This is all happening under Obama

Irish

Verified User
Obama if officially Nero. Fiddling while the world burns.

Mass killings of cops. People dying left and right on the streets. Rampant Islamic terrorism all over the world. Great expansion of ISIS and terror.

Who has been in charge the last 8 years? Obama. Seems the media has forgotten.


All this mayhem started under his pathetic passificst watch. His hands off approach, call ISIS the JV team and ignore them, pull all the troops out of Iraq, knock out Ghadfi. He's the reason we are all in this mess. Support the Muslim brotherhood in Egypt.

ANd he says NOTHING about it. Won't even call it Islamic Terror. Why? because he's a Muslim.

Where am I wrong here?
 
Violence in America has steadily declined throughout the decades. WAY down since the Reagan years. Terrorist attacks around the globe have also decreased dramatically in that time.

Ergo, I can't take the OP seriously.
 
Violence in America has steadily declined throughout the decades. WAY down since the Reagan years. Terrorist attacks around the globe have also decreased dramatically in that time.

Ergo, I can't take the OP seriously.

It's been on the uptick over the last 8 years. Why stop at Reagan for your arbitrary time lone? Hell why not go back to the 1800s to the Gangs of New York era?
 
Violence in America has steadily declined throughout the decades. WAY down since the Reagan years. Terrorist attacks around the globe have also decreased dramatically in that time.

Ergo, I can't take the OP seriously.

While crime and murder are still way down compared to 1990 they are turning upwards. Now whether this is a trend or a blip remains to be seen.
 
It's been on the uptick over the last 8 years. Why stop at Reagan for your arbitrary time lone? Hell why not go back to the 1800s to the Gangs of New York era?

Murders peaked around 1990. What's your evidence they increased over the last eight years?
 
Violence in America has steadily declined throughout the decades. WAY down since the Reagan years. Terrorist attacks around the globe have also decreased dramatically in that time.

Ergo, I can't take the OP seriously.

On July 23, a thread was made related to Obama's claim that we're safer today from terrorism. You defended that by saying you use the number of attacks as supporting it. That means you don't care about how many are killed as long as there are fewer attacks. In other words, you're willing to accept more deaths and claim we're safer as long as fewer attacks cause them. I posed a situation asking you that very thing. You, in cowardly fashion, refused to answer calling it a gotcha question. It was a question seeing whether you cared about people or kissing Obama's ass. You refusal to answer proves my claim that you're the latter because you don't mind more people being killed in terrorist attacks as long as you can defend Obama's claim we're safer because we've had less of them.


Pucker up.
 
Well, I don't disagree w/ that. But that's really a separate issue from the over-the-top characterization of the OP.

What you do agree with is that less terrorist attacks mean we're safer even if more people are killed.
 
Hey - I already told you - I agree w/ you 100% that we were less safe under Bush.

That's the problem. You're agreeing with something I never said.

You have yet to answer my question, coward, about whether one attack killing 3000 people is better than 10 attacks killing 1000 because it's fewer attacks. You don't have to answer for the rest of us to know and agree with you 100% that you kiss Obama's ass no matter what he says.
 
Whoa!

You mean like Darla never said that she was voting for Hillary ONLY because she was a woman?

Darla only mentioned female in her post about why she was excited for the nomination. You want me to read things into it and assume she supports Hillary for reasons she never said.

I never said either way whether we were less safe or more safe under Bush. Bush wasn't the topic where you made that claim. Your statement that less attacks means more safe proves you don't care about how many people were killed as long as fewer attacks occurred.

Pucker up.
 
I think you are in a time warp, the world was burning 8.5 years ago, and the ashes are only now done smoldering.
 
Violence in America has steadily declined throughout the decades. WAY down since the Reagan years. Terrorist attacks around the globe have also decreased dramatically in that time.

Ergo, I can't take the OP seriously.

No Terrorist attacks and mass casualty attacks are way up fool. So are mass shootings. Way up under Obama.
 
Back
Top