A brief reminder before the attempted murderers mother speaks tonight:

SmarterthanYou said:
why do you love them?
Click to expand...

Because, as a profession, they are willing to put their lives at risk for very little pay in order to do what they can to keep the thugs off the streets. Do I believe every one of them is perfect and without fault? No, nor do I believe that in ANY profession every one in that profession is without fault. There are bad apples regardless of the type of work being done. You take the attitude that it's an all or nothing with police. I don't know what you do or did if you're retired but I'd bet that not everyone in your profession was perfectly behaved or never did anything wrong. That being the case, should I group all of them into the they're bad category because of a very small percentage? That's what you do.

Why do you hate them?
 
Back in the 80's and 90's the used to have what was called skittles parties where you'd mix a variety of prescription drugs. It was a pharmaceutical version of Russian Roulette.
 
CFM said:
Because, as a profession, they are willing to put their lives at risk for very little pay in order to do what they can to keep the thugs off the streets. Do I believe every one of them is perfect and without fault? No, nor do I believe that in ANY profession every one in that profession is without fault. There are bad apples regardless of the type of work being done. You take the attitude that it's an all or nothing with police. I don't know what you do or did if you're retired but I'd bet that not everyone in your profession was perfectly behaved or never did anything wrong. That being the case, should I group all of them into the they're bad category because of a very small percentage? That's what you do.

Why do you hate them?
Click to expand...
little pay? Hell my neighbor is a deputy sheriff and he earns as much as I do. Actually his salary is a bit less than mine but he makes more in total compensation as he has better benefits and as far as danger goes policing is less dangerous than farming, fishing and firefighters and is about the same as my occupation.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
little pay? Hell my neighbor is a deputy sheriff and he earns as much as I do. Actually his salary is a bit less than mine but he makes more in total compensation as he has better benefits and as far as danger goes policing is less dangerous than farming, fishing and firefighters and is about the same as my occupation.
Click to expand...

A fast food worker is as dangerous of a job as a police officer or firefighter?
 
Althea said:
Right. He wasn't running away anymore, and he didn't get shot in the back. That doesn't mean he was charging at the cop either.
Click to expand...

Are you so unaware that you don't believe forensics can prove if someone was walking or running in a direction??
 
CFM said:
Because, as a profession, they are willing to put their lives at risk for very little pay in order to do what they can to keep the thugs off the streets. Do I believe every one of them is perfect and without fault? No, nor do I believe that in ANY profession every one in that profession is without fault. There are bad apples regardless of the type of work being done. You take the attitude that it's an all or nothing with police. I don't know what you do or did if you're retired but I'd bet that not everyone in your profession was perfectly behaved or never did anything wrong. That being the case, should I group all of them into the they're bad category because of a very small percentage? That's what you do.

Why do you hate them?
Click to expand...
99 times out of 100, if a single bad cop does something, the supposed good cops around him will not arrest him, most likely will not report him for fear of retaliation, therefore they are all collaborators with the bad apple, making them bad cops. you are an ignorant and naive fool to believe that they put their lives on the line more than any other person. I've seen supposed good cops do absolutely nothing while a bad cop maliciously ruins the life of someone who hasn't broken the law.....all because they could. they are the largest street gang in america.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
99 times out of 100, if a single bad cop does something, the supposed good cops around him will not arrest him, most likely will not report him for fear of retaliation, therefore they are all collaborators with the bad apple, making them bad cops. you are an ignorant and naive fool to believe that they put their lives on the line more than any other person. I've seen supposed good cops do absolutely nothing while a bad cop maliciously ruins the life of someone who hasn't broken the law.....all because they could. they are the largest street gang in america.
Click to expand...

You have proof of that or does your hatred of cops allow you to pull a number out of your ass and expect the rest of us to believe you?

Why don't you provide the names, addresses/contact info of those you CLAIM have had their lives ruined by all these bad cops. Unless you do, your claims go unproven and will be given the absolute value of zero when it comes to being valid. Remember, if you can't prove it, it didn't happen the way you say.
 
CFM said:
You have proof of that or does your hatred of cops allow you to pull a number out of your ass and expect the rest of us to believe you?

Why don't you provide the names, addresses/contact info of those you CLAIM have had their lives ruined by all these bad cops. Unless you do, your claims go unproven and will be given the absolute value of zero when it comes to being valid. Remember, if you can't prove it, it didn't happen the way you say.
Click to expand...

of course, you 'require' media proof or police reports. none of that bullshit eyewitness stuff, right koolaid swallower?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
of course, you 'require' media proof or police reports. none of that bullshit eyewitness stuff, right koolaid swallower?
Click to expand...

I didn't say anything about media proof or police reports. I said what I expected the person making the claim to do to support that claim. Either you can/will provide it or you can't/won't.

There were eyewitnesses that said Michael Brown has his hands up saying don't shoot. If that lie was believed, Darrin Wilson, someone you hate simply because he wears a police uniform, would have been indicted and likely convicted of doing something that PROOF and EVIDENCE proved he didn't do.

As for accepting you eyewitness account, the answer is no for two reasons. First, you're so biased against police it invalidates anything you say secondly, prove you were there when it happened. Taking your word for it would be like asking a fox with a feather in his mouth if he raided the hen house.
 
CFM said:
I didn't say anything about media proof or police reports. I said what I expected the person making the claim to do to support that claim. Either you can/will provide it or you can't/won't.
Click to expand...
why would you possibly want the persons name or address for?

CFM said:
There were eyewitnesses that said Michael Brown has his hands up saying don't shoot. If that lie was believed, Darrin Wilson, someone you hate simply because he wears a police uniform, would have been indicted and likely convicted of doing something that PROOF and EVIDENCE proved he didn't do.
Click to expand...
and now you're just being a moron and jumping on the bandwagon bullshit. i've never stated my opinion on the brown shooting, ever.

CFM said:
As for accepting you eyewitness account, the answer is no for two reasons. First, you're so biased against police it invalidates anything you say secondly, prove you were there when it happened. Taking your word for it would be like asking a fox with a feather in his mouth if he raided the hen house.
Click to expand...
what would you possibly accept as evidence, if not my word? this is the problem with copsuckers like you. it has to be a solid piece of verifiable proof, like the police report, before you'll believe anything against a cop. so kindly fuck off.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top