ID laws halted becuase they are racist

Mott the Hoople said:
So what? They are all intended to repress voter turn out by exaggerating a virtually non-existent problem. Voter fraud. Since all...and I mean all...objective sources of data show, uncategorically, that voter fraud in the U.S. is not even statistically significant.
Click to expand...
We have to be on the Electoral Roll and present a voters card which is sent by post to vote at the ballot box. So why can't you lot do the same?

Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk
 
Mott the Hoople said:
So what? They are all intended to repress voter turn out by exaggerating a virtually non-existent problem. Voter fraud. Since all...and I mean all...objective sources of data show, uncategorically, that voter fraud in the U.S. is not even statistically significant.
Click to expand...
Many people died to give black people a vote, so why is having ID such a big deal?

Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk
 
evince said:
you are too stupid to know whats real or not on the interets
Click to expand...
Is this the most ironic post ever? This is the veritable queen of stupidity talking.
evince said:
image: http://3hvfzc2w6u7kruih321x50k1.wpe...tent/uploads/2015/02/DailySurge_Logo_Web1.png
DailySurge












News



Videos



Entertainment



Cool Stuff



About Us












Error 404!
The page you requested does not exist or has moved.
Read more at http://dailysurge.com/2015/02/democrat-introduces-legislation-allow-dead-people-to-vote/#
Click to expand...


Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk
 
Milagro said:
Many people died to give black people a vote, so why is having ID such a big deal?

Sent from my Lenovo K50-t5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...



because they are designed to slove NO EXSISTING problem

they are designed to bring down votes of color


are you saying our courts are lying you fucking traitor
 
evince said:
http://www.dw.com/en/us-judges-stri...states/a-19439443?maca=en-rss-en-all-1573-rdf




US judges strike down voter ID restrictions in three states

Judges have rejected voter identification laws in three US states, including North Carolina, Kansas and Wisconsin. Critics said the laws restricted voting rights for poor people and those from minority communities.

Wahlkabine USA Wähler



The North Carolina General Assembly "enacted legislation that restricted voting and registration in five different ways, all of which disproportionately affected African Americans," federal judge Diana Motz wrote in her ruling.

The measure, which was signed into law by North Carolina's Republican Governor Patrick McCrory in August 2013 was approved "with discriminatory intent," the ruling said. The new law required voters at polls starting 2016 to show photo identity cards, "which African American voters disproportionately lacked and eliminated or reduced registration and voting access tools that African Americans disproportionately used," Motz said.

The North Carolina voting law limited the number of acceptable photo IDs to six, reduced early voting and eliminated same-day registration. Supporters of the law said the restriction for IDs would help combat voter fraud, but critics, like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the NCAAP say the measure discriminates against minority voters and poor people, who are less likely to have drivers' licenses, for example.



Kansas, Wisconsin follow suit

Similarly in Kansas, which traditionally votes Republican, a judge ordered the state to count thousands of votes in local and state elections from people who did not provide proof of US citizenship when they registered.

The ruling was a response to Kansas Secretary of State Kris Krobach's proposed rule to prevent illegal residents from voting. But the judge's decision meant around 17,000 voters would have their ballots counted in the upcoming elections for the state legislature. Supporters say there have been few cases of fraud in the past.

In Wisconsin, considered a swing state, US Judge James Peterson ordered the state to quickly issue election IDs to people who were lacking required documents such as birth certificates. He struck down restrictions on early and absentee voting, saying they discriminated against blacks. He removed a prohibition on using expired student IDs for voting and on distributing absentee ballots by fax or email.

Voting standards in the US are agreed upon at a local level and come under scrutiny before presidential polls in the so-called swing states, where voters may choose either Democrats or Republicans. African Americans have been reliable Democrat voters, and party members believe the voter identification law may be a ploy to suppress their vote.

The latest rulings follow a recent decision by a New Orleans court to ease restrictions on the voter ID law in Texas, which critics consider
Click to expand...







post 5
 
Judges have rejected voter identification laws in three US states, including North Carolina, Kansas and Wisconsin. Critics said the laws restricted voting rights for poor people and those from minority communities.
 
multiple states judges have looked at all the facts and said you fucks are hate filled fucking racists traitors to democracy



are you going to lie about them like you lie about me


see why I hate you fucking slandering lying evil traitors to every thing that is good in this world



you lie straight into the face of facts


you are the enemy of all mankind
 
what post number is it you lying fuckmunch


lies will eat your organs away

someday you will pay in massive pain you created yourself
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top