DNC WIKILEAKS source murdered by Clintons

Absolutely nothing, snopes is no longer a debunk sight it is a DNC talking point sight.

Nothing in the snopes rules it yea or nay. Just confirms he was shot and not robbed as his father stated.
It's "improbable" to not be robbed if shot. It's quite probable you meet with the FBI at an unusual time when you are blowing the whistle on someone running for president. And we now know he did just that.
 
Nothing in the snopes rules it yea or nay. Just confirms he was shot and not robbed as his father stated.
It's "improbable" to not be robbed if shot. It's quite probable you meet with the FBI at an unusual time when you are blowing the whistle on someone running for president. And we now know he did just that.

You would expect a professional hit to be cleaner. The guy apparently was critically wounded and left to die. Professional hit doesn't add up unless it went bad. I suppose that happens.

Is the FBI involvement a freaky coincidence. And which angle is Assage playing? Does he really know something or just doing a little self promoting. Wiki Leaks is offering a reward for information on the killer. What's that all about.

My guess is Wiki and Assage know something.
 
And the conspiracy advocates roll on, in their own distorted cesspools. There were Bush 'hit list' sites, so the wacko libs don't get a pass, either. But, if you pause for a minute to reflect on this mentality that if I hate 'someone' so much that anything negative is a certainty, you come up with twisted logic.

Anything unexplained must be credited to the evil person. Any remote possible motive is assured. All accidental and natural deaths are not. Even if all deaths on the list are not actually attributable to that 'someone', the sheer volume of accusations guarantees that most are probably true. No. Not at all. The size of the bullshit pile is not a measure of its veracity. Get a fucking grip.
 
And the conspiracy advocates roll on, in their own distorted cesspools. There were Bush 'hit list' sites, so the wacko libs don't get a pass, either. But, if you pause for a minute to reflect on this mentality that if I hate 'someone' so much that anything negative is a certainty, you come up with twisted logic.

Anything unexplained must be credited to the evil person. Any remote possible motive is assured. All accidental and natural deaths are not. Even if all deaths on the list are not actually attributable to that 'someone', the sheer volume of accusations guarantees that most are probably true. No. Not at all. The size of the bullshit pile is not a measure of its veracity. Get a fucking grip.

Well, why would Wiki Leaks care about it lol?

Let's hear your theory.
 
You would expect a professional hit to be cleaner. The guy apparently was critically wounded and left to die. Professional hit doesn't add up unless it went bad. I suppose that happens.

Is the FBI involvement a freaky coincidence. And which angle is Assage playing? Does he really know something or just doing a little self promoting. Wiki Leaks is offering a reward for information on the killer. What's that all about.

My guess is Wiki and Assage know something.

He knows where his emails came from. He knows he got them to make it impossible for FBI to conceal. If it was FBI that shot him they would tell him if he talked, others die so the "botched" shot could be intentional.
Mainly Assange made the point that people risk a lot to whistle blow and highlighting it hopefully produces better protection.
 
He knows where his emails came from. He knows he got them to make it impossible for FBI to conceal. If it was FBI that shot him they would tell him if he talked, others die so the "botched" shot could be intentional.
Mainly Assange made the point that people risk a lot to whistle blow and highlighting it hopefully produces better protection.

Interesting.
 
Well, why would Wiki Leaks care about it lol?

Let's hear your theory.

Why would you want to hear my theory? I don't know shit. The difference between me and you is that you don't know that you don't know shit. Meanwhile, I'll await for more facts, and you can keep rolling up your theories to smoke. Don't blame me if it turns out you were smoking turds.
 
Why would you want to hear my theory? I don't know shit. The difference between me and you is that you don't know that you don't know shit. Meanwhile, I'll await for more facts, and you can keep rolling up your theories to smoke. Don't blame me if it turns out you were smoking turds.

You seem a tad incurious about it lol.

Are you voting for Hillary?
 
You would expect a professional hit to be cleaner. The guy apparently was critically wounded and left to die. Professional hit doesn't add up unless it went bad. I suppose that happens.

Is the FBI involvement a freaky coincidence. And which angle is Assage playing? Does he really know something or just doing a little self promoting. Wiki Leaks is offering a reward for information on the killer. What's that all about.

My guess is Wiki and Assage know something.

Or else someone didn't want it to be obvious that it was a professional hit.

Dying / dead reaches the same objective.
 
Nothing in the snopes rules it yea or nay. Just confirms he was shot and not robbed as his father stated.
It's "improbable" to not be robbed if shot. It's quite probable you meet with the FBI at an unusual time when you are blowing the whistle on someone running for president. And we now know he did just that.

They editorialized the hell out of that article like claiming what ifs like if he was still alive why didn't he say he was set up when we don't know if he was able to talk in the first place.
 
And the conspiracy advocates roll on, in their own distorted cesspools. There were Bush 'hit list' sites, so the wacko libs don't get a pass, either. But, if you pause for a minute to reflect on this mentality that if I hate 'someone' so much that anything negative is a certainty, you come up with twisted logic.

Anything unexplained must be credited to the evil person. Any remote possible motive is assured. All accidental and natural deaths are not. Even if all deaths on the list are not actually attributable to that 'someone', the sheer volume of accusations guarantees that most are probably true. No. Not at all. The size of the bullshit pile is not a measure of its veracity. Get a fucking grip.

Yep just a coincidence that he was the wikileaks email source that is going to put Clinton in jail was murdered in a robbery where nothing was robbed.
 
They editorialized the hell out of that article like claiming what ifs like if he was still alive why didn't he say he was set up when we don't know if he was able to talk in the first place.

Yup, that too. Threats against loved ones are sop. He won't put bullseyes on his gf mom etc. Going to the FBI was a costly mistake.
 
You have been watching too many TV murder mysteries where the dying person leans in and whispers their killers name as their last dying breath leaves them

I will say this, it is very dangerous to know the Clintons. Many people around them die mysteriously

They are the real world Underwoods from House Of Cards.
 
Back
Top