BOOM!

USFREEDOM911

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
BOOM! Five Officers Bring Lawsuit Against Marilyn Mosby

When Baltimore State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby dropped all criminal charges in the remaining cases against police officers involved in the Freddie Gray case, she may have thought she was putting an end to a particularly ugly chapter in the city’s history in which there were no winners, but in fact, Mosby’s troubles may just be beginning.

Mosby vaulted to national attention in May 2015 when she held an emotional, racially charged press conference to announce the filing of criminal charges against six officers in connection with the death of a suspect after being transported to jail in police custody.

Now, fifteen months later, the 36-year-old prosecutor faces possible disbarment and civil suits by the officers after four trials failed to produce a guilty verdict on a single count.

The officers were charged with everything from misconduct in office and reckless endangerment to murder in a prosecution that seemed designed both to appease rioters who had looted and burned the City of Baltimore for weeks and further Mosby’s political career.

After two weeks of rioting and looting on the city streets following Gray’s death, Mosby told a crowd at a press conference, “To the people of Baltimore and the demonstrators across America: I heard your cries of “No Justice, No Peace.””

Mosby is black, as was Gray, however three of the police officers were black, as well.

Legal experts called the move “overcharging” with no hope of winning convictions, which the trial judge, The Hon. Barry Williams, clearly believed, as well. Williams is also black.

Mosby’s high visibility in the media in the following weeks and months, such as appearing on stage with Prince and in a Vogue Magazine cover story, led many to suspect she was using the publicity as a springboard to a possible run for political office.

Instead, Mosby will be headed to court as a defendant facing allegations of defamation, false arrest, false imprisonment, and violation of constitutional rights, and possible malicious prosecution.

So far, the Gray case has cost Baltimore taxpayers $14 million, including a $6 million immediate “payout” to Gray’s family, arranged by an attorney who contributed to Mosby’s election campaign.
 
I wonder if all those paid protesters who set the town on fire will apologize now, and pay for the damage they caused over another false accusation!
 
absolute immunity will have this suit thrown out at the first motion. these cops are just angry idiots who got a taste of what most civilians go through in dealing with law enforcement.
 
absolute immunity will have this suit thrown out at the first motion. these cops are just angry idiots who got a taste of what most civilians go through in dealing with law enforcement.


Apparently not, these men were exonerated, this was a witch (cop) hunt that went very bad!
 
Apparently not, these men were exonerated, this was a witch (cop) hunt that went very bad!

acquitted or not is irrelevant. prosecutors have absolute immunity unless it can be proven that they falsified evidence in order to sway a grand jury or win a conviction, and even then they are rarely punished. this will go nowhere. i'm surprised the suit was even brought. must have been the brainchild of the union president trying to win even more protection and rights for the largest street gang in america.
 
acquitted or not is irrelevant. prosecutors have absolute immunity unless it can be proven that they falsified evidence in order to sway a grand jury or win a conviction, and even then they are rarely punished. this will go nowhere. i'm surprised the suit was even brought. must have been the brainchild of the union president trying to win even more protection and rights for the largest street gang in america.

I think she did falsify info, hard to prove though you are right, at best it was grandstanding, and pushing the very premise you seem to be, what is it you have against police officers?
 
absolute immunity will have this suit thrown out at the first motion. these cops are just angry idiots who got a taste of what most civilians go through in dealing with law enforcement.

What about this;
•that she improperly withheld evidence from the defense that was exculpatory

Which is addressed in her possible disbarment.
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?71032-Disbarment-Charges-Filed

But maybe the city will settle the case, with a payout of $6 million to each of them. :palm:
 
I think she did falsify info, hard to prove though you are right, at best it was grandstanding, and pushing the very premise you seem to be, what is it you have against police officers?

there is hardly any accountability for wrong actions. most of them know this, most of them cover for those 'few bad apples', and an apathetic populace who prefer to have a legalized execution squad to make them feel safer.
 
What about this;
•that she improperly withheld evidence from the defense that was exculpatory

Which is addressed in her possible disbarment.
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?71032-Disbarment-Charges-Filed

But maybe the city will settle the case, with a payout of $6 million to each of them. :palm:

she wouldn't be the first one to withhold evidence and not face any punishment. the disbarment proceeding MIGHT generate some sort of punishment, but that's not a lawsuit. the city will most likely settle the case for more than a civilian would get, there is precedent for this because they are police. all of which further proves my point that there are two systems of justice in this country.....one for police and one for civilians. I guess cops are upper class citizens compared to us lowlife serfs.
 
there is hardly any accountability for wrong actions. most of them know this, most of them cover for those 'few bad apples', and an apathetic populace who prefer to have a legalized execution squad to make them feel safer.

Every profession has its bad apples and cops are no different.

How about a thought experiment: let's assume cops police themselves to the extent there are no bad apples left in their ranks.

Apart from decreasing the number of instances where cops were unequivocally in the wrong, I submit nothing much would change. The OP is an example. A charge was made against some Baltimore cops but they were dropped because the evidence wasn't there. Which is the rule rather than the exception in these high profile instances. Michael Brown and Darren Wilson was another. Martin Zimmerman didn't involve a cop but the issue was driven---to the wrong conclusion, by the same sort of animus.

Clearly, the issue is a two way street. And the cop problem is the easier one to address since it's an institution with its own regulations and etc. They just need better self inforcement.

But what do you do with the other problem?
 
Every profession has its bad apples and cops are no different.

How about a thought experiment: let's assume cops police themselves to the extent there are no bad apples left in their ranks.

Apart from decreasing the number of instances where cops were unequivocally in the wrong, I submit nothing much would change. The OP is an example. A charge was made against some Baltimore cops but they were dropped because the evidence wasn't there. Which is the rule rather than the exception in these high profile instances. Michael Brown and Darren Wilson was another. Martin Zimmerman didn't involve a cop but the issue was driven---to the wrong conclusion, by the same sort of animus.

Clearly, the issue is a two way street. And the cop problem is the easier one to address since it's an institution with its own regulations and etc. They just need better self inforcement.

But what do you do with the other problem?

what other problem are you talking about? it got lost in the text. the problem with the 'every profession - bad apple' meme is that with cops, if one or two officers cross the line, the fellow cops either ignore it, participate in it, or intervene enough to the point of stopping the bad cop, but not reporting or doing anything else about it because the 'thin blue line' frowns upon such practices. therefore, the so called good cops then become collaborators, making them bad cops.
 
what other problem are you talking about? it got lost in the text. the problem with the 'every profession - bad apple' meme is that with cops, if one or two officers cross the line, the fellow cops either ignore it, participate in it, or intervene enough to the point of stopping the bad cop, but not reporting or doing anything else about it because the 'thin blue line' frowns upon such practices. therefore, the so called good cops then become collaborators, making them bad cops.

See, this is why the issue will never advance. Too many people deny there's an issue with the other side of the argument.

What do you say about the Darren Wilson/Michael Brown instance? It didn't involve a bad cop but a kid who went bad. Are we supposed to pretend troubled kids from troubled communities aren't a factor in the equation?

Why does it have to be 100% a bad cop issue?
 
I think she did falsify info, hard to prove though you are right, at best it was grandstanding, and pushing the very premise you seem to be, what is it you have against police officers?

He's a cop wannabe, couldn't pass the physical, now working mall security watching fat women walking in and out of dressing rooms. ;)
 
she wouldn't be the first one to withhold evidence and not face any punishment. the disbarment proceeding MIGHT generate some sort of punishment, but that's not a lawsuit. the city will most likely settle the case for more than a civilian would get, there is precedent for this because they are police. all of which further proves my point that there are two systems of justice in this country.....one for police and one for civilians. I guess cops are upper class citizens compared to us lowlife serfs.

Oh-well; if you're ever charged with a crime, no matter how small, you should go ahead and eat a bullet, seeing as you're screwed anyway.

Maybe you should start now and avoid the wait. :D
 
He's a cop wannabe, couldn't pass the physical, now working mall security watching fat women walking in and out of dressing rooms. ;)

I disagree.

I think he FEELS he's been wronged and since the Court disagreed, he's chosen to cry all over the internet, about it.

He should cleanse his soul and explain what action he was found guilty of and how he FEELS the Court wronged him.
 
See, this is why the issue will never advance. Too many people deny there's an issue with the other side of the argument.

What do you say about the Darren Wilson/Michael Brown instance? It didn't involve a bad cop but a kid who went bad. Are we supposed to pretend troubled kids from troubled communities aren't a factor in the equation?

Why does it have to be 100% a bad cop issue?

not sure how long you've been on the board, but I didn't make a single criticizing statement about wilson over the brown shooting incident. by all accounts, it appears to have been justified.
 
there is hardly any accountability for wrong actions. most of them know this, most of them cover for those 'few bad apples', and an apathetic populace who prefer to have a legalized execution squad to make them feel safer.

It's a small minority of bad police officers, not the large number you project. The ones who are bad should be weeded out but to throw all police under the bus is disingenuous.
 
Back
Top