Obama said today, 'the world has never been safer'

Thing1 said:
Kind of a "gotcha" question. I prefer no attacks & no lives lost. I'm not saying that I "prefer" anything aside from that.

My overall point is that it's hysteria. 1 out of 20 million chance that anyone dies in a terrorist attack - same as getting killed by a piece of furniture. I haven't seen anything on this thread to convince me otherwise.
Click to expand...

It's a question as to what you find better. You've said less attacks meant we were safer. I posed a situation where there were less attacks but more deaths and more attacks with less deaths.

Which one is it? I didn't ask what you prefer although I do prefer neither but the comparison is what was posed. It's not about the chances you have of being killed by a terrorist attack. It's not a gotcha question but one to see where you really stand. You have two choices. Answer or be considered a chicken shit coward. I know why you won't answer because you know you've backed yourself into a corner and have no way out.

I've seen enough by your unwillingness to answer that you'll pick coward.
 
CFM said:
As long as the number of attacks is down, that more people are killed doesn't bother you?

You mean the attack that could not have been planned in 8 months but planning that started when Clinton was more interested in having his "cigar" smoked than dealing with such problems?
Click to expand...

Thing faults us for being hysterical over Islamic terrorism deaths. If that's the case, isn't BLM being 'hysterical' over the number of innocent black people killed by cops. They have to be innocent black people that were shot and killed or it's not a fair comparison.

There was no one 'resisting arrest' in San Bernadino, Orlando, or Nice.

Maybe Thing, or someone, can run some numbers for us.
 
Thing1 said:
That's just stupid.

The world, and America, is safer overall. You're just cherrypicking.
Click to expand...

the dead in Chicago, would they be sweet cherries or sour?......

still waiting to see these stats about terrorism in the 70s.....now the 60s I remember....guys like Ayers blowing up police stations......but I'm sure Obama was just cherry picking when he became his buddy.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
the dead in Chicago, would they be sweet cherries or sour?......

still waiting to see these stats about terrorism in the 70s.....now the 60s I remember....guys like Ayers blowing up police stations......but I'm sure Obama was just cherry picking when he became his buddy.......
Click to expand...

I only recall low grade terrorism in the 70's. Ayers was a terrorist wannabe by today's standards.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top