Russia Strikes from Iranian air base show it's expanding footprint in the Mid East

anatta

100% recycled karma
Russian bombers flying from an Iranian air base struck rebel targets across Syria on Tuesday, Russian and Iranian officials said, dramatically underscoring the two countries’ growing military ties and highlighting Russia’s ambitions for greater influence in a turbulent Middle East.

The long-range Tu-22 bombers took off from a base near Hamadan in western Iran and launched raids in the Syrian provinces of Aleppo, Deir al-Zour and Idlib, the Russian Defense Ministry said in a statement. The ministry said the bombers were accompanied by Russian fighter jets based in Syria.

Both countries are staunch allies of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, but the flights marked the first time Russia has launched strikes from Iranian territory.

Iran has long banned foreign militaries from establishing bases on its soil. But the raids appeared to signal a budding alliance that would expand Russia’s military footprint in the region.

Iran and Russia “enjoy strategic cooperation in the fight against terrorism in Syria, and share their facilities and capacities to this end,” Iran’s National Security Council chief, Ali Shamkhani, said Tuesday, according to the state-run Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA).


State Department deputy spokesman Mark Toner called the flights “unfortunate, but not surprising or unexpected.” Like other Russian strikes in Syria, he said, the Russian bombers predominantly targeted moderate opposition forces fighting against Assad, rather than the Islamic State or other terrorist groups.

“It only makes more difficult what is already a complex, contentious and difficult situation,” Toner said, adding that it was “unclear” whether Russia planned to continue using the Iranian base, or the operation was a “one-off.”

Secretary of State John F. Kerry raised the flights in a Tuesday telephone conversation with his Russian counterpart, Sergei Lavrov, Toner said.

Under the terms of a U.S.-Russia agreement to “deconflict” their flights over Syria, the U.S. military was notified in advance that the bombers would pass across Iraqi airspace and through Syria, according to Col. Christopher Garver, the Baghdad-based spokesman for U.S. forces in Iraq and Syria.

“It was not a lot of time, but it was enough,” Garver said of the notice given. He said the Russian aircraft “did not impact coalition operations in either Iraq or Syria,” where coalition planes are in the air virtually around the clock.

Although several countries in the region have flirted with strengthened ties to Russia, Moscow has made little headway in fulfilling its ambitions for greater Middle East sway. Syria has long been an exception, historically purchasing Russian arms and hosting a Russian naval facility on the Mediterranean.

Tehran, in addition to their joint support for Assad, has seen strategic advantage in relations with post-Soviet Russia, sharing a desire to counter U.S. influence with increased trade and energy cooperation. The Iran nuclear deal allowed Russia to fulfill a years-old agreement to sell Iran its powerful S-300 air-defense missile system.


Last year, Russia and Iran signed a military cooperation deal focused on training and on fighting terrorism. On Sunday, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s top Middle East envoy arrived in Tehran to discuss bilateral relations. Russia has also requested the use of Iranian airspace to fire cruise missiles at rebel targets in Syria.


[Shiite-led Iran has sent thousands of troops and fighters, including members of its Revolutionary Guard Corps, to Syria to bolster Assad — who is from the Shiite minority Alawite sect — against largely Sunni rebels. For Tehran, losing a longtime ally to a majority-Sunni uprising would undermine its own influence in the region.

Iranian proxies such as Lebanon’s Hezbollah and an array of Shiite Iraqi militias have also fought for the Syrian regime. And last year, Russia began its own operations in Syria, committing tanks, artillery and combat aircraft to the fight. It also built a new air base in Latakia province in the Alawite heartland.

Russian intervention marked a turning point in the fate of the Assad regime, which had been losing ground to rebel forces.

But until now, Russia’s long-range bombers, which require longer airstrips, had to be launched from Russian territory more than 1,200 miles away. Now, those same bombers need to fly only about 400 miles from Iran to Syria, Iran’s Fars News Agency reported Tuesday. The shorter distance, using less fuel and allowing a bigger payload, will allow Russia to intensify its air campaign against rebel-held areas.

Syrian government troops and opposition fighters are now locked in a battle for the strategic city of Aleppo, where residents face a growing humanitarian crisis. Russia has carried out strikes in support of government troops there, activists say.


Russia’s Defense Ministry said Tuesday that its long-range bombers struck targets linked to the Islamic State and Jabhat Fatah al-Sham, a group that formally split from al-Qaeda last month and changed its name from Jabhat al-Nusra. The strikes destroyed five major ammunition depots, training camps and three command posts, the ministry said.

But rights groups have criticized both Russia and the Syrian regime for repeated strikes on civilian targets, including homes, schools and hospitals. Russian and Syrian officials have denied those reports.

On Tuesday, the New York-based Human Rights Watch said Syrian and Russian troops have used banned incendiary weapons in civilian areas.

“These weapons inflict horrible injuries and excruciating pain,” Steve Goose, arms director at Human Rights Watch, said in a statement. “The disgraceful incendiary weapon attacks in Syria show an abject failure to adhere to international law.”

Iran is also deeply involved in conflicts in Yemen and Iraq, where it holds particular influence.

Iran was quick to provide military supplies to the Shiite-led government in Baghdad as Islamic State militants made their land grab in the summer of 2014, pushing toward the capital.

In recent years, Maj. Gen. Qasem Soleimani, commander of the Revolutionary Guard Corps’ elite Quds Force, has made regular appearances on the battlefield in both Iraq and Syria, becoming the public face of Iran’s growing military power.
ttps://www.washingtonpost.com/world/russia-uses-iranian-air-base-to-bomb-syria/2016/08/16/6b2a30e2-6393-11e6-96c0-37533479f3f5_story.html
 
The Iran/Russian axis is quickly becoming the dominate force in the middle east.

The Saudi's hair must be on fire.

And Obama is helpless again to shape event, while Russia expands it direct and indirect influence.
That Ira n Nuke deal looks more and more a crappy deal.

Beyond the ME Russia is fomenting again in the Ukraine. I'm starting to think there is no ability
to reach any accord with Putin, at least until after he plays out his gambits.
 
No one has legit interests there but us...........:rolleyes:
c'mon. Russia is free to pursue it's interests. we pursue our's. that's a given.

Whom do you think is more successful under the Obama adm? I'd say he was an utter failure in the ME
 
c'mon. Russia is free to pursue it's interests. we pursue our's. that's a given.

Whom do you think is more successful under the Obama adm? I'd say he was an utter failure in the ME

Utter is such a strong word, how about complete??? lol

Well thus far no one.. daesh had their run & now that is slowly coming to an end...

Iran has become a more active player in their backyard, but blaming obama kinda assumes that would not have happened anyway, & I believe it would have, one way or another..

In fairness to him, he can only do the best he can w/ the hand he was dealt & he stuck to the plan to leave.. Now looking back w/ 20/20~myopically we can say that is was a mistake, but doesn't that assume something as bad or worse wouldn't have happened anyway?? Our troops targeted, massive attacks in Baghdad, Shia attacks, our troops on trial etc etc etc

it doesn't take much to imagine lots of bad things happening there..
 
Utter is such a strong word, how about complete??? lol

Well thus far no one.. daesh had their run & now that is slowly coming to an end...

Iran has become a more active player in their backyard, but blaming obama kinda assumes that would not have happened anyway, & I believe it would have, one way or another..

In fairness to him, he can only do the best he can w/ the hand he was dealt & he stuck to the plan to leave.. Now looking back w/ 20/20~myopically we can say that is was a mistake, but doesn't that assume something as bad or worse wouldn't have happened anyway?? Our troops targeted, massive attacks in Baghdad, Shia attacks, our troops on trial etc etc etc

it doesn't take much to imagine lots of bad things happening there..
I'm not even going down that road of extending the Iraq SOFA.
It might have helped,it might not have been enough, it wasn't going to happen..etc.

Bu i'm going after the Iran nuke deal-what has it gotten us? scorn and and direct alignment of Iran with Russia ( Shiite Crescent)
while causing huge worries , and abandonment of our Sunni partners.

So much so both Eqypt and SA are working more and more closely with Russia.

Then the insane "red line" in Syria, which goes to show we are feckless under Obama. The players in the region pay attention to that.
Iran knows it can roam unchecked, while the Sunni's can't look to us for their security guarantees
 
I'm not even going down that road of extending the Iraq SOFA.
It might have helped,it might not have been enough, it wasn't going to happen..etc.

Bu i'm going after the Iran nuke deal-what has it gotten us? scorn and and direct alignment of Iran with Russia ( Shiite Crescent)
while causing huge worries , and abandonment of our Sunni partners.

So much so both Eqypt and SA are working more and more closely with Russia.

Then the insane "red line" in Syria, which goes to show we are feckless under Obama. The players in the region pay attention to that.
Iran knows it can roam unchecked, while the Sunni's can't look to us for their security guarantees

So are we now the protectors of SUnni Islam?? The same branch as daesh & the terrorist out to kill us??
 
So are we now the protectors of SUnni Islam?? The same branch as daesh & the terrorist out to kill us??
We are security partners - we are both interested in preserving the status quo ( as opposed to more "arab springs") and countering Russia/Iran axis of power.
No body said protectors of the ummah .we have some common interests, and those should be reinforced/kept.
It's just like realpolitik anywhere in the world
 
The Iran/Russian axis is quickly becoming the dominate force in the middle east.

The Saudi's hair must be on fire.

And Obama is helpless again to shape event, while Russia expands it direct and indirect influence.
That Ira n Nuke deal looks more and more a crappy deal.

Beyond the ME Russia is fomenting again in the Ukraine. I'm starting to think there is no ability
to reach any accord with Putin, at least until after he plays out his gambits.

Obama powerless? This is what Obama wanted. Starting with his awful nuke deal.

He also paid them ransom then tried to deny it.
 
Obama powerless? This is what Obama wanted. Starting with his awful nuke deal.
He also paid them ransom then tried to deny it.
Obama wanted a more balanced approach to the ME..but Iran doesn't want anything to do in concert with the "great satan"
 
Obama wanted a more balanced approach to the ME..but Iran doesn't want anything to do in concert with the "great satan"

Obama is like most progressive libs. They think we can negotiate and sue for peace. He actually thought he'd be the great ME peace maker. When reality is hitting him the face, he still refuses to acknowledge it doesn't work.
 
Obama is like most progressive libs. They think we can negotiate and sue for peace. He actually thought he'd be the great ME peace maker. When reality is hitting him the face, he still refuses to acknowledge it doesn't work.
Obama believes in the power of Obama to re-make the region..
 
c'mon. Russia is free to pursue it's interests. we pursue our's. that's a given.

Whom do you think is more successful under the Obama adm? I'd say he was an utter failure in the ME

Putin has prospered under Obama/Clinton/Kerry, yet some idiots propagate the Trump/Putin meme. I guess idiots will be idiots lol.

Failure only begins to describe Obama in the Middle East. I won't even bother listing them. Trump went through that laundry list in his foreign policy speech.

Trump presents a clear policy choice compared to Clinton. Ironically, Trump is saying things liberals should like [no more pointless interventions, no more democracy building] and it's like all their ears will allow them to hear is the part that Obama 'founded' ISIS. Hell, Bill Kristol[!] likes Hillary better than Trump.

I don't know what to make of it.
 
Putin has prospered under Obama/Clinton/Kerry, yet some idiots propagate the Trump/Putin meme. I guess idiots will be idiots lol. Failure only begins to describe Obama in the Middle East. I won't even bother listing them. Trump went through that laundry list in his foreign policy speech. Trump presents a clear policy choice compared to Clinton. Ironically, Trump is saying things liberals should like [no more pointless interventions, no more democracy building] and it's like all their ears will allow them to hear is the part that Obama 'founded' ISIS. Hell, Bill Kristol[!] likes Hillary better than Trump. I don't know what to make of it.

You'll make of it whatever Vlad tells your master to tell you to make of it, loyal little lapdoggy.
 
We are security partners - we are both interested in preserving the status quo ( as opposed to more "arab springs") and countering Russia/Iran axis of power.
No body said protectors of the ummah .we have some common interests, and those should be reinforced/kept.
It's just like realpolitik anywhere in the world
We have some common interest w the Persians as well....but....but....but...
 
We have some common interest w the Persians as well....but....but....but...
about allwe have in common now is killing ISIS.
Iran has made it clear they are not going to work with any agenda of ours - even with ISIS their agenda extends to regional hegemony.
They are geo-political allies with Russia now.
 
about allwe have in common now is killing ISIS.
Iran has made it clear they are not going to work with any agenda of ours - even with ISIS their agenda extends to regional hegemony.
They are geo-political allies with Russia now.
They reached out & had their hand slapped away by bush & obama hasn't done much better...

They wanted to cooperate on daesh & the same thing-but yet they are the bad guy...:rolleyes:

We are not going to agree on their concerns-you don't feel they have any legit concerns, eventhough they are surrounded by hostile Sunni nations, some Nuclear armed, not to mention the American & Israel hegemony in the ME & the American hegemony in Central Asia/sub-continent..
 
Back
Top