traded influence for donations.

“It seems like the Clinton Foundation operates as a slush fund for the Clintons,” said Bill Allison, a senior fellow at the Sunlight Foundation, a government watchdog group where progressive Democrat and Fordham Law professor Zephyr Teachout was once an organizing director


http://nypost.com/2015/04/26/charity-watchdog-clinton-foundation-a-slush-fund/
 
Back
Top